26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Publish your biodiversity research with us!

      Submit your article here.

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Syrphidae of Southern Illinois: Diversity, floral associations, and preliminary assessment of their efficacy as pollinators

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Syrphid flies ( Diptera : Syrphidae ) are a cosmopolitan group of flower-visiting insects, though their diversity and importance as pollinators is understudied and often unappreciated. Data on 1,477 Syrphid occurrences and floral associations from three years of pollinator collection (2017-2019) in the Southern Illinois region of Illinois, United States, are here compiled and analyzed. We collected 69 species in 36 genera off of the flowers of 157 plant species. While a richness of 69 species is greater than most other families of flower-visiting insects in our region, a species accumulation curve and regional species pool estimators suggest that at least 33 species are yet uncollected. In order to further the understanding of Syrphidae as pollinators in the Southern Illinois region, we produced a NMDS ordination of floral associations for the most common syrphid species. The NMDS did not sort syrphid species into discrete ecological guilds, and syrphid floral associations generally fit those predicted by traditional pollination syndromes. We also conducted a preliminary analysis of the pollen-carrying capacity of different syrphid taxa, which found several Eristalis species to carry pollen loads comparable to the European Honey Bee, Apis mellifera , and showed significant differences in the pollen-carrying capacity of various syrphid species. Notably, the extremely common genus Toxomerus and other small Syrphinae species carried very little pollen, while large and pilose Eristalinae species carried large pollen loads.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Non-bee insects are important contributors to global crop pollination

            Wild and managed bees are well documented as effective pollinators of global crops of economic importance. However, the contributions by pollinators other than bees have been little explored despite their potential to contribute to crop production and stability in the face of environmental change. Non-bee pollinators include flies, beetles, moths, butterflies, wasps, ants, birds, and bats, among others. Here we focus on non-bee insects and synthesize 39 field studies from five continents that directly measured the crop pollination services provided by non-bees, honey bees, and other bees to compare the relative contributions of these taxa. Non-bees performed 25-50% of the total number of flower visits. Although non-bees were less effective pollinators than bees per flower visit, they made more visits; thus these two factors compensated for each other, resulting in pollination services rendered by non-bees that were similar to those provided by bees. In the subset of studies that measured fruit set, fruit set increased with non-bee insect visits independently of bee visitation rates, indicating that non-bee insects provide a unique benefit that is not provided by bees. We also show that non-bee insects are not as reliant as bees on the presence of remnant natural or seminatural habitat in the surrounding landscape. These results strongly suggest that non-bee insect pollinators play a significant role in global crop production and respond differently than bees to landscape structure, probably making their crop pollination services more robust to changes in land use. Non-bee insects provide a valuable service and provide potential insurance against bee population declines.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Vegan: Community Ecology Package

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Biodivers Data J
                Biodivers Data J
                1
                urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:F9B2E808-C883-5F47-B276-6D62129E4FF4
                urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:245B00E9-BFE5-4B4F-B76E-15C30BA74C02
                Biodiversity Data Journal
                Pensoft Publishers
                1314-2836
                1314-2828
                2020
                29 October 2020
                : 8
                : e57331
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Southern Illinois University Carbondale, School of Biological Sciences, Carbondale, IL, United States of America Southern Illinois University Carbondale, School of Biological Sciences Carbondale, IL United States of America
                [2 ] Iowa State University, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Ames, IA, United States of America Iowa State University, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology Ames, IA United States of America
                [3 ] Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Ottawa, Canada Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes Ottawa Canada
                [4 ] Southern Illinois University Carbondale, College of Agricultural Sciences, Carbondale, IL, United States of America Southern Illinois University Carbondale, College of Agricultural Sciences Carbondale, IL United States of America
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Jacob L Chisausky ( jacob.chisausky@ 123456siu.edu ).

                Academic editor: Torsten Dikow

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7820-5079
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7919-2639
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2149-8800
                Article
                57331 13471
                10.3897/BDJ.8.e57331
                7644652
                33199967
                ea400a75-628d-476f-ba7c-9f91a7bc1b65

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC0 Public Domain Dedication.

                History
                : 07 August 2020
                : 23 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 11, Tables: 2, References: 45
                Funding
                Funding for this project was provided by Service First Authority (43 U.S.C. 1703, revised by Public Law 113-76), Cooperative Agreement Award F16AC01016, CFDA Program 15.650, in collaboration between US Department of the Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) - Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge, USDA Forest Service (USFS) – Shawnee National Forest, and Southern Illinois University Carbondale.
                Categories
                Research Article

                syrphidae,hover flies,flower flies,syrphid richness,southern illinois,pollinators,pollen load,species accumulation curve,toxomerus

                Comments

                Comment on this article