54
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Given the extensive evidence base for the efficacy of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), researchers have started to explore the mechanisms underlying their therapeutic effects on psychological outcomes, using methods of mediation analysis. No known studies have systematically reviewed and statistically integrated mediation studies in this field. The present study aimed to systematically review mediation studies in the literature on mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs), to identify potential psychological mechanisms underlying MBCT and MBSR's effects on psychological functioning and wellbeing, and evaluate the strength and consistency of evidence for each mechanism. For the identified mechanisms with sufficient evidence, quantitative synthesis using two-stage meta-analytic structural equation modelling (TSSEM) was used to examine whether these mechanisms mediate the impact of MBIs on clinical outcomes. This review identified strong, consistent evidence for cognitive and emotional reactivity, moderate and consistent evidence for mindfulness, rumination, and worry, and preliminary but insufficient evidence for self-compassion and psychological flexibility as mechanisms underlying MBIs. TSSEM demonstrated evidence for mindfulness, rumination and worry as significant mediators of the effects of MBIs on mental health outcomes. Most reviewed mediation studies have several key methodological shortcomings which preclude robust conclusions regarding mediation. However, they provide important groundwork on which future studies could build.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Clin Psychol Rev
          Clinical psychology review
          1873-7811
          0272-7358
          Apr 2015
          : 37
          Affiliations
          [1 ] School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, East Sussex, BN1 9QH, UK; Sussex Mindfulness Centre, Research and Development Directorate, Hove, BN3 7HZ, UK.
          [2 ] Sussex Mindfulness Centre, Research and Development Directorate, Hove, BN3 7HZ, UK; Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, BN3 7HZ, UK.
          [3 ] School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, East Sussex, BN1 9QH, UK.
          [4 ] School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, East Sussex, BN1 9QH, UK; Sussex Mindfulness Centre, Research and Development Directorate, Hove, BN3 7HZ, UK. Electronic address: kate.cavanagh@sussex.ac.uk.
          Article
          S0272-7358(15)00019-7
          10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.006
          25689576
          e8420503-8f73-4b5e-8e7c-ed89be8be571
          Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
          History

          Mechanisms,Mediation,Mental health,Meta-analysis,Mindfulness,Structural equation modelling

          Comments

          Comment on this article