25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Is there an Asian idiom of distress? Somatic symptoms in female Japanese and Korean students.

      Archives of psychiatric nursing
      Adult, Analysis of Variance, Asian Continental Ancestry Group, ethnology, Attitude to Health, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Cultural Diversity, Depression, diagnosis, Female, Humans, Japan, epidemiology, Korea, Longitudinal Studies, Models, Psychological, Nursing Methodology Research, Psychiatric Nursing, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychophysiologic Disorders, prevention & control, Regression Analysis, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Psychological, Students, psychology, Universities, Women

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The term 'idiom of distress' is used to describe culturally specific experiences of suffering. Most of these studies have been conducted with small groups, making comparison of symptom profiles difficult. Female undergraduate and graduate students in Japan (n = 50) and Korea (n = 61) completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and 7-day daily reports of their experiences of 46 somatic symptoms. Between-culture comparisons revealed that BDI scores did not differ; however, the Korean women had significantly higher somatic distress means than the Japanese women. Despite the higher Korean distress mean, regression analysis showed that somatic distress explained 30% of the variance of BDI score for the Japanese but only 22% of the variance for the Koreans. Within-culture comparisons showed that both high-BDI Japanese and Koreans had 19 somatic distress symptoms with significantly higher means than their low-BDI counterparts; 11 somatic symptoms were shared by the two groups. Multidimensional scaling matrices were used to compare symptom proximities and revealed cultural differences. The problems with using broad racial categories in clinical research, the clinical significance of these findings, and the implications for psychiatric nursing assessment and practice are discussed.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article