11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Utility and Feasibility of Teleophthalmology Using a Smartphone-Based Ophthalmic Camera in Screening Camps in Nepal

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Purpose:

          To determine whether use of a mobile device-based ophthalmic camera by ophthalmic technicians (OTs) in village screening camps in Nepal followed by remote image interpretation by an ophthalmologist can improve detection of ocular pathology and medical decision-making.

          Design:

          Evaluation of mobile device-based ophthalmic camera through study of before and after clinical decision-making.

          Methods:

          One hundred forty patients over 18 years of age presenting to remote screening camps with best-corrected visual acuity ≤20/60 in one or both eyes were enrolled. Participants were examined by an OT with direct ophthalmoscopy. The technician recorded a diagnosis for each eye and a disposition for each patient. Patients then had anterior segment and fundus photos and/or videos taken using a smartphone-based ophthalmic camera system. Photos and videos were uploaded to a secure, HIPAA-compliant, cloud-based server, and interpreted by masked ophthalmologists from XXX, who independently recorded diagnoses and a disposition for each patient.

          Results:

          The diagnoses given by OTs and ophthalmologists differed in 42.4% of eyes. Diagnosis agreement was highest for cataract [k = 0.732, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65–0.81], but much lower for posterior segment (retina/optic nerve) pathology (k = 0.057, 95% CI −0.03–0.14). Ophthalmologists and OTs suggested different dispositions for 68.6% of patients. Agreement was highest for cataract extraction (k = 0.623, 95% CI 0.49–0.75), whereas agreement for referral to XXX was lower (k = 0.12, 95% CI 0.00–0.24).

          Conclusions:

          Remote ophthalmologist consultation utilizing a mobile device ophthalmic camera system is logistically feasible, easily scalable, and capable of capturing high-quality images in the setting of rural eye screening camps. Although OTs are well equipped to identify and triage anterior segment pathology, this technology may be helpful in the detection of and referral for posterior segment pathology.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The global inverse care law: a distorted map of blindness.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            A novel smartphone ophthalmic imaging adapter: User feasibility studies in Hyderabad, India

            Aim of Study: To evaluate the ability of ancillary health staff to use a novel smartphone imaging adapter system (EyeGo, now known as Paxos Scope) to capture images of sufficient quality to exclude emergent eye findings. Secondary aims were to assess user and patient experiences during image acquisition, interuser reproducibility, and subjective image quality. Materials and Methods: The system captures images using a macro lens and an indirect ophthalmoscopy lens coupled with an iPhone 5S. We conducted a prospective cohort study of 229 consecutive patients presenting to L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India. Primary outcome measure was mean photographic quality (FOTO-ED study 1–5 scale, 5 best). 210 patients and eight users completed surveys assessing comfort and ease of use. For 46 patients, two users imaged the same patient's eyes sequentially. For 182 patients, photos taken with the EyeGo system were compared to images taken by existing clinic cameras: a BX 900 slit-lamp with a Canon EOS 40D Digital Camera and an FF 450 plus Fundus Camera with VISUPAC™ Digital Imaging System. Images were graded post hoc by a reviewer blinded to diagnosis. Results: Nine users acquired 719 useable images and 253 videos of 229 patients. Mean image quality was ≥ 4.0/5.0 (able to exclude subtle findings) for all users. 8/8 users and 189/210 patients surveyed were comfortable with the EyeGo device on a 5-point Likert scale. For 21 patients imaged with the anterior adapter by two users, a weighted κ of 0.597 (95% confidence interval: 0.389–0.806) indicated moderate reproducibility. High level of agreement between EyeGo and existing clinic cameras (92.6% anterior, 84.4% posterior) was found. Conclusion: The novel, ophthalmic imaging system is easily learned by ancillary eye care providers, well tolerated by patients, and captures high-quality images of eye findings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Training time and quality of smartphone-based anterior segment screening in rural India

              Objective We aimed at evaluating the ability of individuals without ophthalmologic training to quickly capture high-quality images of the cornea by using a smartphone and low-cost anterior segment imaging adapter (the “EyeGo” prototype). Methods Seven volunteers photographed 1,502 anterior segments from 751 high school students in Varni, India, by using an iPhone 5S with an attached EyeGo adapter. Primary outcome measures were median photograph quality of the cornea and anterior segment of the eye (validated Fundus Photography vs Ophthalmoscopy Trial Outcomes in the Emergency Department [FOTO-ED] study; 1–5 scale; 5, best) and the time required to take each photograph. Volunteers were surveyed on their familiarity with using a smartphone (1–5 scale; 5, very comfortable) and comfort in assessing problems with the eye (1–5 scale; 5, very comfortable). Binomial logistic regression was performed using image quality (low quality: <4; high quality: ≥4) as the dependent variable and age, comfort using a smartphone, and comfort in assessing problems with the eye as independent variables. Results Six of the seven volunteers captured high-quality (median ≥4/5) images with a median time of ≤25 seconds per eye for all the eyes screened. Four of the seven volunteers demonstrated significant reductions in time to acquire photographs (P1=0.01, P5=0.01, P6=0.01, and P7=0.01), and three of the seven volunteers demonstrated significant improvements in the quality of photographs between the first 100 and last 100 eyes screened (P1<0.001, P2<0.001, and P6<0.01). Self-reported comfort using a smartphone (odds ratio [OR] =1.25; 95% CI =1.13 to 1.39) and self-reported comfort diagnosing eye conditions (OR =1.17; 95% CI =1.07 to 1.29) were significantly associated with an ability to take a high-quality image (≥4/5). There was a nonsignificant association between younger age and ability to take a high-quality image. Conclusion Individuals without ophthalmic training were able to quickly capture a high-quality magnified view of the anterior segment of the eye by using a smartphone with an attached imaging adapter.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)
                Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)
                ap9
                Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)
                Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
                2162-0989
                Jan-Feb 2020
                03 February 2020
                : 9
                : 1
                : 54-58
                Affiliations
                []John A. Moran Eye Center at University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
                []Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
                []Himalayan Cataract Project, Waterbury, VT
                [§ ]Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
                []Los Altos Eye Physicians, Los Altos, CA
                [|| ]Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Nepal
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Suman Thapa, Professor of Ophthalmology, Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Ring Road, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal. E-mail: sumansthapa@ 123456yahoo.com and David Myung, Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute at Stanford, Palo Alto, CA 94304. E-mail: djmyung@ 123456stanford.edu .
                Article
                APJO-2019-311
                10.1097/01.APO.0000617936.16124.ba
                7004467
                31990747
                e8b8db07-0376-4cce-9241-30a01d8a2917
                Copyright © 2020 Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

                History
                : 02 February 2019
                : 18 July 2019
                Categories
                Original Clinical Study
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                global ophthalmology,outreach,telemedicine,teleophthalmology

                Comments

                Comment on this article