Blog
About

0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      The Prognostic Role of Atrial Natriuretic Peptides in Hemodialysis Patients

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: It is well known that plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) is an indicator of extracellular fluid volume expansion and that plasma ANP is considered to be a marker for setting the proper dry weight of HD patients. Although the plasma ANP is a prognostic predictor of cardiac death, the prognostic role of ANP in HD patients has yet to be elucidated. In this study, we investigated the prognostic role of ANP in HD patients. Methods: Plasma ANP concentrations were measured in 105 HD patients after HD. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the major factors causing increased plasma ANP concentrations. Cardiac mortality was monitored for 24 months after baseline analysis, and the prognostic role of ANP was examined by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: Multiple regression analysis showed that cardiovascular disease (CD) and age were independent factors for elevated ANP (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.298, p < 0.0001). During a 24-month follow-up period, cardiac death occurred in 11 patients. Kaplan- Meier survival estimates of patients from varying plasma ANP levels (<50 and >50 pg/ml) differed between the two groups (p < 0.0001). The group with the higher ANP level (>50 pg/ml) had the lower survival. When compared with patients with ANP <50, the hazard ratios for cardiac death of patients with ANP of >50 pg/ml were 32.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.1 to 252.4). Univariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that ANP, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), LVMI, age, serum albumin and C-reactive protein (CRP) were significantly associated with the risk of cardiac mortality. By stepwise multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, only ANP, LVMI and CRP remained powerful independent predictors of cardiac death. The relative risk ratios were 3.483 (95% CI 1.640–7.397) for ln ANP, 1.023 (1.008–1.038) for LVMI, and 1.379 (1.115–1.705) for CRP. Conclusion: High plasma ANP level of post-HD were strongly associated with CD and age. Post-HD ANP level may be a reliable parameter for assessing the risk for cardiac death in HD patients by providing prognostic information independent of other variables previously reported.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings.

          To determine the accuracy of echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) dimension and mass measurements for detection and quantification of LV hypertrophy, results of blindly read antemortem echocardiograms were compared with LV mass measurements made at necropsy in 55 patients. LV mass was calculated using M-mode LV measurements by Penn and American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) conventions and cube function and volume correction formulas in 52 patients. Penn-cube LV mass correlated closely with necropsy LV mass (r = 0.92, p less than 0.001) and overestimated it by only 6%; sensitivity in 18 patients with LV hypertrophy (necropsy LV mass more than 215 g) was 100% (18 of 18 patients) and specificity was 86% (29 of 34 patients). ASE-cube LV mass correlated similarly to necropsy LV mass (r = 0.90, p less than 0.001), but systematically overestimated it (by a mean of 25%); the overestimation could be corrected by the equation: LV mass = 0.80 (ASE-cube LV mass) + 0.6 g. Use of ASE measurements in the volume correction formula systematically underestimated necropsy LV mass (by a mean of 30%). In a subset of 9 patients, 3 of whom had technically inadequate M-mode echocardiograms, 2-dimensional echocardiographic (echo) LV mass by 2 methods was also significantly related to necropsy LV mass (r = 0.68, p less than 0.05 and r = 0.82, p less than 0.01). Among other indexes of LV anatomy, only measurement of myocardial cross-sectional area was acceptably accurate for quantitation of LV mass (r = 0.80, p less than 0.001) or diagnosis of LV hypertrophy (sensitivity = 72%, specificity = 94%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Diagnostic potential of cardiac natriuretic peptides in dialysis patients.

            In the general population, the plasma concentrations of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) are useful to predict left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and LV systolic dysfunction. Whether these cardiac hormones have a similar diagnostic potential in dialysis patients is unknown. We studied the diagnostic value of ANP and BNP for alterations in LV mass and function in a cohort of 246 dialysis patients without clinical evidence of heart failure. Both ANP and BNP were independently related to left ventricular mass (P < 0.0001) as well as to ejection fraction (P < 0.0001). In an analysis based on a prospectively defined threshold (95th percentile of the normal range), BNP had a significantly higher (P < 0.01) sensitivity (88%) than ANP (51%) for the diagnosis of LVH, but the positive predictive value of the two peptides was very similar (92 and 87%, respectively, P = NS). However, the negative predictive value of BNP for excluding LVH was 22% higher than that of ANP (53 vs. 31%, P = 0.05). Both natriuretic peptides had a high sensitivity for the detection of LV dysfunction (87 and 94%), but their positive predictive value was low (25 and 15%). Importantly, both ANP and BNP proved to be very useful for excluding this alteration (negative predictive value 97 and 96%, respectively). An analysis based on the "best cut-offs" of each peptide as identified on the basis of the ROC curves augmented the positive and negative prediction values of BNP for the diagnosis of LVH to 95 and 61%, respectively. This approach also raised the BNP-positive prediction value for the identification of LV dysfunction to 31% but did not modify the diagnostic potential of ANP (either for LVH or for LV dysfunction). Measuring the plasma concentration of cardiac natriuretic hormones, particularly BNP, may be useful for the identification of dialysis patients with LVH or for excluding systolic dysfunction.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Clinical Significance of Natriuretic Peptides and Cyclic GMP in Hemodialysis Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

              Background: Plasma concentrations of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) are suitable markers of ’dry body weight’ (DW) in hemodialysis (HD) patients. However, it is still unknown whether these markers can be applied to patients with renal failure and coronary artery disease (CAD). We examined the reliability of these peptides as volume markers in HD patients with CAD. We also assessed the relationship between natriuretic peptides and indices of left ventricular (LV) function. Methods: Plasma concentrations of ANP, BNP and cGMP were determined before and after HD in patients with CAD (group 1, n = 19, mean age 63 ± 12 years) and were compared with those of patients without cardiac disease (group 2, n = 20, age 61 ± 15 years). Using data obtained by cardiac catheterization, we examined the relationship between natriuretic peptides and indices of LV function in HD patients with CAD. Results: Baseline ANP (244 ± 205 pg/ml), BNP (713 ± 928 pg/ml) and cGMP (29.6 ± 21.6 pmol/ml) were significantly higher in group 1 than in 11 healthy volunteers (18.6 ± 9.9 pg/ml, 7.7 ± 7.6 pg/ml, cGMP 8.9 ± 4.9 pmol/ml, respectively). HD significantly reduced plasma ANP (87 ± 75 pg/ml) and BNP (477 ± 702 pg/ml) although they were still above normal control. HD reduced plasma cGMP (7.2 ± 4.5 pmol/ml) to normal values, suggesting the elimination of cGMP across the dialyzers. Baseline levels of ANP, BNP and cGMP in group 2 were less than those of group 1 but higher than the control. HD reduced natriuretic peptides in group 2 to levels lower than those in post-HD group 1. After HD, there was no significant correlation between reductions in body weight and changes in ANP or BNP. Baseline ANP and BNP levels closely correlated with pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary artery wedge pressure, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and left ventricular ejection fraction. A significant correlation was observed between BNP levels and the severity of CAD. Conclusion: ANP, BNP and cGMP seem to be a useful markers for fluid overload but not for DW in HD patients with CAD. Plasma ANP and BNP might be useful markers for left ventricular function.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BPU
                Blood Purif
                10.1159/issn.0253-5068
                Blood Purification
                S. Karger AG
                0253-5068
                1421-9735
                2003
                2003
                03 November 2003
                : 21
                : 6
                : 395-400
                Affiliations
                Department of Urology, Osaka City University Medical School, Osaka, Japan
                Article
                73442 Blood Purif 2003;21:395–400
                10.1159/000073442
                14586182
                © 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, References: 23, Pages: 6
                Product
                Self URI (application/pdf): https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/73442
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Comments

                Comment on this article