72
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Rebleeding of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in the Immediate Postoperative Period after Coil Embolization

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Early rebleeding after coil embolization of ruptured intracranial aneurysms is rare, however serious and fatal results of rebleeding have been reported. We studied the incidence and angiographic and clinical characteristics of rebleeding of ruptured aneurysms occurring in the immediate postoperative period after coil embolization.

          Materials and Methods

          We analyzed patients who had aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and underwent coil embolization. Patients with dissecting aneurysms, blood blister-like aneurysms, fusiform aneurysms, and pseudoaneurysms were excluded. This study included 330 consecutive patients. The clinical and radiological data of 7 of these patients with acute rebleeding after coil embolization were reviewed.

          Results

          The incidence of rebleeding of ruptured aneurysms after coil embolization was 2.1% (7/330), and all cases of rebleeding occurred in the immediate postoperative period within 3 days after coiling. The radiological characteristics were as follows: anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysm (71.4%, 5/7); presence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH, 71.4%, 5/7); dome-to-neck ratio < 2 (42.9%, 3/7); presence of bleb (42.9%, 3/7); and subtotal occlusion of aneurysm after coiling (14.3%, 1/7). A thrombolytic agent was administered in 1 patient and continued anticoagulation was performed in 2 patients. Rebleeding patients showed a very poor outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale 1, 85.7%, 6/7).

          Conclusion

          The prognosis of early rebleeding was very poor. Location of aneurysms on ACoA, the unilateral hypoplasia of A1 segment, presence of ICH and bleb, and adverse events during the procedure were probably associated with early rebleeding of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the immediate postoperative period after coil embolization.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial.

          Endovascular detachable coil treatment is being increasingly used as an alternative to craniotomy and clipping for some ruptured intracranial aneurysms, although the relative benefits of these two approaches have yet to be established. We undertook a randomised, multicentre trial to compare the safety and efficacy of endovascular coiling with standard neurosurgical clipping for such aneurysms judged to be suitable for both treatments. We enrolled 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms and randomly assigned them to neurosurgical clipping (n=1070) or endovascular treatment by detachable platinum coils (n=1073). Clinical outcomes were assessed at 2 months and at 1 year with interim ascertainment of rebleeds and death. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin scale score of 3-6 (dependency or death) at 1 year. Trial recruitment was stopped by the steering committee after a planned interim analysis. Analysis was per protocol. 190 of 801 (23.7%) patients allocated endovascular treatment were dependent or dead at 1 year compared with 243 of 793 (30.6%) allocated neurosurgical treatment (p=0.0019). The relative and absolute risk reductions in dependency or death after allocation to an endovascular versus neurosurgical treatment were 22.6% (95% CI 8.9-34.2) and 6.9% (2.5-11.3), respectively. The risk of rebleeding from the ruptured aneurysm after 1 year was two per 1276 and zero per 1081 patient-years for patients allocated endovascular and neurosurgical treatment, respectively. In patients with a ruptured intracranial aneurysm, for which endovascular coiling and neurosurgical clipping are therapeutic options, the outcome in terms of survival free of disability at 1 year is significantly better with endovascular coiling. The data available to date suggest that the long-term risks of further bleeding from the treated aneurysm are low with either therapy, although somewhat more frequent with endovascular coiling.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms.

            We sought to better define the morbidity of endovascular Guglielmi detachable coil (GDC) treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms and to discuss its role in the prevention of subarachnoid hemorrhage. We conducted an observational study from August 1992 to June 1999 of 125 unruptured aneurysms treated with GDC in 116 patients: 91 women (78.4%) and 25 men (21.6%), aged 30 to 78 years (mean age, 50.6 years). Immediate and late clinical results were recorded for any neurological event or hemorrhage related to the treated unruptured aneurysm. Angiographic results are reported as immediate, early (2 to 12 months), intermediate (12 to 30 months), and late follow-up (>30 months). Immediate angiographic results showed complete obliteration (class 1) in 59 (47.2%) or residual neck (class 2) in 53 aneurysms (42.4%), leaving 6 residual aneurysms (4.8%) and 7 failures (5.6%). Early follow-up angiograms, available in 100 treated aneurysms (84%), revealed class 1 in 52% and class 2 in 41%. Intermediate angiograms, available in 53 aneurysms (44.5%), showed class 1 in 47.2% and class 2 in 43.4%, while late results, available in 37 lesions (31.1%), had class 1 and 2 in 48.6% and 37.8%, respectively. Six patients suffered a permanent neurological deficit at last follow-up (5.2%), with a good outcome in 5 patients and fair outcome in 1 patient. There was no mortality. There was no aneurysmal rupture during a mean clinical follow-up of 32.1 months. Endovascular treatment with GDC for unruptured aneurysms is relatively safe. Its role in the prevention of aneurysmal rupture remains to be determined, preferably by a randomized study.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study.

              The primary purpose of intracranial aneurysm treatment is to prevent rupture. Risk factors for rupture after aneurysm treatment have not been clearly established, and the need to completely occlude aneurysms is debated. The Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study is an ambidirectional cohort study of all patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with coil embolization or surgical clipping at 9 high-volume centers in the United States from 1996 to 1998. All subjects were followed through 2005, and all potential reruptures were adjudicated by a panel of 3 specialists without knowledge of the initial treatment or aneurysm characteristics. Degree of aneurysm occlusion post-treatment was evaluated as a predictor of nonprocedural rerupture in univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank test) and in a Cox proportional-hazards model after adjustment for potential confounders and censoring at time of retreatment. Among 1001 patients during a mean of 4.0 years follow-up, there were 19 postprocedural reruptures; median time to rerupture was 3 days and 58% led to death. The degree of aneurysm occlusion after treatment was strongly associated with risk of rerupture (overall risk: 1.1% for complete occlusion, 2.9% for 91% to 99% occlusion, 5.9% for 70% to 90%, 17.6% for <70%; P<0.0001 in univariate and multivariable analysis). Overall risk of rerupture tended to be greater after coil embolization compared with surgical clipping (3.4% versus 1.3%; P=0.092), but the difference did not persist after adjustment (P=0.83). Degree of aneurysm occlusion after the initial treatment is a strong predictor of the risk of subsequent rupture in patients presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage, which justifies attempts to completely occlude aneurysms.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg
                J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg
                JCEN
                Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery
                Korean Society of Cerebrovascular Surgeons; Society of Korean Endovascular Neurosurgeons
                2234-8565
                2287-3139
                September 2015
                30 September 2015
                : 17
                : 3
                : 209-216
                Affiliations
                Department of Neurosurgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Hee Sup Shin. Department of Neurosurgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul 05278, Korea. Tel: 82-2-440-6090, Fax: 82-2-440-8404, realeponym@ 123456hanmail.net
                Article
                10.7461/jcen.2015.17.3.209
                4626344
                26526272
                eccabd84-3672-419b-a7d2-9c5b6062342d
                © 2015 Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 26 June 2015
                : 01 August 2015
                : 24 August 2015
                Categories
                Original Article

                Surgery
                coil embolization, intracranial aneurysm, rebleeding,subarachnoid hemorrhage
                Surgery
                coil embolization, intracranial aneurysm, rebleeding, subarachnoid hemorrhage

                Comments

                Comment on this article