2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      More attention on glial cells to have better recovery after spinal cord injury

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Functional improvement after spinal cord injury remains an unsolved difficulty. Glial scars, a major component of SCI lesions, are very effective in improving the rate of this recovery. Such scars are a result of complex interaction mechanisms involving three major cells, namely, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and microglia. In recent years, scientists have identified two subtypes of reactive astrocytes, namely, A1 astrocytes that induce the rapid death of neurons and oligodendrocytes, and A2 astrocytes that promote neuronal survival. Moreover, recent studies have suggested that the macrophage polarization state is more of a continuum between M1 and M2 macrophages. M1 macrophages that encourage the inflammation process kill their surrounding cells and inhibit cellular proliferation. In contrast, M2 macrophages promote cell proliferation, tissue growth, and regeneration. Furthermore, the ability of oligodendrocyte precursor cells to differentiate into adult oligodendrocytes or even neurons has been reviewed. Here, we first scrutinize recent findings on glial cell subtypes and their beneficial or detrimental effects after spinal cord injury. Second, we discuss how we may be able to help the functional recovery process after injury.

          Highlights

          • Reactive astrocytes are divided into two subsets: A1 astrocytes and A2 astrocytes.

          • The transformation of A1 to A2 reactive astrocytes can be a beneficial strategy for better repair.

          • The NeuroD1 factor can be used to convert most astrocytes into the neurons or the A2 astrocytes.

          • Differentiation of oligodendrocytes to their progenitor cells after injury may be useful for better response.

          • Increase the ratio of M2/M1 macrophages at the injury site is a potential therapeutic solution.

          Related collections

          Most cited references138

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia

          A reactive astrocyte subtype termed A1 is induced after injury or disease of the central nervous system and subsequently promotes the death of neurons and oligodendrocytes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Fate mapping analysis reveals that adult microglia derive from primitive macrophages.

            Microglia are the resident macrophages of the central nervous system and are associated with the pathogenesis of many neurodegenerative and brain inflammatory diseases; however, the origin of adult microglia remains controversial. We show that postnatal hematopoietic progenitors do not significantly contribute to microglia homeostasis in the adult brain. In contrast to many macrophage populations, we show that microglia develop in mice that lack colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) but are absent in CSF-1 receptor-deficient mice. In vivo lineage tracing studies established that adult microglia derive from primitive myeloid progenitors that arise before embryonic day 8. These results identify microglia as an ontogenically distinct population in the mononuclear phagocyte system and have implications for the use of embryonically derived microglial progenitors for the treatment of various brain disorders.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment

              Macrophages are endowed with a variety of receptors for lineage-determining growth factors, T helper (Th) cell cytokines, and B cell, host, and microbial products. In tissues, macrophages mature and are activated in a dynamic response to combinations of these stimuli to acquire specialized functional phenotypes. As for the lymphocyte system, a dichotomy has been proposed for macrophage activation: classic vs. alternative, also M1 and M2, respectively. In view of recent research about macrophage functions and the increasing number of immune-relevant ligands, a revision of the model is needed. Here, we assess how cytokines and pathogen signals influence their functional phenotypes and the evidence for M1 and M2 functions and revisit a paradigm initially based on the role of a restricted set of selected ligands in the immune response.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Biochem Biophys Rep
                Biochem Biophys Rep
                Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
                Elsevier
                2405-5808
                25 January 2021
                March 2021
                25 January 2021
                : 25
                : 100905
                Affiliations
                [a ]Skull Base Research Center, Hazrat Rasoul Hospital, The Five Senses Health Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                [b ]Neuroscience Research Center (NRC), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                [c ]Department of Medical Basic Sciences, Faculty of Allied Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                [d ]ENT and Head & Neck Research Center and Department, The Five Senses Health Institute, Hazrat Rasoul Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                [e ]Department of Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
                [f ]Department of Food Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Skull Base Research Center, Hazrat Rasoul Hospital, The five Senses Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. hassanzadeh.sa@ 123456iums.ac.ir
                Article
                S2405-5808(20)30215-6 100905
                10.1016/j.bbrep.2020.100905
                7844125
                33553683
                ecac2b98-a258-4baa-a38b-38f4916fdff8
                © 2021 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 1 September 2020
                : 29 December 2020
                : 29 December 2020
                Categories
                Review Article

                spinal cord injury,a1 astrocyte,a2 astrocyte,opcs,m1 and m2 macrophages,cns, central nervous system,sci, spinal cord injury,opcs, oligodendrocytes progenitor cells

                Comments

                Comment on this article