4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Measuring Social Status and Social Behavior with Peer and Teacher Nomination Methods : Peer and Teacher Nomination Methods

      , ,

      Social Development

      Wiley-Blackwell

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Children's peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            From Censure to Reinforcement: Developmental Changes in the Association Between Aggression and Social Status

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              School-based interventions for aggressive and disruptive behavior: update of a meta-analysis.

              Research about the effectiveness of school-based psychosocial prevention programs for reducing aggressive and disruptive behavior was synthesized using meta-analysis. This work updated previous work by the authors and further investigated which program and student characteristics were associated with the most positive outcomes. Two hundred forty-nine experimental and quasi-experimental studies of school-based programs with outcomes representing aggressive and/or disruptive behavior were obtained. Effect sizes and study characteristics were coded from these studies and analyzed. Positive overall intervention effects were found on aggressive and disruptive behavior and other relevant outcomes. The most common and most effective approaches were universal programs and targeted programs for selected/indicated children. The mean effect sizes for these types of programs represent a decrease in aggressive/disruptive behavior that is likely to be of practical significance to schools. Multicomponent comprehensive programs did not show significant effects and those for special schools or classrooms were marginal. Different treatment modalities (e.g., behavioral, cognitive, social skills) produced largely similar effects. Effects were larger for better-implemented programs and those involving students at higher risk for aggressive behavior. Schools seeking prevention programs may choose from a range of effective programs with some confidence that whatever they pick will be effective. Without the researcher involvement that characterizes the great majority of programs in this meta-analysis, schools might be well-advised to give priority to those that will be easiest to implement well in their settings.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Social Development
                Social Development
                Wiley-Blackwell
                0961205X
                November 2015
                November 05 2015
                : 24
                : 4
                : 815-832
                Article
                10.1111/sode.12120
                © 2015
                Product
                Self URI (article page): http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/sode.12120

                Comments

                Comment on this article