35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential: From Laboratory to Clinic

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) represents the synchronous firing of a population of electrically stimulated auditory nerve fibers. It can be directly recorded on a surgically exposed nerve trunk in animals or from an intra-cochlear electrode of a cochlear implant. In the past two decades, the eCAP has been widely recorded in both animals and clinical patient populations using different testing paradigms. This paper provides an overview of recording methodologies and response characteristics of the eCAP, as well as its potential applications in research and clinical situations. Relevant studies are reviewed and implications for clinicians are discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references158

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

          Speech recognition was measured as a function of spectral resolution (number of spectral channels) and speech-to-noise ratio in normal-hearing (NH) and cochlear-implant (CI) listeners. Vowel, consonant, word, and sentence recognition were measured in five normal-hearing listeners, ten listeners with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant, and nine listeners with the Advanced Bionics Clarion cochlear implant. Recognition was measured as a function of the number of spectral channels (noise bands or electrodes) at signal-to-noise ratios of + 15, + 10, +5, 0 dB, and in quiet. Performance with three different speech processing strategies (SPEAK, CIS, and SAS) was similar across all conditions, and improved as the number of electrodes increased (up to seven or eight) for all conditions. For all noise levels, vowel and consonant recognition with the SPEAK speech processor did not improve with more than seven electrodes, while for normal-hearing listeners, performance continued to increase up to at least 20 channels. Speech recognition on more difficult speech materials (word and sentence recognition) showed a marginally significant increase in Nucleus-22 listeners from seven to ten electrodes. The average implant score on all processing strategies was poorer than scores of NH listeners with similar processing. However, the best CI scores were similar to the normal-hearing scores for that condition (up to seven channels). CI listeners with the highest performance level increased in performance as the number of electrodes increased up to seven, while CI listeners with low levels of speech recognition did not increase in performance as the number of electrodes was increased beyond four. These results quantify the effect of number of spectral channels on speech recognition in noise and demonstrate that most CI subjects are not able to fully utilize the spectral information provided by the number of electrodes used in their implant.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The basic mechanism for the electrical stimulation of the nervous system.

            F. Rattay (1999)
            Neural signals can be generated or blocked by extracellular electrodes or magnetic coils. New results about artificial excitation are based on a compartmental model of a target neuron and its equivalent electrical network, as well as on the theory of the generalized activating function. The analysis shows that: (i) in most cases, the origin of artificial excitation is within the axon and the soma is much more difficult to excite; (ii) within the central nervous system, positive and negative threshold currents essentially depend on the position and orientation of the neurons relative to the applied electric field; (iii) in several cases, stimulation with positive currents is easier; and (iv) it should be possible to excite synaptic activity without the generation of propagating action potentials. Furthermore, the theory of the generalized activating function gives hints to understanding the blockage of neural activity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.

              The latest-generation cochlear implant devices provide many deaf patients with good speech recognition in quiet listening conditions. However, speech recognition deteriorates rapidly as the level of background noise increases. Previous studies have shown that, for cochlear implant users, the absence of fine spectro-temporal cues may contribute to poorer performance in noise, especially when the noise is dynamic (e.g., competing speaker or modulated noise). Here we report on sentence recognition by cochlear implant users and by normal-hearing subjects listening to an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant, in the presence of steady or square-wave modulated speech-shaped noise. Implant users were tested using their everyday, clinically assigned speech processors. In the acoustic simulation, normal-hearing listeners were tested for different degrees of spectral resolution (16, eight, or four channels) and spectral smearing (carrier filter slopes of -24 or -6 dB/octave). For modulated noise, normal-hearing listeners experienced significant release from masking when the original, unprocessed speech was presented (which preserved the spectro-temporal fine structure), while cochlear implant users experienced no release from masking. As the spectral resolution was reduced, normal-hearing listeners' release from masking gradually diminished. Release from masking was further reduced as the degree of spectral smearing increased. Interestingly, the mean speech recognition thresholds of implant users were very close to those of normal-hearing subjects listening to four-channel spectrally smeared noise-band speech. Also, the best cochlear implant listeners performed like normal-hearing subjects listening to eight- to 16-channel spectrally smeared noise-band speech. These findings suggest that implant users' susceptibility to noise may be caused by the reduced spectral resolution and the high degree of spectral smearing associated with channel interaction. Efforts to improve the effective number of spectral channels as well as reduce channel interactions may improve implant performance in noise, especially for temporally modulated noise.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neurosci
                Front Neurosci
                Front. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-4548
                1662-453X
                23 June 2017
                2017
                : 11
                : 339
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Center for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital Omaha, NE, United States
                [2] 2Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, NC, United States
                [3] 3Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University St. Louis, MO, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Oliver Adunka, The Ohio State University Columbus, United States

                Reviewed by: Alex Arts, University of Michigan Health System, United States; John A. Ferraro, University of Kansas Medical Center, United States

                *Correspondence: Shuman He Shuman.He@ 123456boystown.org

                This article was submitted to Auditory Cognitive Neuroscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience

                Article
                10.3389/fnins.2017.00339
                5481377
                28154520
                e8021b67-e2fa-4753-a02c-0c54e763e3b5
                Copyright © 2017 He, Teagle and Buchman.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 27 March 2017
                : 30 May 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 14, Tables: 0, Equations: 1, References: 164, Pages: 20, Words: 16787
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders 10.13039/100000055
                Award ID: 1R03DC013153
                Funded by: National Institute of General Medical Sciences 10.13039/100000057
                Award ID: 5P20 GM109023
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Review

                Neurosciences
                electrically evoked compound action potential,stimulating paradigm,clinical application,auditory nerve,cochlear implant outcome

                Comments

                Comment on this article