48
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mixed Effect Modelling of Single Trial Variability in Ultra-High Field fMRI

      Preprint

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Neuronal brain activity in response to repeated stimuli can be perceived using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In this paper, we develop a statistical model for fMRI data that estimates both the associated haemodynamic response function and the within and between trial variability through maximum likelihood estimation. We discuss our results in the context of other model-driven approaches, extending models already popular in the literature, while removing the need for some of their assumptions. We consider an application to the motor cortex activity caused by a subject pressing a button and observe that the response changes significantly with task and through time.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power.

          This paper is about detecting activations in statistical parametric maps and considers the relative sensitivity of a nested hierarchy of tests that we have framed in terms of the level of inference (voxel level, cluster level, and set level). These tests are based on the probability of obtaining c, or more, clusters with k, or more, voxels, above a threshold u. This probability has a reasonably simple form and is derived using distributional approximations from the theory of Gaussian fields. The most important contribution of this work is the notion of set-level inference. Set-level inference refers to the statistical inference that the number of clusters comprising an observed activation profile is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance. This inference pertains to the set of activations reaching criteria and represents a new way of assigning P values to distributed effects. Cluster-level inferences are a special case of set-level inferences, which obtain when the number of clusters c = 1. Similarly voxel-level inferences are special cases of cluster-level inferences that result when the cluster can be very small (i.e., k = 0). Using a theoretical power analysis of distributed activations, we observed that set-level inferences are generally more powerful than cluster-level inferences and that cluster-level inferences are generally more powerful than voxel-level inferences. The price paid for this increased sensitivity is reduced localizing power: Voxel-level tests permit individual voxels to be identified as significant, whereas cluster-and set-level inferences only allow clusters or sets of clusters to be so identified. For all levels of inference the spatial size of the underlying signal f (relative to resolution) determines the most powerful thresholds to adopt. For set-level inferences if f is large (e.g., fMRI) then the optimum extent threshold should be greater than the expected number of voxels for each cluster. If f is small (e.g., PET) the extent threshold should be small. We envisage that set-level inferences will find a role in making statistical inferences about distributed activations, particularly in fMRI.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Analysis of functional MRI time-series

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A general statistical analysis for fMRI data.

              We propose a method for the statistical analysis of fMRI data that seeks a compromise between efficiency, generality, validity, simplicity, and execution speed. The main differences between this analysis and previous ones are: a simple bias reduction and regularization for voxel-wise autoregressive model parameters; the combination of effects and their estimated standard deviations across different runs/sessions/subjects via a hierarchical random effects analysis using the EM algorithm; overcoming the problem of a small number of runs/session/subjects using a regularized variance ratio to increase the degrees of freedom.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                1501.05763

                Applications
                Applications

                Comments

                Comment on this article