228
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Viral epitope profiling of COVID-19 patients reveals cross-reactivity and correlates of severity

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 4 , 1 , 2 , 5 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 9 , 6 , 7 , 6 , 7 , 10 , 11 , 5 , 12 , 7 , 13 , 7 , 14 , 15 , 8 , MGH COVID-19 Collection & Processing Team 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 18 , 7 , 14 , 16 , 21 , 7 , 13 , 22 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 23 , 1 , 2 , 7 , §
      (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab)
      Science (New York, N.y.)
      American Association for the Advancement of Science

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Profiling coronaviruses

          Among the coronaviruses that infect humans, four cause mild common colds, whereas three others, including the currently circulating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), result in severe infections. Shrock et al. used a technology known as VirScan to probe the antibody repertoires of hundreds of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and pre–COVID-19 era controls. They identified hundreds of antibody targets, including several antibody epitopes shared by the mild and severe coronaviruses and many specific to SARS-CoV-2. A machine-learning model accurately classified patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and guided the design of an assay for rapid SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection. The study also looked at how the antibody response and viral exposure history differ in patients with diverging outcomes, which could inform the production of improved vaccine and antibody therapies.

          Science, this issue p. eabd4250

          Abstract

          Deep serological profiling reveals discriminatory epitopes that could be used for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection.

          Abstract

          INTRODUCTION

          A systematic characterization of the humoral response to severe acute respiratory system coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) epitopes has yet to be performed. This analysis is important for understanding the immunogenicity of the viral proteome and the basis for cross-reactivity with the common-cold coronaviruses.

          Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2, is notable for its variable course, with some individuals remaining asymptomatic whereas others experience fever, respiratory distress, or even death. A comprehensive investigation of the antibody response in individuals with severe versus mild COVID-19—as well as an examination of past viral exposure history—is needed.

          RATIONALE

          An understanding of humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 is critical for improving diagnostics and vaccines and gaining insight into variable clinical outcomes. To this end, we used VirScan, a high-throughput method to analyze epitopes of antiviral antibodies in human sera. We supplemented the original VirScan library with additional libraries of peptides spanning the proteomes of SARS-CoV-2 and all other human coronaviruses. These libraries enabled us to precisely map epitope locations and investigate cross-reactivity between SARS-CoV-2 and other coronavirus strains. The original VirScan library allowed us to simultaneously investigate antibody responses to prior infections and viral exposure history.

          RESULTS

          We screened sera from 232 COVID-19 patients and 190 pre–COVID-19 era controls against the original VirScan and supplemental coronavirus libraries, assaying more than 10 8 antibody repertoire–peptide interactions. We identified epitopes ranging from “private” (recognized by antibodies in only a small number of individuals) to “public” (recognized by antibodies in many individuals) and detected SARS-CoV-2–specific epitopes as well as those that cross-react with common-cold coronaviruses. Several of these cross-reacting antibodies are present in pre–COVID-19 era samples. We developed a machine learning model that predicted SARS-CoV-2 exposure history with 99% sensitivity and 98% specificity from VirScan data. We used the most discriminatory SARS-CoV-2 peptides to produce a Luminex-based serological assay, which performed similarly to gold-standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. We stratified the COVID-19 patient samples by disease severity and found that patients who had required hospitalization exhibited stronger and broader antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 but weaker overall responses to past infections compared with those who did not need hospitalization. Further, the hospitalized group had higher seroprevalence rates for cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex virus 1. These findings may be influenced by differences in demographic compositions between the two groups, but they raise hypotheses that may be tested in future studies. Using alanine scanning mutagenesis, we precisely mapped 823 distinct epitopes across the entire SARS-CoV-2 proteome, 10 of which are likely targets of neutralizing antibodies. One cross-reactive antibody epitope in S2 has been previously suggested to be neutralizing and, as it exists in pre–COVID-19 era samples, could affect the severity of COVID-19.

          CONCLUSION

          We present a highly detailed view of the epitope landscape within the SARS-CoV-2 proteome. This knowledge may be used to produce diagnostics with improved specificity and can provide a stepping stone to the isolation and functional dissection of both neutralizing antibodies and antibodies that might exacerbate patient outcomes through antibody-dependent enhancement or immune distraction.

          Our study reveals notable correlations between COVID-19 severity and both viral exposure history and overall strength of the antibody response to past infections. These findings are likely influenced by demographic covariates, but they generate hypotheses that may be tested with larger patient cohorts matched for age, gender, race, and other demographic variables.

          SARS-CoV-2 epitope mapping.

          VirScan detects antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients with severe and mild disease. Heatmap color represents the strength of the antibody response in each sample (columns) to each protein (rows, left) or peptide (rows, right). VirScan reveals the precise positions of epitopes, which can be mapped onto the structure of the spike protein (S). Examination of SARS-CoV-2 and seasonal coronavirus sequence conservation explains epitope cross-reactivity. A, Ala; D, Asp; E, Glu; F, Phe; I, Ile; K, Lys; L, Leu; N, Asn; P, Pro; Q, Gln; R, Arg; S, Ser; T, Thr; V, Val; W, Trp; Y, Tyr.

          Abstract

          Understanding humoral responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is critical for improving diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines. Deep serological profiling of 232 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and 190 pre–COVID-19 era controls using VirScan revealed more than 800 epitopes in the SARS-CoV-2 proteome, including 10 epitopes likely recognized by neutralizing antibodies. Preexisting antibodies in controls recognized SARS-CoV-2 ORF1, whereas only COVID-19 patient antibodies primarily recognized spike protein and nucleoprotein. A machine learning model trained on VirScan data predicted SARS-CoV-2 exposure history with 99% sensitivity and 98% specificity; a rapid Luminex-based diagnostic was developed from the most discriminatory SARS-CoV-2 peptides. Individuals with more severe COVID-19 exhibited stronger and broader SARS-CoV-2 responses, weaker antibody responses to prior infections, and higher incidence of cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex virus 1, possibly influenced by demographic covariates. Among hospitalized patients, males produce stronger SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses than females.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms.

          The Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (Mega) software implements many analytical methods and tools for phylogenomics and phylomedicine. Here, we report a transformation of Mega to enable cross-platform use on Microsoft Windows and Linux operating systems. Mega X does not require virtualization or emulation software and provides a uniform user experience across platforms. Mega X has additionally been upgraded to use multiple computing cores for many molecular evolutionary analyses. Mega X is available in two interfaces (graphical and command line) and can be downloaded from www.megasoftware.net free of charge.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin

            Since the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) 18 years ago, a large number of SARS-related coronaviruses (SARSr-CoVs) have been discovered in their natural reservoir host, bats 1–4 . Previous studies have shown that some bat SARSr-CoVs have the potential to infect humans 5–7 . Here we report the identification and characterization of a new coronavirus (2019-nCoV), which caused an epidemic of acute respiratory syndrome in humans in Wuhan, China. The epidemic, which started on 12 December 2019, had caused 2,794 laboratory-confirmed infections including 80 deaths by 26 January 2020. Full-length genome sequences were obtained from five patients at an early stage of the outbreak. The sequences are almost identical and share 79.6% sequence identity to SARS-CoV. Furthermore, we show that 2019-nCoV is 96% identical at the whole-genome level to a bat coronavirus. Pairwise protein sequence analysis of seven conserved non-structural proteins domains show that this virus belongs to the species of SARSr-CoV. In addition, 2019-nCoV virus isolated from the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of a critically ill patient could be neutralized by sera from several patients. Notably, we confirmed that 2019-nCoV uses the same cell entry receptor—angiotensin converting enzyme II (ACE2)—as SARS-CoV.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation

              Structure of the nCoV trimeric spike The World Health Organization has declared the outbreak of a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) to be a public health emergency of international concern. The virus binds to host cells through its trimeric spike glycoprotein, making this protein a key target for potential therapies and diagnostics. Wrapp et al. determined a 3.5-angstrom-resolution structure of the 2019-nCoV trimeric spike protein by cryo–electron microscopy. Using biophysical assays, the authors show that this protein binds at least 10 times more tightly than the corresponding spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)–CoV to their common host cell receptor. They also tested three antibodies known to bind to the SARS-CoV spike protein but did not detect binding to the 2019-nCoV spike protein. These studies provide valuable information to guide the development of medical counter-measures for 2019-nCoV. Science, this issue p. 1260

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Science
                Science
                SCIENCE
                science
                Science (New York, N.y.)
                American Association for the Advancement of Science
                0036-8075
                1095-9203
                27 November 2020
                29 September 2020
                : 370
                : 6520
                : eabd4250
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
                [2 ]Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Program in Virology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
                [3 ]Chemical Biology Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
                [4 ]Center for Systems Biology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
                [5 ]Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
                [6 ]Division of Allergy and Immunology and Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
                [7 ]Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness, Boston, MA, USA.
                [8 ]Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
                [9 ]Institute for Cell Engineering, Immunology Division, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
                [10 ]Division of Clinical Chemistry, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
                [11 ]Division of Immunology, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
                [12 ]Division of Intramural Research, NIAID, NIH, Baltimore, MD, USA.
                [13 ]Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
                [14 ]Infectious Disease Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
                [15 ]Endocrine Unit and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
                [16 ]Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
                [17 ]Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
                [18 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
                [19 ]Center for Bacterial Pathogenesis, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine and Microbiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
                [20 ]Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
                [21 ]Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
                [22 ]Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa, Congella, South Africa.
                [23 ]Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
                Author notes
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                [‡]

                MGH COVID-19 Collection & Processing Team participants and affiliations appear at the end of this paper.

                [§ ]Corresponding author. Email: selledge@ 123456genetics.med.harvard.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2484-4374
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8213-2143
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6458-9833
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7275-597X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7200-7867
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2512-9284
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0376-8560
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9405-1850
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7188-1330
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2625-6595
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8755-6105
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3708-3810
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0545-2079
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5209-9220
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1547-524X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9914-9662
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4740-3846
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7461-0408
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4266-9733
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2349-2656
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2588-7504
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8295-884X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6122-9245
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6690-944X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7923-6283
                Article
                abd4250
                10.1126/science.abd4250
                7857405
                32994364
                eb63e347-b2fc-42a5-b7aa-5a3de4eef36a
                Copyright © 2020, American Association for the Advancement of Science

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 22 June 2020
                : 25 September 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: AI139538
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000054, National Cancer Institute;
                Award ID: U24
                Funded by: MassCPR;
                Award ID: No Number
                Funded by: MassCPR;
                Award ID: No Number
                Funded by: MassCPR;
                Award ID: No Number
                Funded by: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000005, U.S. Department of Defense;
                Award ID: W81XWH-16-1-0464
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                R-Articles
                Immunology
                Microbio
                Online
                Custom metadata
                7
                7
                Valda Vinson
                Lauren Kmec
                1058

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log