15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Lateral retinacular release combined with MPFL reconstruction for patellofemoral instability: a systematic review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The role of the lateral retinaculum in patellofemoral instability is still debated. Lateral retinacular release (LRR), has been extensively performed in combination with different surgical procedures, including reconstruction of medio-patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). Despite controversial indications, the results from these studies seem promising. The present study conducts a systematic review about current biomechanical and clinical evidence concerning the role of LRR in combination with MPFL reconstruction. We performed a comprehensive literature research, comparing the outcomes of MPFL reconstruction with and without LRR.

          Materials and methods

          This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was performed in August 2020. All articles describing the outcome of isolated MPFL reconstruction alone or in combination with a LRR in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability were considered for inclusion. Only articles reporting data on patients with a minimum of 12-month follow-up were included. Only articles reporting quantitative data under the outcomes of interest were included.

          Results

          A total of 63 articles were eligible for this systematic review, including 2131 knees. The mean follow-up was 40.87 ± 24.1 months. All scores of interests improved in favour of the combined group: Kujala + 3.8% ( P = 0.01), Lysholm + 4.2% ( P = 0.004), Tegner + 0.8 points ( P = 0.04), IKDC + 9.8% ( P = 0.02). The ROM was comparable between the two groups ( P = 0.4). Similarity was found in terms of positivity to the apprehension test ( P = 0.05), rate of complications ( P = 0.1), re-dislocations ( P = 0.8), and revision surgeries ( P = 0.1).

          Conclusion

          There is no evidence that adding a lateral release impacts positively on the outcome of MPFL reconstruction.

          Level of evidence: IV, Systematic review

          Related collections

          Most cited references98

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS).

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later.

            In 1982, the Lysholm score was first published as a physician-administered score in the American Journal of Sports Medicine. The Tegner activity scale was published in 1985. The Lysholm and Tegner scores are valid as patient-administered scores and responsive at early time points after treatment of anterior cruciate ligament tears. Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 1. All patients were treated for an anterior cruciate ligament tear. For responsiveness, the Lysholm score (n = 1075) and Tegner activity level (n = 505) were measured preoperatively and 6, 9, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. For test-retest (n = 50), scores were measured at 2 years postoperatively and again within 4 weeks by questionnaire. For criterion validity (n = 170), patients completed the Short Form-12 and the International Knee Documentation Committee score in addition to Lysholm and Tegner instruments. For all other analyses, preoperative Lysholm score (n = 1783) or Tegner activity levels (n = 687) were collected. There was acceptable test-retest reliability for both the Lysholm (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.9) and Tegner (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.8) scores. The minimum detectable change for Lysholm was 8.9 and for Tegner was 1. The Lysholm demonstrated acceptable internal consistency. The Lysholm correlated with the International Knee Documentation Committee (r = .8) and the Short Form-12 (r = .4), and Tegner correlated with the Short Form-12 (r = .2). Both scores had acceptable floor and ceiling effects and all hypotheses were significant. The Lysholm and Tegner were responsive to change at each of the time points. After 25 years of changes in treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, the Lysholm knee score and the Tegner activity scale demonstrated acceptable psychometric parameters as patient-administered scores and showed acceptable responsiveness to be used in early return to function after anterior cruciate ligament treatment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale.

              We have designed a scoring scale for knee ligament surgery follow-up emphasizing evaluation of symptoms of instability. Instability is defined as "giving way" during activity. Our scoring scale was compared to a slightly modified Larson scale in patients with anteromedial and/or anterolateral instability, posterolateral and straight posterior instability, chondromalacia patellae, and meniscus lesion. The two scales gave basically the same results in patients with meniscus rupture. In patients with unstable knees, the new scale gave a significantly lower total score. Thus, the new scale evaluates functional impairment due to clinical instability better than the modified Larson scale. The total score, with the new scoring scale, corresponded to the patients' own opinion of function and to the presence or absence of signs of instability.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                migliorini.md@gmail.com
                Journal
                Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
                Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
                Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0936-8051
                1434-3916
                14 December 2020
                14 December 2020
                2021
                : 141
                : 2
                : 283-292
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.1957.a, ISNI 0000 0001 0728 696X, Department of Orthopaedics, University Clinic Aachen, , RWTH Aachen University Clinic, ; Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
                [2 ]GRID grid.11780.3f, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0335, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, , University of Salerno, ; Via S. Allende, 84081 Baronissi, SA Italy
                [3 ]GRID grid.9757.c, ISNI 0000 0004 0415 6205, School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, , Keele University School of Medicine, ; Thornburrow Drive, Stoke on Trent, England
                [4 ]GRID grid.4868.2, ISNI 0000 0001 2171 1133, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, , Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Hospital, ; 275 Bancroft Road, London, E1 4DG England
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7220-1221
                Article
                3689
                10.1007/s00402-020-03689-9
                7886734
                33315122
                e93df2a4-7998-48fb-895f-47f15a104d9e
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 21 December 2019
                : 11 November 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: RWTH Aachen (3131)
                Categories
                Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021

                Orthopedics
                patellofermoral instability,dislocations,mpfl reconstruction,lateral retinacular release

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content1,194

                Cited by19

                Most referenced authors1,193