9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Knowledge of journal impact factors among nursing faculty: a cross-sectional study

      research-article
      , MA, MLIS, , MLIS, BscN
      Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
      Medical Library Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The research assessed nursing faculty awareness and knowledge of the journal impact factor (JIF) and its impact on their publication choices.

          Methods

          A qualitative cross-sectional questionnaire was developed using Fluid Survey and distributed electronically to nursing faculty and instructors at three post-secondary institutions in Saskatchewan. Data were collected on place and status of employment, knowledge and awareness of JIFs, and criteria used to choose journals for publication.

          Results

          A total of forty-four nursing faculty and instructors completed the questionnaire. The authors found that faculty lack awareness or complete understanding of JIFs and that JIFs are not the most important or only criterion used when they choose a journal for publication.

          Conclusions

          There are various reasons for choosing a journal for publication. It is important for librarians to understand faculty views of JIFs and their criteria for choosing journals for publication, so that librarians are better equipped to guide researchers in considering their academic goals, needs, and personal values.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Impact factors: uses and abuses.

          Quantitative assessment of the scientific merit of journals and articles is being used increasingly to assess and compare researchers and institutions. The most commonly used measure is the 2 year Impact Factor, which broadly reflects the number of times each article in the journal has been cited over the previous 2 years. There are clear limitations to the use of such measures - not least, Impact Factors reflect the journal not the article, vary with time and correlate only poorly with perceived excellence. Simple comparison of impact factors in different specialties may be misleading. Review journals often have higher Impact Factors than those with original data. Both authors and editors can try to manipulate journal Impact Factors. However, despite valid concerns, Impact Factors are widely used and offer, at present, the best simple tool for comparison of output. Like all measures, the use of Impact Factors has to be tempered with knowledge of their limitations and common sense used in interpreting any data based on any analysis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Journal impact factors: implications for the nursing profession.

            The journal impact factor (IF) has become widely used as an absolute measure of the quality of professional journals. It is also increasingly used as a tool for measuring the academic performance of researchers and to inform decisions concerning the appointment and tenure of academic staff as well as the viability of their departments/schools. In keeping with these IF-related trends, nurse researchers and faculty the world over are being increasingly expected to publish only in journals that have a high IF and to abandon all other forms of publishing (including books and book chapters) that do not attract IF rankings. The IF obsession is placing in jeopardy the sustainability and hence viability of nursing journals and academic nursing publication lists (academic texts). If nurse authors abandon their publishing agenda and publish only in 'elite' journals (many of which may be outside nursing), the capacity of the nursing profession to develop and control the cutting edge of its disciplinary knowledge could be placed at risk. Other means for assessing the quality and impact of nursing journals need to be devised. In addition, other works (such as books and book chapters) need also to be included in quality metrics. Nurse authors and journal editors must work together and devise ways to ensure the sustainability and viability of nursing publications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The number that's devouring science

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Med Libr Assoc
                J Med Libr Assoc
                mlab
                Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
                Medical Library Association (65 East Wacker Place, Suite 1900, Chicago, IL 60601-7246 )
                1536-5050
                1558-9439
                April 2017
                : 105
                : 2
                : 140-144
                Article
                jmla-105-140
                10.5195/jmla.2017.207
                5370604
                e9a066d6-cce8-45ec-bb57-1861c016b83e
                Copyright: © 2017, Authors.

                Articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 01 August 2016
                : 01 November 2016
                Categories
                Research Communication

                Comments

                Comment on this article