187
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Heterochromatin-Driven Nuclear Softening Protects the Genome against Mechanical Stress-Induced Damage

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Tissue homeostasis requires maintenance of functional integrity under stress. A central source of stress is mechanical force that acts on cells, their nuclei, and chromatin, but how the genome is protected against mechanical stress is unclear. We show that mechanical stretch deforms the nucleus, which cells initially counteract via a calcium-dependent nuclear softening driven by loss of H3K9me3-marked heterochromatin. The resulting changes in chromatin rheology and architecture are required to insulate genetic material from mechanical force. Failure to mount this nuclear mechanoresponse results in DNA damage. Persistent, high-amplitude stretch induces supracellular alignment of tissue to redistribute mechanical energy before it reaches the nucleus. This tissue-scale mechanoadaptation functions through a separate pathway mediated by cell-cell contacts and allows cells/tissues to switch off nuclear mechanotransduction to restore initial chromatin state. Our work identifies an unconventional role of chromatin in altering its own mechanical state to maintain genome integrity in response to deformation.

          Graphical Abstract

          Highlights

          • Stretch triggers amplitude-dependent supracellular and nuclear mechanoresponses

          • H3K9me3 heterochromatin mediates nuclear stiffness and membrane tension

          • Nuclear deformation-triggered Ca 2+ alters chromatin rheology to prevent DNA damage

          • Supracellular alignment redistributes stress to restore chromatin state

          Abstract

          When tissues are stretched, cells respond via two distinct mechanosensory mechanisms to protect the genome from damage and maintain tissue homeostasis. First, rapid heterochromatin-mediated mechanosensing, independent of known cellular mechanosensors, drives calcium-dependent nuclear softening. If the mechanical stress persists, a second, tissue-level reorganization occurs, mediated by cell-cell contacts to redistribute mechanical energy to prevent force transmission to the nucleus.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          alpha-Catenin as a tension transducer that induces adherens junction development.

          Adherens junctions (AJs), which are organized by adhesion proteins and the underlying actin cytoskeleton, probably sense pulling forces from adjacent cells and modulate opposing forces to maintain tissue integrity, but the regulatory mechanism remains unknown at the molecular level. Although the possibility that alpha-catenin acts as a direct linker between the membrane and the actin cytoskeleton for AJ formation and function has been minimized, here we show that alpha-catenin recruits vinculin, another main actin-binding protein of AJs, through force-dependent changes in alpha-catenin conformation. We identified regions in the alpha-catenin molecule that are required for its force-dependent binding of vinculin by introducing mutant alpha-catenin into cells and using in vitro binding assays. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analysis for alpha-catenin mobility and the existence of an antibody recognizing alpha-catenin in a force-dependent manner further supported the notion that alpha-catenin is a tension transducer that translates mechanical stimuli into a chemical response, resulting in AJ development.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mechanical stretch triggers rapid epithelial cell division through Piezo1

            Despite acting as a barrier for the organs they encase, epithelial cells turnover at some of the fastest rates in the body. Yet, epithelial cell division must be tightly linked to cell death to preserve barrier function and prevent tumour formation. How do the number of dying cells match those dividing to maintain constant numbers? We previously found that when epithelial cells become too crowded, they activate the stretch-activated channel Piezo1 to trigger extrusion of cells that later die 1 . Conversely, what controls epithelial cell division to balance cell death at steady state? Here, we find that cell division occurs in regions of low cell density, where epithelial cells are stretched. By experimentally stretching epithelia, we find that mechanical stretch itself rapidly stimulates cell division through activation of the same Piezo1 channel. To do so, stretch triggers cells paused in early G2 to activate calcium-dependent ERK1/2 phosphorylation that activates cyclin B transcription necessary to drive cells into mitosis. Although both epithelial cell division and cell extrusion require Piezo1 at steady state, the type of mechanical force controls the outcome: stretch induces cell division whereas crowding induces extrusion. How Piezo1-dependent calcium transients activate two opposing processes may depend on where and how Piezo1 is activated since it accumulates in different subcellular sites with increasing cell density. In sparse epithelial regions where cells divide, Piezo1 localizes to the plasma membrane and cytoplasm whereas in dense regions where cells extrude, it forms large cytoplasmic aggregates. Because Piezo1 senses both mechanical crowding and stretch, it may act as a homeostatic sensor to control epithelial cell numbers, triggering extrusion/apoptosis in crowded regions and cell division in sparse regions.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Genome architecture: domain organization of interphase chromosomes.

              The architecture of interphase chromosomes is important for the regulation of gene expression and genome maintenance. Chromosomes are linearly segmented into hundreds of domains with different protein compositions. Furthermore, the spatial organization of chromosomes is nonrandom and is characterized by many local and long-range contacts among genes and other sequence elements. A variety of genome-wide mapping techniques have made it possible to chart these properties at high resolution. Combined with microscopy and computational modeling, the results begin to yield a more coherent picture that integrates linear and three-dimensional (3D) views of chromosome organization in relation to gene regulation and other nuclear functions. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Cell
                Cell
                Cell
                Cell Press
                0092-8674
                1097-4172
                14 May 2020
                14 May 2020
                : 181
                : 4
                : 800-817.e22
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Helsinki Institute of Life Science, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
                [2 ]Wihuri Research Institute, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
                [3 ]Stem Cells and Metabolism Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
                [4 ]Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing, 50931 Cologne, Germany
                [5 ]Cologne Excellence Cluster for Stress Responses in Ageing-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
                [6 ]Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
                [7 ]Electron Microscopy Unit, Institute of Biotechnology, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
                [8 ]Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS, UMR 144 and Institut Pierre-Gilles de Gennes, PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France
                [9 ]Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Biological Information Processing-2: Mechanobiology, 52428 Jülich, Germany
                [10 ]Department of Dermatology, Center for Molecular Medicine, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
                [11 ]Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author sara.wickstrom@ 123456helsinki.fi
                [12]

                These authors contributed equally

                [13]

                Lead Contact

                Article
                S0092-8674(20)30345-7
                10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.052
                7237863
                32302590
                eb48f741-0421-4b10-b0a0-63d8c4d66995
                © 2020 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 12 August 2019
                : 2 January 2020
                : 20 March 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Cell biology
                stem cells,mechanotransduction,chromatin,heterochromatin,mechanoprotection,dna damage,nuclear lamina,nuclear architecture,nuclear mechanics

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log