33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Will emergency and surgical patients participate in and complete alcohol interventions? A systematic review

      research-article
      1 , 2 , , 3 , 4 , 1 , 2
      BMC Surgery
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In the everyday surgical life, staff may experience that patients with Alcohol Use Disorders (AUDs) seem reluctant to participate in alcohol intervention programs. The objective was therefore to assess acceptance of screening and intervention as well as adherence to the intervention program among emergency department (ED) and surgical patients with AUDs.

          Methods

          A systematic literature search was followed by extraction of acceptance and adherence rates in ED and surgical patients. Numbers needed to screen (NNS) were calculated. Subgroup analyses were carried out based on different study characteristics.

          Results

          The literature search revealed 33 relevant studies. Of these, 31 were randomized trials, 28 were conducted in EDs and 31 evaluated the effect of brief alcohol intervention. Follow-up was mainly conducted after six and/or twelve months.

          Four in five ED patients accepted alcohol screening and two in three accepted participation in intervention. In surgical patients, two in three accepted screening and the intervention acceptance rate was almost 100%. The adherence rate was above 60% for up to twelve months in both ED and surgical patients. The NNS to identify one eligible AUD patient and to get one eligible patient to accept participation in alcohol intervention varied from a few up to 70 patients.

          The rates did not differ between randomized and non-randomized trials, brief and intensive interventions or validated and self-reported alcohol consumption. Adherence rates were not affected by patients' group allocation and type of follow-up.

          Conclusions

          Most emergency and surgical patients with AUD accept participation in alcohol screening and interventions and complete the intervention program.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Michigan alcoholism screening test: the quest for a new diagnostic instrument.

          M L Selzer (1971)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The CAGE questionnaire: validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of preoperative smoking intervention on postoperative complications: a randomised clinical trial.

              Smokers are at higher risk of cardiopulmonary and wound-related postoperative complications than non-smokers. Our aim was to investigate the effect of preoperative smoking intervention on the frequency of postoperative complications in patients undergoing hip and knee replacement. We did a randomised trial in three hospitals in Denmark. 120 patients were randomly assigned 6-8 weeks before scheduled surgery to either the control (n=60) or smoking intervention (60) group. Smoking intervention was counselling and nicotine replacement therapy, and either smoking cessation or at least 50% smoking reduction. An assessor, who was masked to the intervention, registered the occurrence of cardiopulmonary, renal, neurological, or surgical complications and duration of hospital admittance. The main analysis was by intention to treat. Eight controls and four patients from the intervention group were excluded from the final analysis because their operations were either postponed or cancelled. Thus, 52 and 56 patients, respectively, were analysed for outcome. The overall complication rate was 18% in the smoking intervention group and 52% in controls (p=0.0003). The most significant effects of intervention were seen for wound-related complications (5% vs 31%, p=0.001), cardiovascular complications (0% vs 10%, p=0.08), and secondary surgery (4% vs 15%, p=0.07). The median length of stay was 11 days (range 7-55) in the intervention group and 13 days (8-65) in the control group. An effective smoking intervention programme 6-8 weeks before surgery reduces postoperative morbidity, and we recommend, on the basis of our results, this programme be adopted.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Surg
                BMC Surgery
                BioMed Central
                1471-2482
                2011
                23 September 2011
                : 11
                : 26
                Affiliations
                [1 ]WHO Collaborating Centre for Evidence-based Health Promotion in Hospitals and Health Services, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
                [2 ]Clinical Alcohol Research, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Sweden
                [3 ]Alcohol and Drug Research Western Norway, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Research Unit for General Practice, Uni Health, Bergen, Norway
                [4 ]Orthopaedic Department, Skane University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Sweden
                Article
                1471-2482-11-26
                10.1186/1471-2482-11-26
                3189859
                21943382
                e8cfe434-ad08-4123-94d8-fb5a4da97288
                Copyright ©2011 Pedersen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 14 January 2011
                : 23 September 2011
                Categories
                Research Article

                Surgery
                Surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article