12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Month of birth and risk of multiple sclerosis: confounding and adjustments

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A month of birth effect on multiple sclerosis (MS) risk has been reported from different countries. Recent critics have suggested that this finding is caused by confounding and that adequately adjusting for year and place of birth would markedly reduce this effect. All inhabitants in Norway are registered in the Norwegian Population Registry (Statistics Norway), making this an ideal area for performing adjusted analyses. Using the entire Norwegian population born between 1930 and 1979 ( n = 2,899,260), we calculated the excess between observed and expected number of births for each month for 6649 Norwegian MS patients, 5711 mothers, 5247 fathers, and 8956 unaffected siblings. The analyses were adjusted for year of birth and place of birth according to the 19 counties in Norway. An unadjusted analysis revealed 13% fewer MS births than expected in February ( P = 0.0015; Bonferroni corrected P = 0.018), 10% more in April ( P = 0.0083; Bonferroni corrected P = 0.0996) and 15% more in December ( P = 0.00058; Bonferroni corrected P = 0.007). Adjustments for both year and place of birth significantly altered our results for February and December, but even after these adjustments there were still 10% more MS births than expected in April ( P = 0.00796; Bonferroni corrected P = 0.096). MS patients had a higher incidence of April births than their siblings (Fisher-exact test; P = 0.011), mothers (Fisher-exact test; P = 0.004), and fathers (Fisher-exact test; P = 0.011) without MS. Adjustments for confounding significantly affected our results. However, even after adjustments, there appears to be a persistent higher than expected frequency of April births in the MS population.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Timing of birth and risk of multiple sclerosis: population based study.

          To determine if risk of multiple sclerosis (MS) is associated with month of birth in countries in the northern hemisphere and if factors related to month of birth interact with genetic risk. Population based study with population and family based controls and a retrospective cohort identified from death certificates. A post hoc pooled analysis was carried out for large northern datasets including Sweden and Denmark. 19 MS clinics in major cities across Canada (Canadian collaborative project on the genetic susceptibility to multiple sclerosis); incident cases of MS from a population based study in the Lothian and Border regions of Scotland; and death records from the UK Registrar General. 17,874 Canadian patients and 11,502 British patients with multiple sclerosis. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. In Canada (n = 17,874) significantly fewer patients with MS were born in November compared with controls from the population census and unaffected siblings. These observations were confirmed in a dataset of British patients (n = 11, 502), in which there was also an increase in the number of births in May. A pooled analysis of datasets from Canada, Great Britain, Denmark, and Sweden (n = 42,045) showed that significantly fewer (8.5%) people with MS were born in November and significantly more (9.1%) were born in May. For recent incident data, the effect of month of birth was most evident in Scotland, where MS prevalence is the highest. Month of birth and risk of MS are associated, more so in familial cases, implying interactions between genes and environment that are related to climate. Such interactions may act during gestation or shortly after birth in individuals born in the northern countries studied.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Low maternal exposure to ultraviolet radiation in pregnancy, month of birth, and risk of multiple sclerosis in offspring: longitudinal analysis

            Objectives To investigate the distribution of month of birth in people with multiple sclerosis in Australia. To use the large regional and seasonal variation in ambient ultraviolet radiation in Australia to explore the association between exposure to ultraviolet radiation during pregnancy and subsequent risk of multiple sclerosis in offspring. Design Data were gathered on birth month and year (1920-1950), sex, and state of birth for all patients surveyed in 1981 in Queensland, Western Australia, New South Wales (including Australian Capital Territory), South Australia, and Hobart (Tasmania). Population denominators were derived from the 1981 census and supplementary birth registration data. A variable for exposure to ambient ultraviolet radiation “at birth” was generated from monthly averages of daily total ambient ultraviolet radiation for each region. Negative binomial regression models were used to investigate exposure to ambient ultraviolet radiation at birth and at various intervals before birth. Setting Patient data from multiple sclerosis prevalence surveys carried out in 1981; 1981 Australian census (giving the total number of people born in Australia and still alive and living in Australia in 1981 by year of birth 1920-50); supplementary Australian birth registration data covering the same birth years by month and state. Participants 1524 patients with multiple sclerosis born in Australia 1920-50 from total population of 2 468 779. Main outcome measure Cumulative incidence rate of multiple sclerosis. Results There was a pattern of risk of multiple sclerosis with month of birth (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.32, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 1.58, P<0.01, for those born in November-December compared with those born in May-June). This pattern mirrored that previously reported in the northern hemisphere. Region of birth was related to risk. After adjustment for region of birth and other factors, there was an inverse association between ambient ultraviolet radiation in the first trimester and risk of multiple sclerosis (with ≥25 erythemal (skin reddening) dose units as reference (that is, adjusted incidence rate ratio=1.00), the rates were 1.54 (1.10 to 2.16) for 20-<25 units; 1.58 (1.12 to 2.22) for 15-<20 units; 1.65 (1.17 to 2.33) for 10-<15 units; 1.65 (1.18 to 2.29) for 5-<10 units; and 1.67 (1.18 to 2.37) for <5 units). After adjustment for this exposure during early pregnancy, there was no residual association between month of birth and multiple sclerosis. Conclusion Region of birth and low maternal exposure to ultraviolet radiation in the first trimester are independently associated with subsequent risk of multiple sclerosis in offspring in Australia.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Confounding Underlies the Apparent Month of Birth Effect in Multiple Sclerosis

              Objective Several groups have reported apparent association between month of birth and multiple sclerosis. We sought to test the extent to which such studies might be confounded by extraneous variables such as year and place of birth. Methods Using national birth statistics from 2 continents, we assessed the evidence for seasonal variations in birth rate and tested the extent to which these are subject to regional and temporal variation. We then established the age and regional origin distribution for a typical multiple sclerosis case collection and determined the false-positive rate expected when comparing such a collection with birth rates estimated by averaging population-specific national statistics. Results We confirm that seasonality in birth rate is ubiquitous and subject to highly significant regional and temporal variations. In the context of this variation we show that birth rates observed in typical case collections are highly likely to deviate significantly from those obtained by the simple unweighted averaging of national statistics. The significant correlations between birth rates and both place (latitude) and time (year of birth) that characterize the general population indicate that the apparent seasonal patterns for month of birth suggested to be specific for multiple sclerosis (increased in the spring and reduced in the winter) are expected by chance alone. Interpretation In the absence of adequate control for confounding factors, such as year and place of birth, our analyses indicate that the previous claims for association of multiple sclerosis with month of birth are probably false positives. ANN NEUROL 2013;73:714–720
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Clin Transl Neurol
                Ann Clin Transl Neurol
                acn3
                Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
                BlackWell Publishing Ltd (Oxford, UK )
                2328-9503
                2328-9503
                February 2014
                04 February 2014
                : 1
                : 2
                : 141-144
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis Competence Centre, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital Bergen, Norway
                [2 ]Kristian Gerhard Jebsen Centre for MS-Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen Bergen, Norway
                [3 ]Department of Neurology, Nordland Hospital Bodø, Norway
                [4 ]Department of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål Oslo, Norway
                [5 ]Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital Lørenskog, Norway
                [6 ]Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo Oslo, Norway
                [7 ]Department of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø Tromsø, Norway
                [8 ]Department of Neurology, University Hospital of North Norway Tromsø, Norway
                [9 ]Department of Neurology, Innlandet Hospital Trust Lillehammer, Norway
                [10 ]Department of Neurology, Molde Hospital Molde, Norway
                [11 ]Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen Bergen, Norway
                Author notes
                Correspondence Øivind Torkildsen, Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis Competence Centre, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen 5021, Norway. Tel: +47 55 97 70 39; Fax: +47 55 97 59 01; E-mail: ofto@ 123456helse-bergen.no , oivind.torkildsen@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                10.1002/acn3.37
                4212485
                e91789f4-c103-4a22-adfd-8201507ce446
                © 2014 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc on behalf of American Neurological Association.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 12 November 2013
                : 07 January 2014
                : 12 January 2014
                Categories
                Brief Communications

                Comments

                Comment on this article