4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab (pembro) alone or in combination with chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal (G/GEJ) cancer: Long-term follow up from KEYNOTE-059.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          4009

          Background: Interim analysis of a global, phase 2 KEYNOTE-059 study (NCT02335411) reported manageable safety and promising antitumor activity for pembro alone or pembro + chemo in pts with G/GEJ cancer. Here we report long-term efficacy and safety data of all cohorts. Methods: Pts with recurrent or metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma were enrolled in 3 cohorts. Cohort 1 pts (PD-L1positive or negative) received pembro alone after ≥2 prior lines of therapy. Cohort 2 pts (PD-L1positive or negative) received pembro + cisplatin (80 mg/m 2 day 1) + 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m 2 days 1-5 Q3W) or capecitabine (in Japan only, 1000 mg/m 2 twice daily) as first-line. Cohort 3 pts (PD-L1positive, combined positive score ≥1% using the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay) received pembro alone as first-line. All pts received pembro 200 mg Q3W for up to 2 years. End points included safety, ORR, DOR, and OS. Results: At data cutoff (Aug 8, 2018), median (range) follow-up was 6 (1-38), 14 (2-40), and 21 (2-36) months for cohorts 1 (n = 259), 2 (n = 25), and 3 (n = 31), respectively. In cohort 1, confirmed ORR (95% CI) was 11.6% (8-16) overall, 15.5% (10-22) in PD-L1positive, and 6.4% (3-13) in PD-L1negative tumors. In cohort 2, confirmed ORR was 60.0% (39-79) overall, 73.3% (45-92) in PD-L1positive, and 37.5% (9-76) in PD-L1negative tumors. In cohort 3, confirmed ORR was 25.8% (12-45). Median (range) DOR in months was 16.1 (2-35+), 4.6 (3-37+), and not reached (2.1-32.5+) in cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. OS at 1 year/2 years was 24.6%/12.5%, 52%/32%, and 63.6%/40.1% in cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In cohorts 1, 2, and 3, grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) incidence was 46 (18%), 20 (80%), and 8 (26%) respectively. TRAEs led to discontinuation in 6 (2%) and 3 (12%) pts in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively, and to death in 2 (1%) pts in cohort 1. No TRAEs led to discontinuation or death in cohort 3. Conclusions: These updated results demonstrate manageable safety, durable clinically meaningful activity of pembro in heavily pretreated pts, and promising efficacy of first-line pembro (alone or + chemo) in pts with advanced G/GEJ cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02335411.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          JCO
          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          May 20 2019
          May 20 2019
          : 37
          : 15_suppl
          : 4009
          Affiliations
          [1 ]David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA;
          [2 ]Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN;
          [3 ]University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL;
          [4 ]Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN;
          [5 ]Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan;
          [6 ]Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile;
          [7 ]The Oncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center at Tel-Hashomer, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel;
          [8 ]National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan;
          [9 ]Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel;
          [10 ]Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY;
          [11 ]Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD;
          [12 ]Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;
          [13 ]Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan;
          [14 ]Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;
          [15 ]Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ;
          [16 ]Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT;
          Article
          10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.4009
          e8730397-128c-46bb-8377-00c3c57f53d7
          © 2019
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article