14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      In Vitro Characterization of Valproic Acid, ATRA, and Cytarabine Used for Disease-Stabilization in Human Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Antiproliferative Effects of Drugs on Endothelial and Osteoblastic Cells and Altered Release of Angioregulatory Mediators by Endothelial Cells

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The combined use of the histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid (VPA), the retinoic acid receptor- α agonist all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), and the deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase- α inhibitor cytarabine (Ara-C) is now considered for disease-stabilizing treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Leukemogenesis and leukemia cell chemoresistance seem to be supported by neighbouring stromal cells in the bone marrow, and we have therefore investigated the effects of these drugs on primary human endothelial cells and the osteoblastic Cal72 cell line. The results show that VPA and Ara-C have antiproliferative effects, and the antiproliferative/cytotoxic effect of Ara-C was seen at low concentrations corresponding to serum levels found during low-dose in vivo treatment. Furthermore, in functional assays of endothelial migration and tube formation VPA elicited an antiangiogenic effect, whereas ATRA elicited a proangiogenic effect. Finally, VPA and ATRA altered the endothelial cell release of angiogenic mediators; ATRA increased levels of CXCL8, PDGF-AA, and VEGF-D, while VPA decreased VEGF-D and PDGF-AA/BB levels and both drugs reduced MMP-2 levels. Several of these mediators can enhance AML cell proliferation and/or are involved in AML-induced bone marrow angiogenesis, and direct pharmacological effects on stromal cells may thus indirectly contribute to the overall antileukemic activity of this triple drug combination.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Histone deacetylase is a target of valproic acid-mediated cellular differentiation.

          Valproic acid (VPA), a well-established therapy for seizures and bipolar disorder, has recently been shown to inhibit histone deacetylases (HDACs). Similar to more widely studied HDAC inhibitors, VPA can cause growth arrest and induce differentiation of transformed cells in culture. Whether this effect of VPA is through inhibition of HDACs or modulation of another target of VPA has not been tested. We have used a series of VPA analogs to establish a pharmacological profile for HDAC inhibition. We find that VPA and its analogs inhibit multiple HDACs from class I and class II (but not HDAC6 or HDAC10) with a characteristic order of potency in vitro. These analogs also induce hyperacetylation of core histones H3 and H4 in intact cells with an order of potency that parallels in vitro inhibition. VPA and VPA analogs induce differentiation in hematopoietic cell lines in a p21-dependent manner, and the order of potency for induction of differentiation parallels the potencies for inhibition in vitro, as well as for acetylation of histones associated with the p21 promoter, supporting the argument that differentiation caused by VPA is mediated through inhibition of HDACs. These findings provide additional evidence that VPA, a well-tolerated, orally administered drug with extensive clinical experience, may serve as an effective chemotherapeutic agent through targeting of HDACs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Induction of differentiation of the human promyelocytic leukemia cell line (HL-60) by retinoic acid.

            The HL-60 cell line, derived from a patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia, proliferates continuously in suspension culture and consists predominantly (greater than 90%) of promyelocytes. These cells can be induced to differentiate to morphologically and functionally mature granulocytes by incubation with a wide variety of compounds, including butyrate and hypoxanthine and polar planar compounds such as dimethyl sulfoxide and hexamethylene bisacetamide. We have now found that retinoic acid (all-trans-retinoic acid) induces differentiation (as measured morphologically and by the ability to reduce nitroblue tetrazolium) of HL-60 at concentrations as low as 1 nM. Maximal differentiation (approximately 90%) occurs at 1 micro M, a concentration 1/500th to 1/160,000th the concentrations of butyrate (0.5 mM) and dimethyl sulfoxide (160 mM) that promote a similar increase in differentiation. Continuous exposure to retinoic acid is necessary for optimal differentiation, with the percentage of mature cells in the culture directly related to the length of time of exposure to retinoic acid. Retinoic acid and 13-cis-retinoic acid are equally effective in inducing differentiation of HL-60. Retinol (vitamin A), retinal, and retinyl acetate are approximately 1/1000th less potent. This study suggests that retinoids could provide a therapeutic tool in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia, a disease that has been looked upon as primarily involving a block in myeloid differentiation, and indicates that retinoids, in addition to their well-characterized involvement in epithelial cell differentiation, may also be involved in the differentiation of certain hematopoietic cells.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Use of multiple assay endpoints to investigate the effects of incubation time, dose of toxin, and plating density in cell-based cytotoxicity assays.

              Here we show the results of comparing cell viability, cytotoxicity, and apoptosis assays for measuring the time- and dose-dependent toxic effects of tamoxifen on HepG2 cells. The quantitation of adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP), 5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4,5- dimethylthiazolyl)-3-(4-sulfophenyl) tetrazolium, inner salt (MTS) tetrazolium reduction, and resazurin reduction methods used to estimate the number of viable cells all showed a similar trend of decreased cell viability after longer periods of tamoxifen exposure to HepG2 cells. The release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as a marker for cells with a compromised membrane and the increase in caspase-3/7 activity as a marker for apoptosis were both shown to increase using the same tamoxifen exposure conditions that caused a decrease in HepG2 cell viability. The longer the duration of exposure of tamoxifen, the lower the concentration required to kill or induce apoptosis in HepG2 cells. In contrast, there was no change in LDH release from HL-60 cells using conditions of vinblastine treatment that caused an increase in caspase activity and a decrease in ATP content, suggesting a difference in the mechanism of cell death between the two model systems. Both the density of parent stock cultures used as a source of cells to prepare assay plates and the density of cells per well in the assay plates were demonstrated to be factors than can influence the apparent potency of a toxin in viability, toxicity, and apoptosis assays. These results illustrate the importance of understanding the kinetics and mechanism of cell death of each in vitro model system as prerequisites for choosing the most appropriate assay method.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Leuk Res Treatment
                Leuk Res Treatment
                LRT
                Leukemia Research and Treatment
                Hindawi Publishing Corporation
                2090-3219
                2090-3227
                2014
                8 January 2014
                : 2014
                : 143479
                Affiliations
                1Department of Clinical Science, Hematology Section, University of Bergen, 5021 Bergen, Norway
                2Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
                3Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Norway
                4Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway
                Author notes
                *Kimberley J. Hatfield: mmakh@ 123456k2.uib.no

                Academic Editor: Judith E. Karp

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3707-1788
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0725-7242
                Article
                10.1155/2014/143479
                3910457
                24527217
                e88ff953-073f-4690-b87a-a70ae132610e
                Copyright © 2014 Hilde Kvestad et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 28 July 2013
                : 28 October 2013
                Categories
                Research Article

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article