3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Positional deprivation and support for radical right and radical left parties*

      1 , 1 , 1 , 1
      Economic Policy
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Satisfaction and comparison income

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A model of egoistical relative deprivation.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Relative deprivation: a theoretical and meta-analytic review.

              Relative deprivation (RD) is the judgment that one is worse off compared to some standard accompanied by feelings of anger and resentment. Social scientists use RD to predict a wide range of significant outcome variables: collective action, individual achievement and deviance, intergroup attitudes, and physical and mental health. But the results are often weak and inconsistent. The authors draw on a theoretical and meta-analytic review (210 studies composing 293 independent samples, 421 tests, and 186,073 respondents) to present a model that integrates group and individual RD. RD measures that (a) include justice-related affect, (b) match the outcome level of analysis, and (c) use higher quality measures yield significantly stronger relationships. Future research should focus on appropriate RD measurement, angry resentment, and the inclusion of theoretically relevant situational appraisals. Such methodological improvements would revitalize RD as a useful social psychological predictor of a wide range of important individual and social processes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Economic Policy
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0266-4658
                1468-0327
                January 2019
                January 01 2019
                December 24 2018
                January 2019
                January 01 2019
                December 24 2018
                : 34
                : 97
                : 49-93
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam; Centre of Development Studies, University of Cambridge; Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam; Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam
                Article
                10.1093/epolic/eiy017
                e994d635-eb03-4b76-a81c-2345c2f448f0
                © 2018

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article