13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      BNP or NTproBNP? A clinician's perspective

      ,
      International Journal of Cardiology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Existing literature on two natriuretic peptides--B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and amino terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP)--is overwhelming. Both peptides are acknowledged markers for cardiac dysfunction. Most of the sources present data on either BNP or NTproBNP making the comparison difficult. This paper focuses on reviewing studies directly comparing two peptides in the setting of chronic and acute heart failure (HF) and coronary artery disease. Many concomitant diseases influence these two peptides to varying extent. These characteristics should be taken into consideration when interpreting results. For most practical purposes, BNP and NTproBNP are interchangeable, and can be used based on local preferences and availability. NTproBNP seems to be more advantageous for diagnosing mild HF or asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          International Journal of Cardiology
          International Journal of Cardiology
          Elsevier BV
          01675273
          September 2008
          September 2008
          : 129
          : 1
          : 5-14
          Article
          10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.12.093
          18378336
          e86742f7-e997-4328-aa39-69906095cdf1
          © 2008

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article