The effect of a dialysate exchange with both 1.5 and 4.25% glucose solutions on plasma levels of glucose, insulin, gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), and glucagon has been investigated in 5 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. Only in the case of the 4.25% solution did plasma glucose levels rise above 100 mg/dl. 4 of the 5 patients responded to this change with a marked insulin secretion. Employing the 1.5% solution, plasma glucose remained stable and only a slight insulin stimulation was observed in 2 patients. It is concluded that provided the 4.25% dialysates are used only occasionally, there will be no continuous stimulation of the pancreatic β-cells due to absorption of glucose from the dialysate alone during CAPD treatment. GIP levels are highly elevated in CAPD patients. A dialysate exchange with either a 1.5 or a 4.25% glucose solution had no effect on this gastrointestinal hormone. Hyperglucagonemia was also observed in this collective. An initial suppression of glucagon levels occurred in 4 of the patients after a 4.25% dialysate exchange. The 5th patient demonstrated an initial rise followed by a later decrease in glucagon, a response similar to that reported in adult onset diabetes after an oral glucose tolerance test.
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.