235
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Comparison of the Functional Traits of Common Reed ( Phragmites australis) in Northern China: Aquatic vs. Terrestrial Ecotypes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Common reed ( Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud.) is distributed widely throughout the world with various ecotypes. This research compares the functional traits and biomass allocation patterns of two contrasting reed ecotypes. Twelve pairs of aquatic and terrestrial reed samples were collected in northern China. Significant differences in functional traits between the two reed ecotypes were observed, while biomass allocation patterns of reed organs did not differ significantly except for at the root. The dry matter content (DMC) in the whole of the reed plant, leaf, root, and rhizome was higher; while the specific leaf area (SLA) and specific root length (SRL) were lower in terrestrial versus aquatic reed. The biomass allocation in organs of the two forms of reed was isometric, only root in the terrestrial habitat increased faster with an increase in the whole plant biomass. It can be affirmed that aquatic and terrestrial reed that adapt to different environments generally has distinct leaf and root functional traits but isometric biomass allocation patterns. This suggests different resource acquisition strategies: (1) aquatic reed grows faster with high SLA and SRL and is more responsive to the environment, while (2) terrestrial reed with high DMC grows slower and is less responsive to the adverse environment (e.g. dry soil conditions).

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history.

          A single genotype can produce different phenotypes in different environments. This fundamental property of organisms is known as phenotypic plasticity. Recently, intensive study has shown that plants are plastic for a remarkable array of ecologically important traits, ranging from diverse aspects of morphology and physiology to anatomy, developmental and reproductive timing, breeding system, and offspring developmental patterns. Comparative, quantitative genetics and molecular approaches are leading to new insights into the adaptive nature of plasticity, its underlying mechanisms and its role in the ecological distribution and evolutionary diversification of plants.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants.

            A general allometric model has been derived to predict intraspecific and interspecific scaling relationships among seed plant leaf, stem, and root biomass. Analysis of a large compendium of standing organ biomass sampled across a broad sampling of taxa inhabiting diverse ecological habitats supports the relations predicted by the model and defines the boundary conditions for above- and below-ground biomass partitioning. These canonical biomass relations are insensitive to phyletic affiliation (conifers versus angiosperms) and variation in averaged local environmental conditions. The model thus identifies and defines the limits that have guided the diversification of seed plant biomass allocation strategies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Decoupled leaf and stem economics in rain forest trees.

              Cross-species analyses of plant functional traits have shed light on factors contributing to differences in performance and distribution, but to date most studies have focused on either leaves or stems. We extend these tissue-specific analyses of functional strategy towards a whole-plant approach by integrating data on functional traits for 13 448 leaves and wood tissues from 4672 trees representing 668 species of Neotropical trees. Strong correlations amongst traits previously defined as the leaf economics spectrum reflect a tradeoff between investments in productive leaves with rapid turnover vs. costly physical leaf structure with a long revenue stream. A second axis of variation, the 'stem economics spectrum', defines a similar tradeoff at the stem level: dense wood vs. high wood water content and thick bark. Most importantly, these two axes are orthogonal, suggesting that tradeoffs operate independently at the leaf and at the stem levels. By simplifying the multivariate ecological strategies of tropical trees into positions along these two spectra, our results provide a basis to improve global vegetation models predicting responses of tropical forests to global change. © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                19 February 2014
                : 9
                : 2
                : e89063
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Resources Utilization of Chinese Herbal Medicine (Peking Union Medical College), Ministry of Education, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
                [2 ]Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy
                [3 ]Key Laboratory of Plant-Soil Interactions, Ministry of Education, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
                [4 ]Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
                [5 ]College of Horticulture and Forestry, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
                [6 ]Department of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing, China
                [7 ]State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Regional Eco-Process and Function Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, China
                University of Vigo, Spain
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: LL SZ WH NT. Performed the experiments: LL WH XJ CJ DJ PH. Analyzed the data: LL AOS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SZ NT WH XJ CJ DJ. Wrote the paper: LL WH SZ NT AOS XJ CJ DJ PH GTC.

                Article
                PONE-D-13-33286
                10.1371/journal.pone.0089063
                3929632
                e951ed30-3646-496f-bd71-ef06c452b529
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 13 August 2013
                : 15 January 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 7
                Funding
                This study was funded by the Kurt Eberhard Bode Foundation, Germany (within the Stifterverband für die Deutsche Wissenschaft) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41173083). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Developmental biology
                Plant growth and development
                Ecology
                Ecological environments
                Aquatic environments
                Terrestrial environments
                Ecological metrics
                Biomass (ecology)
                Plant ecology
                Plant-environment interactions
                Plant science
                Plant ecology
                Plant-environment interactions
                Plant growth and development

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article