28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) is an initiative of an international multidisciplinary team of researchers who aim to improve the selection of outcome measurement instruments both in research and in clinical practice by developing tools for selecting the most appropriate available instrument.

          Method:

          In this paper these tools are described, i.e. the COSMIN taxonomy and definition of measurement properties; the COSMIN checklist to evaluate the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties; a search filter for finding studies on measurement properties; a protocol for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; a database of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; and a guideline for selecting outcome measurement instruments for Core Outcome Sets in clinical trials. Currently, we are updating the COSMIN checklist, particularly the standards for content validity studies. Also new standards for studies using Item Response Theory methods will be developed. Additionally, in the future we want to develop standards for studies on the quality of non-patient reported outcome measures, such as clinician-reported outcomes and performance-based outcomes.

          Conclusions:

          In summary, we plea for more standardization in the use of outcome measurement instruments, for conducting high quality systematic reviews on measurement instruments in which the best available outcome measurement instrument is recommended, and for stopping the use of poor outcome measurement instruments.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Rasch Models for Measurement

           David Andrich (1988)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems

             FM LORD,  F. M. Lord,  FM Lord (1980)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Skindex, a quality-of-life measure for patients with skin disease: reliability, validity, and responsiveness.

              To measure the effects of skin disease on patients' quality of life, we developed a 61-item self-administered survey instrument called Skindex. Skindex has eight scales, each of which addresses a construct, or an abstract component, in a comprehensive conceptual framework: cognitive effects, social effects, depression, fear, embarrassment, anger, physical discomfort, and physical limitations. Item responses are standardized from 0 (no effect) to 100 (maximal effect); a scale score is the average of responses to items addressing a construct. In 201 patients seen by dermatologists, mean scale scores (+/-SD) ranged from 14 (+/-17) for physical limitations to 31 (+/-22) for physical discomfort. Scale scores were reproducible after 72 h (r = 0.68-0.90) and were internally consistent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.76-0.86). Construct validity was assessed in two ways: (i) in a comparison of patients with inflammatory dermatoses and patients with isolated lesions, patients with inflammatory dermatoses had higher scale scores, and (ii) in an exploratory factor analysis, 78% of the common variance was explained by seven factors that correlated with the scale scores of Skindex. Most of the a priori scale scores changed in the expected direction in patients who reported that their skin conditions had improved or worsened after 6 mo. Finally, physicians' judgments of disease severity did not consistently correlate with Skindex scores. These preliminary data suggest that Skindex reliably and responsively measures the effects of skin disease on patients' quality of life and may supplement clinical judgments of disease severity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Braz J Phys Ther
                Braz J Phys Ther
                rbfis
                Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
                Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
                1413-3555
                1809-9246
                19 January 2016
                Mar-Apr 2016
                : 20
                : 2
                : 105-113
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                Author notes
                *Correspondence Lidwine B. Mokkink VU University Medical Center Institute for Health and Care Research Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and EMGO De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands e-mail: w.mokkink@ 123456vumc.nl
                Article
                S1413-35552016005000143
                10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143
                4900032
                26786084

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License

                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 32, Pages: 9
                Categories
                Review Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article