74
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      REPETITIVE MOTOR LEARNING INDUCES COORDINATED FORMATION OF CLUSTERED DENDRITIC SPINES IN VIVO

      research-article
      1 , 1 , 2 , 1 , *
      Nature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Many lines of evidence suggest that memory in the mammalian brain is stored with distinct spatiotemporal patterns 1, 2 . Despite recent progresses in identifying neuronal populations involved in memory coding 35 , the synapse-level mechanism is still poorly understood. Computational models and electrophysiological data have shown that functional clustering of synapses along dendritic branches leads to nonlinear summation of synaptic inputs and greatly expands the computing power of a neural network 610 . However, whether neighboring synapses are involved in encoding similar memory and how task-specific cortical networks develop during learning remain elusive. Using transcranial two-photon microscopy 11 , we followed apical dendrites of layer 5 (L5) pyramidal neurons in the motor cortex while mice practiced novel forelimb skills. Here we show that a third of new dendritic spines (postsynaptic structures of most excitatory synapses) formed during the acquisition phase of learning emerge in clusters, and the majority of such clusters are neighboring spine pairs. These clustered new spines are more likely to persist throughout prolonged learning sessions and even long after training stops, compared to non-clustered counterparts. Moreover, formation of new spine clusters requires repetition of the same motor task, and the emergence of succedent new spine(s) accompanies the strengthening of the first new spine in the cluster. We also show that under control conditions new spines appear to avoid existing stable spines, rather than being uniformly added along dendrites. However, succedent new spines in clusters overcome such a spatial constraint and form in close vicinity to neighboring stable spines. Our findings suggest that clustering of new synapses along dendrites is induced by repetitive activation of the cortical circuitry during learning, providing a structural basis for spatial coding of motor memory in the mammalian brain.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Locally dynamic synaptic learning rules in pyramidal neuron dendrites.

          Long-term potentiation (LTP) of synaptic transmission underlies aspects of learning and memory. LTP is input-specific at the level of individual synapses, but neural network models predict interactions between plasticity at nearby synapses. Here we show in mouse hippocampal pyramidal cells that LTP at individual synapses reduces the threshold for potentiation at neighbouring synapses. After input-specific LTP induction by two-photon glutamate uncaging or by synaptic stimulation, subthreshold stimuli, which by themselves were too weak to trigger LTP, caused robust LTP and spine enlargement at neighbouring spines. Furthermore, LTP induction broadened the presynaptic-postsynaptic spike interval for spike-timing-dependent LTP within a dendritic neighbourhood. The reduction in the threshold for LTP induction lasted approximately 10 min and spread over approximately 10 microm of dendrite. These local interactions between neighbouring synapses support clustered plasticity models of memory storage and could allow for the binding of behaviourally linked information on the same dendritic branch.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development of long-term dendritic spine stability in diverse regions of cerebral cortex.

            Synapse formation and elimination occur throughout life, but the magnitude of such changes at distinct developmental stages remains unclear. Using transgenic mice overexpressing yellow fluorescent protein and transcranial two-photon microscopy, we repeatedly imaged dendritic spines on the apical dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal neurons. In young adolescent mice (1-month-old), 13%-20% of spines were eliminated and 5%-8% formed over 2 weeks in barrel, motor, and frontal cortices, indicating a cortical-wide spine loss during this developmental period. As animals mature, there is also a substantial loss of dendritic filopodia involved in spinogenesis. In adult mice (4-6 months old), 3%-5% of spines were eliminated and formed over 2 weeks in various cortical regions. Over 18 months, only 26% of spines were eliminated and 19% formed in adult barrel cortex. Thus, after a concurrent loss of spines and spine precursors in diverse regions of young adolescent cortex, spines become stable and a majority of them can last throughout life.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Experience leaves a lasting structural trace in cortical circuits

              Sensory experiences exert a powerful influence on the function and future performance of neuronal circuits in the mammalian neocortex1-3. Restructuring of synaptic connections is believed to be one mechanism by which cortical circuits store information about the sensory world4,5. Excitatory synaptic structures, such as dendritic spines, are dynamic entities6-8 which remain sensitive to alteration of sensory input throughout life6,9. It remains unclear, however, whether structural changes at the level of dendritic spines can outlast the original experience and thereby provide a morphological basis for long-term information storage. Here we follow spine dynamics on apical dendrites of pyramidal neurons in functionally-defined regions of adult mouse visual cortex during plasticity of eye-specific responses induced by repeated closure of one eye (monocular deprivation, MD). The first MD episode doubled the rate of spine formation, thereby increasing spine density. This effect was specific to layer 5 cells located in binocular cortex where most neurons increase their responsiveness to the non-deprived eye3,10. Restoring binocular vision returned spine dynamics to baseline levels, but absolute spine density remained elevated and many MD-induced spines persisted during this period of functional recovery. Remarkably, spine addition did not increase again when the same eye was closed for the second time. This absence of structural plasticity stands out against the robust changes of eye specific responses which occur even faster upon repeated deprivation3. Thus, spines added during the first MD experience might provide a structural basis for subsequent functional shifts. These results provide a strong link between functional plasticity and specific synaptic rearrangements, revealing a mechanism of how prior experiences could be stored in cortical circuits.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                12 January 2012
                19 February 2012
                1 September 2012
                : 483
                : 7387
                : 92-95
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
                [2 ]Department of Biological Sciences and James H. Clark Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]To whom correspondence should be addressed. yizuo@ 123456ucsc.edu
                Article
                NIHMS349013
                10.1038/nature10844
                3292711
                22343892
                ea603c97-f0c6-42b2-883d-25861a703cdc

                Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article