32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Treatment of Soft Tissue Filler Complications: Expert Consensus Recommendations

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Dermal fillers have been increasingly used in minimally invasive facial esthetic procedures. This widespread use has led to a rise in reports of associated complications. The aim of this expert consensus report is to describe potential adverse events associated with dermal fillers and to provide guidance on their treatment and avoidance.

          Methods

          A multidisciplinary group of experts in esthetic treatments convened to discuss the management of the complications associated with dermal fillers use. A search was performed for English, French, and Spanish language articles in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database, and Google Scholar using the search terms “complications” OR “soft filler complications” OR “injectable complications” AND “dermal fillers” AND “Therapy”. An initial document was drafted by the Coordinating Committee, and it was reviewed and modified by the experts, until a final text was agreed upon and validated.

          Results

          The panel addressed consensus recommendations about the classification of filler complications according to the time of onset and about the clinical management of different complications including bruising, swelling, edema, infections, lumps and bumps, skin discoloration, and biofilm formation. Special attention was paid to vascular compromise and retinal artery occlusion.

          Conclusions

          Clinicians should be fully aware of the signs and symptoms related to complications and be prepared to confidently treat them. Establishing action protocols for emergencies, with agents readily available in the office, would reduce the severity of adverse outcomes associated with injection of hyaluronic acid fillers in the cosmetic setting. This document seeks to lay down a set of recommendations and to identify key issues that may be useful for clinicians who are starting to use dermal fillers. Additionally, this document provides a better understanding about the diagnoses and management of complications if they do occur.

          Level of Evidence V

          This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Central retinal artery occlusion: visual outcome.

          To investigate systematically the natural history of visual outcome in central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO). Cohort study. At entry, 244 consecutive patients (260 eyes) with CRAO (seen consecutively from 1973 to 2000) had a detailed ocular and medical history and ocular evaluation. CRAO eyes were classified into four categories: non-arteritic (NA) CRAO (171 eyes), NA-CRAO with cilioretinal artery sparing (35), transient NA-CRAO (41), and arteritic CRAO (13). Within 7 days of onset of CRAO, initial visual acuity differed among the four CRAO types (P < .0001). In eyes with vision of counting fingers or worse, it improved in 82% of eyes with transient NA-CRAO, 67% of eyes with NA-CRAO with cilioretinal artery sparing, and 22% of eyes with NA-CRAO. Visual acuity improved primarily within the first 7 days (P < .0001). In the central 30-degree visual field, central scotoma was most common. Central visual field improved in 39% with transient NA-CRAO, 25% with NA-CRAO with cilioretinal artery sparing, and 21% with NA-CRAO. Peripheral visual field was normal in 62.9% of eyes with transient NA-CRAO and 22.1% in those with NA-CRAO. In 51.9% of eyes with NA-CRAO, the only remaining visual field was a peripheral island. Peripheral fields improved in NA-CRAO (39%) and in transient NA-CRAO (39%). Classification of CRAO is crucial for understanding differences in visual outcome. Marked improvement in visual acuity and visual field can occur without treatment and is determined by several factors. Visual field information is essential to evaluate visual disability in CRAO.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Avoiding and Treating Blindness From Fillers: A Review of the World Literature.

            As the popularity of soft tissue fillers increases, so do the reports of adverse events. The most serious complications are vascular in nature and include blindness.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Iatrogenic retinal artery occlusion caused by cosmetic facial filler injections.

              To investigate the clinical manifestations and visual prognosis of retinal artery occlusion resulting from cosmetic facial filler injections. Retrospective, noncomparative case series. Setting. Institutional. Study Population. Twelve consecutive patients with retinal artery occlusion caused by cosmetic facial filler injections. Main Outcome Measures. Filler materials, injection sites, best-corrected visual acuities, fundus fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography findings, and associated ocular and systemic manifestations. Seven, 2, and 3 patients had ophthalmic, central retinal, and branch retinal artery occlusions, respectively. Injected materials included autologous fat (7 cases), hyaluronic acid (4 cases), and collagen (1 case), and injection sites were the glabellar region (7 cases), nasolabial fold (4 cases), or both (1 case). Injected autologous fat was associated with worse final best-corrected visual acuity than the other materials. All patients with ophthalmic artery occlusion had ocular pain and no improvement in best-corrected visual acuity. Optical coherence tomography revealed thinner and less vascular choroids in eyes with ophthalmic artery occlusion than in adjacent normal eyes. Concomitant brain infarction developed in 2 cases each of central retinal artery occlusion and ophthalmic artery occlusion. Phthisis developed in 1 case of ophthalmic artery occlusion. Cosmetic filler injections into the glabellar region or nasolabial fold can cause retinal artery occlusion. Iatrogenic ophthalmic artery occlusion is associated with painful blindness, a thin choroid, brain infarction, and poor visual outcomes, particularly when autologous fat is used. Ophthalmic examination and systematic brain magnetic resonance imaging should be performed in patients with ocular pain after such injections. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                + 34 952 06 14 10 , furdiales@institutomedicomiramar.com
                Journal
                Aesthetic Plast Surg
                Aesthetic Plast Surg
                Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
                Springer US (New York )
                0364-216X
                1432-5241
                5 January 2018
                5 January 2018
                2018
                : 42
                : 2
                : 498-510
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Instituto Médico Miramar, Paseo de Miramar 21, 29016 Málaga, Spain
                [2 ]Centro de Medicina Estética Dra Escoda, Rambla de Catalunya 60, Barcelona, Spain
                [3 ]Clínica Milénio, R. Manuel da Silva Leal 11C, Lisbon, Portugal
                [4 ]Centro Médico Lajo-Plaza, Calle Moreto 10, Madrid, Spain
                [5 ]Clínica Mira + Cueto, Av. de Concha Espina 53, Madrid, Spain
                [6 ]Clínica Oftalmológica Antonio Moreno, Calle Esperanto, 19, 29007 Málaga, Spain
                [7 ]Teknobell Médicina Estética, Av. Pdte Carrero Blanco 14, Seville, Spain
                [8 ]Grupo de Dermatología Pedro Jaén, Calle Cinca 30, Madrid, Spain
                [9 ]Clínica de Medicina Estética Dra. Nazaret Romero, Paseo Castellana 123, Madrid, Spain
                [10 ]SClinic, Claudio Coello 92, Madrid, Spain
                [11 ]Hospital del Sureste Vía Verde, Ronda del Sur 10, Arganda del Rey, Madrid, Spain
                [12 ]Clínica de Medicina Estética Dra Villanueva, Carrer de Calvet 10, Barcelona, Spain
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1479-9733
                Article
                1063
                10.1007/s00266-017-1063-0
                5840246
                29305643
                eb73e2e6-50dc-4ea3-a07a-74fc59174962
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 25 September 2017
                : 17 December 2017
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2018

                Surgery
                esthetic procedures,dermal fillers,complications,treatment
                Surgery
                esthetic procedures, dermal fillers, complications, treatment

                Comments

                Comment on this article