2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Expression of Mismatch Repair Proteins in Merkel Cell Carcinoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Simple Summary

          Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and highly malignant skin cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation. About 80% are Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) positive. The aim of this work was to immunohistochemically investigate the expression of mismatch repair proteins (MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, and PMS2) in MCC ( n = 56). In a second step, tumors with a low expression were tested for microsatellite instability. Microsatellite instability in MCC could have an impact on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI) outcome. This study showed a significant association between low expression of mismatch repair proteins and a negative MCPyV status. Microsatellite instability was detected in only one case. Future studies will establish whether this subset of MCC patients respond better to ICI.

          Abstract

          We aimed to assess for the first time the mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Immunohistochemistry was performed for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 on patients’ tumor tissue ( n = 56), including neighbored healthy control tissue. In cases with low-level MMR expression (<10th percentile), we performed multiplex PCR in combination with high-resolution capillary electrophoresis in order to confirm microsatellite instability (MSI). Microscopic evaluation revealed a high median expression for all MMR proteins studied (91.6–96.3%). However, six patients (56/10.7%) had low-level MLH1 expression, six (55/10.9%) had low-level MSH2 expression, five (56/8.9%) had low-level MSH6 expression, and six (54/11.1%) had low-level PMS2 expression. Together, we observed nine (56/16.1%) patients who had low-level MMR expression of at least one protein. Of the patients with low-level MMR expression, MSI evaluation was possible in five cases, revealing one case with high-level MSI. In all MMR proteins assessed, low-level expression was significantly ( p = 0.0004 to p < 0.0001) associated with a negative Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) status. However, the expression profiles of the MMR proteins did not correlate with clinical outcome measures such as disease relapse or death ( p > 0.05). MCC appears to be a malignancy characterized by low-level MMR rather than completely deficient MMR in a subset of cases, predominantly affecting MCPyV-negative tumors. Future studies will establish whether this subset of MCC patients respond better to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Mechanisms of Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Blockade: Why Does Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy Not Work for All Patients?

          The emergence of immune checkpoint blockade therapies over the last decade has transformed cancer treatment in a wide range of tumor types. Unprecedented and durable clinical responses in difficult-to-treat cancer histologies have been observed. However, despite these promising long-term responses, the majority of patients fail to respond to immune checkpoint blockade, demonstrating primary resistance. Additionally, many of those who initially respond to treatment eventually experience relapse secondary to acquired resistance. Both primary and acquired resistance are a result of complex and constantly evolving interactions between cancer cells and the immune system. Many mechanisms of resistance have been characterized to date, and more continue to be uncovered. By elucidating and targeting mechanisms of resistance, treatments can be tailored to improve clinical outcomes. This review will discuss the landscape of immune checkpoint blockade response data, different resistance mechanisms, and potential therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Genetic diversity of tumors with mismatch repair deficiency influences anti–PD-1 immunotherapy response

            Tumors with mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-d) are characterized by sequence alterations in microsatellites and can accumulate thousands of mutations. This high mutational burden renders tumors immunogenic and sensitive to programmed cell death–1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors. Yet, despite their tumor immunogenicity, patients with MMR-deficient tumors experience highly variable responses, and roughly half are refractory to treatment. We present experimental and clinical evidence showing that the degree of microsatellite instability (MSI) and resultant mutational load, in part, underlies the variable response to PD-1 blockade immunotherapy in MMR-d human and mouse tumors. The extent of response is particularly associated with the accumulation of insertion-deletion (indel) mutational load. This study provides a rationale for the genome-wide characterization of MSI intensity and mutational load to better profile responses to anti–PD-1 immunotherapy across MMR-deficient human cancers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              ARID1A deficiency promotes mutability and potentiates therapeutic antitumor immunity unleashed by immune checkpoint blockade

              ARID1A (the AT-rich interaction domain 1A, also known as BAF250a) is one of the most commonly mutated genes in cancer1,2. The majority of ARID1A mutations are inactivating mutations and lead to loss of ARID1A expression 3 , which makes ARID1A a poor therapeutic target. Therefore, it is of clinical importance to identify molecular consequences of ARID1A deficiency that create therapeutic vulnerabilities in ARID1A-mutant tumors. In a proteomic screen, we found that ARID1A interacts with mismatch repair (MMR) protein MSH2. ARID1A recruited MSH2 to chromatin during DNA replication and promoted MMR. Conversely, ARID1A inactivation compromised MMR and increased mutagenesis. ARID1A deficiency correlated with microsatellite instability genomic signature and a predominant C>T mutation pattern and increased mutation load across multiple human cancer types. Tumors formed by an ARID1A-deficient ovarian cancer cell line in syngeneic mice displayed increased mutation load, elevated numbers of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and PD-L1 expression. Notably, treatment with anti-PD-L1 antibody reduced tumor burden and prolonged survival of mice bearing ARID1A-deficient but not ARID1A-wild-type ovarian tumors. Together, these results suggest ARID1A deficiency contributes to impaired MMR and mutator phenotype in cancer, and may cooperate with immune checkpoint blockade therapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Cancers (Basel)
                Cancers (Basel)
                cancers
                Cancers
                MDPI
                2072-6694
                21 May 2021
                June 2021
                : 13
                : 11
                : 2524
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44791 Bochum, Germany; m.skrygan@ 123456klinikum-bochum.de (M.S.); laura.susok@ 123456klinikum-bochum.de (L.S.); markus.stuecker@ 123456klinikum-bochum.de (M.S.); thomas.meyer@ 123456klinikum-bochum.de (T.M.); eggert.stockfleth@ 123456klinikum-bochum.de (E.S.)
                [2 ]Institute of Pathology, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44789 Bochum, Germany; andrea.tannapfel@ 123456pathologie-bochum.de (A.T.); markus.vogt@ 123456pathologie-bochum.de (M.V.)
                [3 ]Translational Skin Cancer Research, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Department of Dermatology, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; j.becker@ 123456dkfz-heidelberg.de
                [4 ]Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
                [5 ]National Reference Center for Papilloma- and Polyomaviruses, Institute of Virology, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany; ulrike.wieland@ 123456uni-koeln.de (U.W.); steffi.silling@ 123456uk-koeln.de (S.S.)
                [6 ]Department of Pathology, Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, 28205 Bremen, Germany; klaus.junker@ 123456klinikum-bremen-mitte.de
                [7 ]Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurances (IPA), Ruhr-University Bochum, 44789 Bochum, Germany; kaefferlein@ 123456ipa-dguv.de (H.U.K.); bruening@ 123456ipa-dguv.de (T.B.); lang@ 123456ipa-dguv.de (K.L.)
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: thilo.gambichler@ 123456klinikum-bochum.de (T.G.); n.aburached@ 123456yahoo.de (N.A.R.); Tel.: +49-234-509-6073 (N.A.R.)
                [†]

                Equally contributed.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6853-0743
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9183-653X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3957-5587
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9555-3876
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5150-4979
                Article
                cancers-13-02524
                10.3390/cancers13112524
                8196722
                34063983
                e7df53f7-62ca-4403-9d2a-23199150943d
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 10 April 2021
                : 16 May 2021
                Categories
                Article

                merkel cell carcinoma,merkel cell polyomavirus,mismatch repair deficiency,microsatellite instability,immune checkpoint inhibitors,immunotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article