20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      ‘Hard’ and ‘soft’ principles defining the structure, function and regulation of keratin intermediate filaments

      ,
      Current Opinion in Cell Biology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references79

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Viscoelastic properties of vimentin compared with other filamentous biopolymer networks

          The cytoplasm of vertebrate cells contains three distinct filamentous biopolymers, the microtubules, microfilaments, and intermediate filaments. The basic structural elements of these three filaments are linear polymers of the proteins tubulin, actin, and vimentin or another related intermediate filament protein, respectively. The viscoelastic properties of cytoplasmic filaments are likely to be relevant to their biologic function, because their extreme length and rodlike structure dominate the rheologic behavior of cytoplasm, and changes in their structure may cause gel-sol transitions observed when cells are activated or begin to move. This paper describes parallel measurements of the viscoelasticity of tubulin, actin, and vimentin polymers. The rheologic differences among the three types of cytoplasmic polymers suggest possible specialized roles for the different classes of filaments in vivo. Actin forms networks of highest rigidity that fluidize at high strains, consistent with a role in cell motility in which stable protrusions can deform rapidly in response to controlled filament rupture. Vimentin networks, which have not previously been studied by rheologic methods, exhibit some unusual viscoelastic properties not shared by actin or tubulin. They are less rigid (have lower shear moduli) at low strain but harden at high strains and resist breakage, suggesting they maintain cell integrity. The differences between F-actin and vimentin are optimal for the formation of a composite material with a range of properties that cannot be achieved by either polymer alone. Microtubules are unlikely to contribute significantly to interphase cell rheology alone, but may help stabilize the other networks.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Caspase Cleavage of Keratin 18 and Reorganization of Intermediate Filaments during Epithelial Cell Apoptosis

            Keratins 8 (K8) and 18 (K18) are major components of intermediate filaments (IFs) of simple epithelial cells and tumors derived from such cells. Structural cell changes during apoptosis are mediated by proteases of the caspase family. During apoptosis, K18 IFs reorganize into granular structures enriched for K18 phosphorylated on serine 53. K18, but not K8, generates a proteolytic fragment during drug- and UV light–induced apoptosis; this fragment comigrates with K18 cleaved in vitro by caspase-6, -3, and -7. K18 is cleaved by caspase-6 into NH2-terminal, 26-kD and COOH-terminal, 22-kD fragments; caspase-3 and -7 additionally cleave the 22-kD fragment into a 19-kD fragment. The cleavage site common for the three caspases was the sequence VEVD/A, located in the conserved L1-2 linker region of K18. The additional site for caspases-3 and -7 that is not cleaved efficiently by caspase-6 is located in the COOH-terminal tail domain of K18. Expression of K18 with alanine instead of serine at position 53 demonstrated that cleavage during apoptosis does not require phosphorylation of serine 53. However, K18 with a glutamate instead of aspartate at position 238 was resistant to proteolysis during apoptosis. Furthermore, this cleavage site mutant appears to cause keratin filament reorganization in stably transfected clones. The identification of the L1-2 caspase cleavage site, and the conservation of the same or very similar sites in multiple other intermediate filament proteins, suggests that the processing of IFs during apoptosis may be initiated by a similar caspase cleavage.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Immunocytochemical detection and mapping of a cytokeratin 18 neo-epitope exposed during early apoptosis.

              A neo-epitope in cytokeratin 18 (CK18) that becomes available at an early caspase cleavage event during apoptosis and is not detectable in vital epithelial cells is characterized. The monoclonal antibody M30, specific for this site, can be utilized specifically to recognize apoptotic cells, which show cytoplasmic cytokeratin filaments and aggregates after immunohistochemistry with M30, while viable and necrotic cells are negative. The number of cells recognized by the antibody increases after induction of apoptosis in exponentially growing epithelial cell lines and immunoreactivity is independent of the phosphorylation state of the cytokeratins. The generation of the M30 neo-epitope occurs early in the apoptotic cascade, before annexin V reactivity or positive DNA nick end labelling. In a flow cytometric assay, the majority of the M30-positive cells appear in the 'apoptotic' subG1 peak. Tests with synthetic peptides define positions 387-396 of CK18, with a liberated C-terminus at the caspase cleavage site DALD-S, as the ten-residue epitope of M30. This epitope starts at the end of coil 2 of the predicted CK18 structure, at a probable hinge region, compatible with the sensitivity to proteolytic cleavage. The definition of a specific caspase cleavage site in CK18 as a neo-epitope can be used for quantification of apoptotic epithelial cells with immunocytochemical techniques and is applicable to both fresh and formalin-fixed material. Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Current Opinion in Cell Biology
                Current Opinion in Cell Biology
                Elsevier BV
                09550674
                February 2002
                February 2002
                : 14
                : 1
                : 110-122
                Article
                10.1016/S0955-0674(01)00301-5
                11792552
                eb6ec0d3-1aca-422a-84d4-a7db4663c0b7
                © 2002

                http://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article