Is levorphanol a better option than methadone?

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Methadone has been a stalwart pharmacologic option for the management of opioid drug dependence for many years. It substitutes for opioid agonists and possesses certain pharmacokinetic properties that confer characteristics preferable to those of other opioids for this application. Methadone is likewise used as an option for the treatment of pain, particularly chronic pain. It has a spectrum of pharmacodynamic activity, including contributions from non-opioid components, that translates to its specific clinical attributes as an analgesic. Unfortunately, basic science studies and accumulated clinical experience with methadone have revealed some undesirable, and even worrisome, features, including issues of safety. The benefit/risk ratio of methadone might be acceptable if there was no better alternative, but neither its pharmacokinetic nor pharmacodynamic properties are unique to methadone.

Related collections

Most cited references 38

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Oral opioid therapy for chronic peripheral and central neuropathic pain.

Michael C Rowbotham, Lisa Twilling, Pamela S Davies … (2003)

Although opioids are commonly used to treat chronic neuropathic pain, there are limited data to guide their use. Few controlled trials have been performed, and many types of neuropathic pain remain unstudied. Adults with neuropathic pain that was refractory to treatment were randomly assigned to receive either high-strength (0.75-mg) or low-strength (0.15-mg) capsules of the potent mu-opioid agonist levorphanol for eight weeks under double-blind conditions. Intake was titrated by the patient to a maximum of 21 capsules of either strength per day. Outcome measures included the intensity of pain as recorded in a diary, the degree of pain relief, quality of life, psychological and cognitive function, the number of capsules taken daily, and blood levorphanol levels. Among the 81 patients exposed to the study drug, high-strength levorphanol capsules reduced pain by 36 percent, as compared with a 21 percent reduction in pain in the low-strength group (P=0.02). On average, patients in the high-strength group took 11.9 capsules per day (8.9 mg per day) and patients in the low-strength group took close to the 21 allowed (18.3 capsules per day; 2.7 mg per day). Affective distress and interference with functioning were reduced, and sleep was improved, but there were no differences between the high-strength group and the low-strength group in terms of these variables. Noncompletion of the study was primarily due to side effects of the opioid. Patients with central pain after stroke were the least likely to report benefit. The reduction in the intensity of neuropathic pain was significantly greater during treatment with higher doses of opioids than with lower doses. Higher doses produced more side effects without significant additional benefit in terms of other outcome measures. Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society

0 comments Cited 65 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Methadone--metabolism, pharmacokinetics and interactions.

C. P. R. Coccia, Alfio Bertolini, Emilio Sternieri … (2004)

The pharmacokinetics of methadone varies greatly from person to person; so, after the administration of the same dose, considerably different concentrations are obtained in different subjects, and the pharmacological effect may be too small in some patients, too strong and prolonged in others. Methadone is mostly metabolised in the liver; the main step consists in the N-demethylation by CYP3A4 to EDDP (2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine), an inactive metabolite. The activity of CYP3A4 varies considerably among individuals, and such variability is the responsible for the large differences in methadone bioavailability. CYP2D6 and probably CYP1A2 are also involved in methadone metabolism. During maintenance treatment with methadone, treatment with other drugs may be necessary due to the frequent comorbidity of drug addicts: psychotropic drugs, antibiotics, anticonvulsants and antiretroviral drugs, which can cause pharmacokinetic interactions. In particular, antiretrovirals, which are CYP3A4 inducers, can decrease the levels of methadone, so causing withdrawal symptoms. Buprenorphine, too, is metabolised by CYP3A4, and may undergo the same interactions as methadone. Since it is impossible to foresee the time-lapse from the administration of another drug to the appearing of withdrawal symptoms, nor how much the daily dose of methadone should be increased in order to prevent them, patients taking combined drug treatments must be carefully monitored. The so far known pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions of methadone do not have life-threatening consequences for the patients, but they usually cause a decrease of the concentrations and of the effects of the drug, which in turn can cause symptoms of withdrawal and increase the risk of relapse into heroin abuse.

0 comments Cited 62 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

QTc interval screening in methadone treatment.

Mori J Krantz (2009)

An independent panel developed cardiac safety recommendations for physicians prescribing methadone. Expert panel members reviewed and discussed the following sources regarding methadone: pertinent English-language literature identified from MEDLINE and EMBASE searches (1966 to June 2008), national substance abuse guidelines from the United States and other countries, information from regulatory authorities, and physician awareness of adverse cardiac effects. RECOMMENDATION 1 (DISCLOSURE): Clinicians should inform patients of arrhythmia risk when they prescribe methadone. RECOMMENDATION 2 (CLINICAL HISTORY): Clinicians should ask patients about any history of structural heart disease, arrhythmia, and syncope. RECOMMENDATION 3 (SCREENING): Obtain a pretreatment electrocardiogram for all patients to measure the QTc interval and a follow-up electrocardiogram within 30 days and annually. Additional electrocardiography is recommended if the methadone dosage exceeds 100 mg/d or if patients have unexplained syncope or seizures. RECOMMENDATION 4 (RISK STRATIFICATION): If the QTc interval is greater than 450 ms but less than 500 ms, discuss the potential risks and benefits with patients and monitor them more frequently. If the QTc interval exceeds 500 ms, consider discontinuing or reducing the methadone dose; eliminating contributing factors, such as drugs that promote hypokalemia; or using an alternative therapy. RECOMMENDATION 5 (DRUG INTERACTIONS): Clinicians should be aware of interactions between methadone and other drugs that possess QT interval-prolonging properties or slow the elimination of methadone.