18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      COVID-19: Reflections on trust, tradeoffs, and preparedness

      1 , 1
      Journal of Risk Research
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Special report: The simulations driving the world’s response to COVID-19

          David Adam (2020)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The effects of communicating uncertainty on public trust in facts and numbers

            Significance Does openly communicating uncertainty around facts and numbers necessarily undermine audiences’ trust in the facts, or the communicators? Despite concerns among scientists, experts, and journalists, this has not been studied extensively. In four experiments and one field experiment on the BBC News website, words and numerical ranges were used to communicate uncertainty in news article-like texts. The texts included contested topics such as climate change and immigration statistics. While people’s prior beliefs about topics influenced their trust in the facts, they did not influence how people responded to the uncertainty being communicated. Communicating uncertainty numerically only exerted a minor effect on trust. Knowing this should allow academics and science communicators to be more transparent about the limits of human knowledge.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Book: not found

              Transparency: The Key to Better Governance?

              ‘Transparency’ is widely canvassed as a key to better governance, increasing trust in public-office holders. But it is more often preached than practised, more often referred to than defined, and more often advocated than critically analysed. This book exposes this doctrine to critical scrutiny from a range of disciplinary perspectives, including political science, philosophy, and economics. It traces the history of transparency as a doctrine of good governance and social organization, and identifies its different forms; assesses the benefits and drawbacks of measures to enhance various forms of transparency; and examines how institutions respond to measures intended to increase transparency, and with what consequences. Transparency is shown not to be a new doctrine. It can come into conflict with other doctrines of good governance, and there are some important exceptions to Jeremy Bentham's famous dictum that ‘the more closely we are watched, the better we behave’. Instead of heralding a new culture of openness in government, measures to improve transparency tend to lead to tighter and more centralized management of information.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Journal of Risk Research
                Journal of Risk Research
                Informa UK Limited
                1366-9877
                1466-4461
                April 27 2020
                : 1-11
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Communication, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
                Article
                10.1080/13669877.2020.1758192
                eafa292a-6f88-4ed2-bc2d-b0a7506ca1e4
                © 2020
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article