7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Measuring the Quality of Life among Head-and/or-Neck Cancer Patients with Oral Mucositis Using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General in Jordan

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          Quality of life (QOL) in cancer patients can be influenced by the presence of medical conditions, such as oral mucositis (OM). There is still limited knowledge about this issue among patients in Jordan, and this could be related to the absence of research instruments testing QOL among cancer patients with OM. This study measured the QOL among cancer patients using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), Arabic version.

          Methods:

          This was a cross-sectional study on 118 head-and/or-neck cancer patients with OM in Jordan. Data were submitted to measures of normality, reliability, and validity using exploratory factor analysis. The study also measured QOL among the study sample.

          Results:

          FACT-G demonstrated good internal consistency reliability and validity. Factor analysis indicated the presence of four factors explained by 24 items representing a valid FACT-G, Arabic version. Scores reflected low QOL compared to reported normative values in the literature. The values used to compare findings from this study were extracted from international literature; no similar values were present in published literature.

          Conclusions:

          FACT-G, Arabic version, is valid and reliable when applied to this study population. Further testing is recommended, which would include the establishment of normative values.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Little Jiffy, Mark Iv

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: differences between improvement and worsening.

            There has been increased recent attention to the clinical meaningfulness of group change scores on health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaires. It has been assumed that improvements and declines of comparable magnitude have the same meaning or value. We assessed 308 cancer patients with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) and a Global Rating of Change. Patients were classified into five levels of change in HRQL and its dimensions based upon their responses to retrospective ratings of change after 2 months: sizably worse, minimally worse, no change, minimally better, and sizably better. Raw score and standardized score changes on the FACT-G subscales and total score were then compared across different categories of patient-rated change. The relationship between actual FACT change scores and retrospective ratings of change was modest but usually statistically significant (r: 0.07 to 0.35). Change scores associated with each retrospective rating category were evaluated to determine estimates of meaningful difference. Patients who reported global worsening of HRQL dimensions had considerably larger change scores than those reporting comparable global improvements. Although related to a ceiling effect, this remained true even after removing cases that began near the ceiling of the questionnaire. Relatively small gains in HRQL have significant value. Comparable declines may be less meaningful, perhaps due to patients' tendency to minimize personal negative evaluations about one's condition. This has important implications for the interpretation of the meaningfulness of change scores in HRQL questionnaires. Factors such as adaptation to disease, response shift, dispositional optimism and the need for signs of clinical improvement may be contributing to the results and should be investigated in future studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Choosing between the EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G for measuring health-related quality of life in cancer clinical research: issues, evidence and recommendations.

              This review aims to assist cancer clinical researchers in choosing between the two most widely used measures of cancer-specific health-related quality of life: the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Information on QLQ-C30 and FACT-G content, scale structure, accessibility and availability was collated from websites and manuals. A systematic review was undertaken to identify all articles reporting on psychometric properties and information to assist interpretability. Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness was rated using a standardised checklist. Instrument properties were compared and contrasted to inform recommendations. Psychometric evidence does not recommend one questionnaire over the other in general. However, there are important differences between the scale structure, social domains and tone that inform choice for any particular study. Where research objectives are concerned with the impact of a specific tumour type, treatment or symptom, choice should be guided by the availability, content, scale structure and psychometric properties of relevant European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer versus Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy modules. Because the FACT-G combines symptoms and concerns within each scale, individual items should always be reviewed within the context of specific research objectives. Where these issues are indecisive, researchers are encouraged to use an algorithm at the end of the current article.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs
                Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs
                APJON
                Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                2347-5625
                2349-6673
                Jul-Sep 2018
                : 5
                : 3
                : 320-326
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Alzaytoonah University of Jordan (ZUJ), Ma'an, Jordan
                [2 ]Department of Nursing, Aisha Bint Al Hussein College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Al Hussein Bin Talal University, Ma'an, Jordan
                [3 ]Nursing Department, Al-Bashir Hospital, Ministry of Health, Amman, Jordan
                [4 ]Department of Dentistry Al Zarqa Hospital, Ministry of Health, Amman, Jordan
                [5 ]Department of Clinical Oncology and Radiation Therapy, Al-Bashir Hospital, Ministry of Health, Amman, Jordan
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Marwa Al Barmawi, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Alzaytoonah University of Jordan (ZUJ), Amman, Jordan Tel: 00962 797774292 E-mail: marwa.alburmawi@ 123456zuj.edu.jo
                Article
                APJON-5-320
                10.4103/apjon.apjon_14_18
                5996588
                29963595
                e8defb0d-0d44-41f0-96fd-47646b5f94b1
                Copyright: © 2018 Ann & Joshua Medical Publishing Co. Ltd

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 31 January 2018
                : 18 March 2018
                Categories
                Original Article

                cancer patients,functional assessment of cancer therapy-general,jordan,oral mucositis,quality of life

                Comments

                Comment on this article