11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Author reply: Wei Gan JJ, Lia Gan JJ, Hsien Gan JJ, Lee KT. Lateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A safe and effective surgical approach. Indian J Urol 2018;34:45-50

      reply

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dear Editor, We thank the readers for their comments to our article.[1] We fully agree that the optimal access for pelvic/lower pole/upper ureteric stones (in fact, in a majority of large renal stones) is through an upper pole puncture, preferably using the safer subcostal approach. However, this approach can be difficult to achieve in prone/supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) due to inherent anatomical limitations. Often, a longer, more dangerous supracostal approach is needed when upper pole puncture is deemed necessary. From the comparative experiences with prone and lateral PCNL, we feel that the use of a “kidney break” (only possible in lateral position) is a major factor in reducing the need for supracostal access; the lateral flexion of the spine moves the 12th rib cranially widening the lumbodorsal space, allowing easier access to the upper pole subcostally. This is reflected in the much higher rate of successful subcostal access in our series. In fact, lateral PCNL also seemed to make lower pole access easier and better aligned with the renal axis by moving the pelvis caudally, especially in short, fat patients. We believe and like to emphasize that the lateral position confers numerous other advantages, especially a faster and more efficient stone clearance rate-fragments fall out/easily flushed from (sometimes difficult to access) calyces into pelvis by gravity. In the 4 cases abandoned in this series, three had very turbid urine, suspicious of pus during the initial puncture-these kidneys were drained, patients treated with adequate antibiotics before returning for definitive PCNL. In one patient, a large upper ureteric stone was too impacted with a somewhat “kinked/distorted” pelviureteric junction (PUJ), rendering the attempted PCNL difficult. Conversion to an open ureterolithotomy was a breeze as the patient was already in the standard position for an open ureteric/renal surgery! Kind Regards,

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Lateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A safe and effective surgical approach

          Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is traditionally performed with the patient in the prone position for large renal calculi. However, anesthetic limitations exist with the prone position. Similarly, the supine position is associated with poorer ergonomics due to the awkward downward position of the renal tract, a smaller window for percutaneous puncture, and a higher risk of anterior calyx puncture. This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of lateral-PCNL in managing large renal calculi without the disadvantages of prone and supine positions. Methods: Retrospectively, 347 lateral-PCNL cases performed from July 2001 to July 2015 were examined. the patient's thorax, abdomen, and pelvis were positioned over a bridge perpendicular to a “broken” table, creating an extended lumbodorsal space. The procedure was evaluated in terms of stone clearance at 3 months’ postprocedure, operative time, and complications. Results: Primary stone clearance was achieved in 82.7% of patients. The mean operating time was 97 min. The average time taken to establish the tract and mean radiation time were 4.5 min and 6.93 min, respectively. In total, 2.3% of patients required postoperative transfusion, and 13.5% of patients had postoperative fever. There was one case of hydrothorax, but no bowel perforation. Conclusions: Our lateral-PCNL technique allows for effective stone clearance due to good stone ergonomics and it should be considered as a safe alternative even in the most routine procedures.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Journal
            Indian J Urol
            Indian J Urol
            IJU
            Indian Journal of Urology : IJU : Journal of the Urological Society of India
            Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
            0970-1591
            1998-3824
            Apr-Jun 2018
            : 34
            : 2
            : 164
            Affiliations
            [1]University College London Medical School, Gower Street, Kings Cross, London, UK
            [1 ]Department of Surgery, Tameside General Hospital, Fountain St, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK
            [2 ]Puteri Specialist Hospital, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
            Author notes
            Article
            IJU-34-164
            10.4103/iju.IJU_80_18
            5894295
            ea58be2b-ddb6-4b6e-814d-169429edd592
            Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Urology

            This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

            History
            : 22 March 2018
            : 23 March 2018
            Categories
            Letters to Editor

            Urology
            Urology

            Comments

            Comment on this article