29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Continuity in general practice as predictor of mortality, acute hospitalisation, and use of out-of-hours care: a registry-based observational study in Norway

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Continuity, usually considered a quality aspect of primary care, is under pressure in Norway, and elsewhere.

          Aim

          To analyse the association between longitudinal continuity with a named regular general practitioner (RGP) and use of out-of-hours (OOH) services, acute hospital admission, and mortality.

          Design and setting

          Registry-based observational study in Norway covering 4 552 978 Norwegians listed with their RGPs.

          Method

          Duration of RGP–patient relationship was used as explanatory variable for the use of OOH services, acute hospital admission, and mortality in 2018. Several patient-related and RGP-related covariates were included in the analyses by individual linking to high-quality national registries. Duration of RGP–patient relationship was categorised as 1, 2–3, 4–5, 6–10, 11–15, or >15 years. Results are given as adjusted odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) resulting from multilevel logistic regression analyses.

          Results

          Compared with a 1-year RGP–patient relationship, the OR for use of OOH services decreased gradually from 0.87 (95% CI = 0.86 to 0.88) after 2–3 years’ duration to 0.70 (95% CI = 0.69 to 0.71) after >15 years. OR for acute hospital admission decreased gradually from 0.88 (95% CI = 0.86 to 0.90) after 2–3 years’ duration to 0.72 (95% CI = 0.70 to 0.73) after >15 years. OR for dying decreased gradually from 0.92 (95% CI = 0.86 to 0.98) after 2–3 years’ duration, to 0.75 (95% CI = 0.70 to 0.80) after an RGP–patient relationship of >15 years.

          Conclusion

          Length of RGP–patient relationship is significantly associated with lower use of OOH services, fewer acute hospital admissions, and lower mortality. The presence of a dose–response relationship between continuity and these outcomes indicates that the associations are causal.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Continuity of care with doctors—a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality

          Objective Continuity of care is a long-standing feature of healthcare, especially of general practice. It is associated with increased patient satisfaction, increased take-up of health promotion, greater adherence to medical advice and decreased use of hospital services. This review aims to examine whether there is a relationship between the receipt of continuity of doctor care and mortality. Design Systematic review without meta-analysis. Data sources MEDLINE, Embase and the Web of Science, from 1996 to 2017. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Peer-reviewed primary research articles, published in English which reported measured continuity of care received by patients from any kind of doctor, in any setting, in any country, related to measured mortality of those patients. Results Of the 726 articles identified in searches, 22 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The studies were all cohort or cross-sectional and most adjusted for multiple potential confounding factors. These studies came from nine countries with very different cultures and health systems. We found such heterogeneity of continuity and mortality measurement methods and time frames that it was not possible to combine the results of studies. However, 18 (81.8%) high-quality studies reported statistically significant reductions in mortality, with increased continuity of care. 16 of these were with all-cause mortality. Three others showed no association and one demonstrated mixed results. These significant protective effects occurred with both generalist and specialist doctors. Conclusions This first systematic review reveals that increased continuity of care by doctors is associated with lower mortality rates. Although all the evidence is observational, patients across cultural boundaries appear to benefit from continuity of care with both generalist and specialist doctors. Many of these articles called for continuity to be given a higher priority in healthcare planning. Despite substantial, successive, technical advances in medicine, interpersonal factors remain important. PROSPERO registration number CRD42016042091.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Keep Calm and Learn Multilevel Logistic Modeling: A Simplified Three-Step Procedure Using Stata, R, Mplus, and SPSS

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Identifying co-morbidity in surgical patients using administrative data with the Royal College of Surgeons Charlson Score.

              Surgical outcomes are influenced by co-morbidity. The Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) Co-morbidity Consensus Group was convened to improve existing instruments that identify co-morbidity in International Classification of Diseases tenth revision administrative data. The RCS Charlson Score was developed using a coding philosophy that enhances international transferability and avoids misclassifying complications as co-morbidity. The score was validated in English Hospital Episode Statistics data for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, aortic valve replacement, total hip replacement and transurethral prostate resection. With exception of AAA, patients with co-morbidity were older and more likely to be admitted as an emergency than those without. All patients with co-morbidity stayed longer in hospital, required more augmented care, and had higher in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates. Multivariable prognostic models incorporating the RCS Charlson Score had better discriminatory power than those that relied only on age, sex, admission method (elective or emergency) and number of emergency admissions in the preceding year. The RCS Charlson Score identifies co-morbidity in surgical patients in England at least as well as existing instruments. Given its explicit coding philosophy, it may be used as a co-morbidity scoring instrument for international comparisons. Copyright 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Senior researcher
                Role: Professor
                Role: Researcher
                Role: National Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care
                Journal
                Br J Gen Pract
                Br J Gen Pract
                bjgp
                bjgp
                The British Journal of General Practice
                Royal College of General Practitioners
                0960-1643
                1478-5242
                February 2022
                05 October 2021
                05 October 2021
                : 72
                : 715
                : e84-e90
                Affiliations
                National Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen.
                Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen.
                National Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen; Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen.
                NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen; Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen.
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence Hogne Sandvik, National Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Årstadveien 17, 5009 Bergen, Norway. Email: Hogne.Sandvik@ 123456uib.no
                Article
                10.3399/BJGP.2021.0340
                8510690
                34607797
                ebfe38eb-6997-47c1-a52b-08e9e1219876
                © The Authors

                This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 03 June 2021
                : 05 August 2021
                : 20 August 2021
                Categories
                Research

                continuity of patient care,emergency medical services,family practice,general practice,hospitalisation,mortality,norway

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log