Blog
About

0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Bayesian Implementation of the Multispecies Coalescent Model with Introgression for Phylogenomic Analysis

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Recent analyses suggest that cross-species gene flow or introgression is common in nature, especially during species divergences. Genomic sequence data can be used to infer introgression events and to estimate the timing and intensity of introgression, providing an important means to advance our understanding of the role of gene flow in speciation. Here, we implement the multispecies-coalescent-with-introgression model, an extension of the multispecies-coalescent model to incorporate introgression, in our Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo program Bpp. The multispecies-coalescent-with-introgression model accommodates deep coalescence (or incomplete lineage sorting) and introgression and provides a natural framework for inference using genomic sequence data. Computer simulation confirms the good statistical properties of the method, although hundreds or thousands of loci are typically needed to estimate introgression probabilities reliably. Reanalysis of data sets from the purple cone spruce confirms the hypothesis of homoploid hybrid speciation. We estimated the introgression probability using the genomic sequence data from six mosquito species in the Anopheles gambiae species complex, which varies considerably across the genome, likely driven by differential selection against introgressed alleles.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome.

          Neandertals, the closest evolutionary relatives of present-day humans, lived in large parts of Europe and western Asia before disappearing 30,000 years ago. We present a draft sequence of the Neandertal genome composed of more than 4 billion nucleotides from three individuals. Comparisons of the Neandertal genome to the genomes of five present-day humans from different parts of the world identify a number of genomic regions that may have been affected by positive selection in ancestral modern humans, including genes involved in metabolism and in cognitive and skeletal development. We show that Neandertals shared more genetic variants with present-day humans in Eurasia than with present-day humans in sub-Saharan Africa, suggesting that gene flow from Neandertals into the ancestors of non-Africans occurred before the divergence of Eurasian groups from each other.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach.

             J Felsenstein (1980)
            The application of maximum likelihood techniques to the estimation of evolutionary trees from nucleic acid sequence data is discussed. A computationally feasible method for finding such maximum likelihood estimates is developed, and a computer program is available. This method has advantages over the traditional parsimony algorithms, which can give misleading results if rates of evolution differ in different lineages. It also allows the testing of hypotheses about the constancy of evolutionary rates by likelihood ratio tests, and gives rough indication of the error of ;the estimate of the tree.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods.

               Q. Z. Yang (1994)
              Two approximate methods are proposed for maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation, which allow variable rates of substitution across nucleotide sites. Three data sets with quite different characteristics were analyzed to examine empirically the performance of these methods. The first, called the "discrete gamma model," uses several categories of rates to approximate the gamma distribution, with equal probability for each category. The mean of each category is used to represent all the rates falling in the category. The performance of this method is found to be quite good, and four such categories appear to be sufficient to produce both an optimum, or near-optimum fit by the model to the data, and also an acceptable approximation to the continuous distribution. The second method, called "fixed-rates model", classifies sites into several classes according to their rates predicted assuming the star tree. Sites in different classes are then assumed to be evolving at these fixed rates when other tree topologies are evaluated. Analyses of the data sets suggest that this method can produce reasonable results, but it seems to share some properties of a least-squares pairwise comparison; for example, interior branch lengths in nonbest trees are often found to be zero. The computational requirements of the two methods are comparable to that of Felsenstein's (1981, J Mol Evol 17:368-376) model, which assumes a single rate for all the sites.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Associate Editor
                Journal
                Mol Biol Evol
                Mol. Biol. Evol
                molbev
                Molecular Biology and Evolution
                Oxford University Press
                0737-4038
                1537-1719
                April 2020
                06 December 2019
                06 December 2019
                : 37
                : 4
                : 1211-1223
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London , London, United Kingdom
                [2 ] Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California , Davis, Davis, CA
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: E-mail: z.yang@ 123456ucl.ac.uk .
                Article
                msz296
                10.1093/molbev/msz296
                7086182
                31825513
                © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                Page count
                Pages: 13
                Product
                Funding
                Funded by: Biotechnological and Biological Sciences Research Council;
                Award ID: BB/N000609/1
                Award ID: BB/P006493/1
                Funded by: BBSRC equipment grant;
                Award ID: BB/R01356X/1
                Categories
                Methods

                Comments

                Comment on this article