2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Use of factor analysis to model relationships between bone mass and physical, dietary, and metabolic factors in frail and pre-frail older adults.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Bone mass and quality decline with age, and can culminate in osteoporosis and increased fracture risk. This investigation modeled associations between bone and physical, dietary, and metabolic factors in a group of 200 pre-frail/frail older adults using factor analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM). Exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted to compose factors and to assess their robustness. SEM was used to quantify associations between bone and the other factors. Factors arising from EFA and CFA were: bone (whole body, lumbar and femur bone mineral density, and trabecular bone score; good fit), body composition - lean (lean mass, body mass, vastus lateralis, and femoral cross-sectional area; good fit), body composition - fat (total fat mass, gynoid, android, and visceral fat; acceptable fit), strength (bench and leg press, handgrip, and knee extension peak torque; good fit), dietary intake (kilocalories, carbohydrate, protein, and fat; acceptable fit), and metabolic status (cortisol, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), growth hormone (GH), and free testosterone; poor fit). SEM using isolated factors showed that body composition (lean) (β = 0.66, P < 0.001), body composition (fat) (β = 0.36, P < 0.001), and strength (β = 0.74, P < 0.001) positively associated with bone. Dietary intake relative to body mass negatively associated with bone (β = -0.28, P = 0.001), whereas in absolute terms, it showed no association (β = 0.01, P = 0.911). In a multivariable model, only strength (β = 0.38, P = 0.023) and body composition (lean) (β = 0.34, P = 0.045) associated with bone. Resistance training programs that focus on improving lean mass and strength in older individuals may benefit bone in this population.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We used factor analysis and structural equation modeling, which are rarely used in nutrition or exercise science, but constitute powerful tools that may overcome limitations of traditional analyses, combining individual related variables into factors or constructs of interest. Our investigation represents a starting point on this progressive pathway, providing useful insight and a working model for researchers and practitioners who wish to tackle complex problems such as the multifactorial causes of bone loss in older adults.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Appl Physiol (1985)
          Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)
          American Physiological Society
          1522-1601
          0161-7567
          Jul 01 2023
          : 135
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Applied Physiology & Nutrition Research Group, School of Physical Education and Sport, Rheumatology Division, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
          [2 ] School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
          [3 ] Institute of Sport, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
          [4 ] Food Research Centre, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
          Article
          10.1152/japplphysiol.00129.2023
          37227185
          e9840613-dc18-4f39-aa86-8fcb70d88f19
          History

          bone-health,confirmatory factor analysis,lifestyle,structural equation modeling,exploratory factor analysis

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          Related Documents Log