7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Methodological flaws introduce strong bias into molecular analysis of microbial populations.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this study, we report how different cell disruption methods, PCR primers and in silico analyses can seriously bias results from microbial population studies, with consequences for the credibility and reproducibility of the findings. Our results emphasize the pitfalls of commonly used experimental methods that can seriously weaken the interpretation of results.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J. Appl. Microbiol.
          Journal of applied microbiology
          Wiley-Blackwell
          1365-2672
          1364-5072
          Feb 2017
          : 122
          : 2
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Bioprocess-Engineering, Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bio-Economy Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
          [2 ] Institute of Environmental Science, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey.
          [3 ] Department of Geomikrobiologie, Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam, Deutsches Geoforschungszentrum, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam, Germany.
          Article
          10.1111/jam.13365
          27914209
          e90a233b-b338-4fac-af68-d5ef503ed816
          History

          Thermotogae primer,biased results,cell disruption technique,method evaluation,microbial diversity,thermophilic-treated chicken dung

          Comments

          Comment on this article