177
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic RAC1 mutations in melanoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We characterized the mutational landscape of melanoma, the form of skin cancer with the highest mortality rate, by sequencing the exomes of 147 melanomas. Sun-exposed melanomas had markedly more ultraviolet (UV)-like C>T somatic mutations compared to sun-shielded acral, mucosal and uveal melanomas. Among the newly identified cancer genes was PPP6C, encoding a serine/threonine phosphatase, which harbored mutations that clustered in the active site in 12% of sun-exposed melanomas, exclusively in tumors with mutations in BRAF or NRAS. Notably, we identified a recurrent UV-signature, an activating mutation in RAC1 in 9.2% of sun-exposed melanomas. This activating mutation, the third most frequent in our cohort of sun-exposed melanoma after those of BRAF and NRAS, changes Pro29 to serine (RAC1 P29S) in the highly conserved switch I domain. Crystal structures, and biochemical and functional studies of RAC1 P29S showed that the alteration releases the conformational restraint conferred by the conserved proline, causes an increased binding of the protein to downstream effectors, and promotes melanocyte proliferation and migration. These findings raise the possibility that pharmacological inhibition of downstream effectors of RAC1 signaling could be of therapeutic benefit.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Coordination of Rho GTPase activities during cell protrusion

          The GTPases Rac1, RhoA and Cdc42 act in concert to control cytoskeleton dynamics1-3. Recent biosensor studies have shown that all three GTPases are activated at the front of migrating cells4-7 and biochemical evidence suggests that they may regulate one another: Cdc42 can activate Rac18, and Rac1 and RhoA are mutually inhibitory9-12. However, their spatiotemporal coordination, at the seconds and single micron dimensions typical of individual protrusion events, remains unknown. Here, we examine GTPase coordination both through simultaneous visualization of two GTPase biosensors and using a “computational multiplexing” approach capable of defining the relationships between multiple protein activities visualized in separate experiments. We found that RhoA is activated at the cell edge synchronous with edge advancement, whereas Cdc42 and Rac1 are activated 2 μm behind the edge with a delay of 40 sec. This indicates that Rac1 and RhoA operate antagonistically through spatial separation and precise timing, and that RhoA plays a role in the initial events of protrusion, while Rac1 and Cdc42 activate pathways implicated in reinforcement and stabilization of newly expanded protrusions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The small GTP-binding protein rac regulates growth factor-induced membrane ruffling.

            The function of rac, a ras-related GTP-binding protein, was investigated in fibroblasts by microinjection. In confluent serum-starved Swiss 3T3 cells, rac1 rapidly stimulated actin filament accumulation at the plasma membrane, forming membrane ruffles. Several growth factors and activated H-ras also induced membrane ruffling, and this response was prevented by a dominant inhibitory mutant rac protein, N17rac1. This suggests that endogenous rac proteins are required for growth factor-induced membrane ruffling. In addition to membrane ruffling, a later response to both rac1 microinjection and some growth factors was the formation of actin stress fibers, a process requiring endogenous rho proteins. Using N17rac1 we have shown that these growth factors act through rac to stimulate this rho-dependent response. We propose that rac and rho are essential components of signal transduction pathways linking growth factors to the organization of polymerized actin.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Melanoma genome sequencing reveals frequent PREX2 mutations

              Melanoma is notable for its metastatic propensity, lethality in the advanced setting, and association with ultraviolet (UV) exposure early in life 1 . To obtain a comprehensive genomic view of melanoma, we sequenced the genomes of 25 metastatic melanomas and matched germline DNA. A wide range of point mutation rates was observed: lowest in melanomas whose primaries arose on non-UV exposed hairless skin of the extremities (3 and 14 per Mb genome), intermediate in those originating from hair-bearing skin of the trunk (range = 5 to 55 per Mb), and highest in a patient with a documented history of chronic sun exposure (111 per Mb). Analysis of whole-genome sequence data identified PREX2 - a PTEN-interacting protein and negative regulator of PTEN in breast cancer 2 - as a significantly mutated gene with a mutation frequency of approximately 14% in an independent extension cohort of 107 human melanomas. PREX2 mutations are biologically relevant, as ectopic expression of mutant PREX2 accelerated tumor formation of immortalized human melanocytes in vivo. Thus, whole-genome sequencing of human melanoma tumors revealed genomic evidence of UV pathogenesis and discovered a new recurrently mutated gene in melanoma.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                9216904
                2419
                Nat Genet
                Nat. Genet.
                Nature genetics
                1061-4036
                1546-1718
                9 July 2012
                29 July 2012
                September 2012
                01 March 2013
                : 44
                : 9
                : 1006-1014
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
                [2 ]Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
                [3 ]W.M. Keck Foundation Biotechnology Resource Laboratory, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
                [4 ]Department of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
                [5 ]Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
                [6 ]Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
                [7 ]Department of Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
                [8 ]Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
                [9 ]Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
                [10 ]Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
                [11 ]Comprehensive Cancer Center, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
                [12 ]Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
                [13 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
                [14 ]Department of Medicine, Division of Dermatology, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
                [15 ]Center for Human Genetics and Genomics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
                [16 ]Program on Neurogenetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
                [17 ]School of Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence should be addressed to R.H. ( ruth.halaban@ 123456yale.edu )
                Article
                NIHMS390374
                10.1038/ng.2359
                3432702
                22842228
                e9496357-e962-4c7a-91c0-5512cc52d75e
                © 2012 Nature America,Inc. All rights reserved.

                Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: National Cancer Institute : NCI
                Award ID: P50 CA121974 || CA
                Categories
                Article

                Genetics
                Genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article