16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comprehensive Genetic Analysis of Japanese Autosomal Dominant Sensorineural Hearing Loss Patients

      research-article
      , , *
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In general, autosomal dominant inherited hearing loss does not have a founder mutation, with the causative mutation different in each family. For this reason, there has been a strong need for efficient diagnosis methods for autosomal dominant sensorineural hearing loss (ADSNHL) patients. This study sought to verify the effectiveness of our analysis algorithm for the screening of ADSNHL patients as well as the usefulness of the massively parallel DNA sequencing (MPS).

          Subjects and Methods

          Seventy-five Japanese ADSNHL patients from 53 ENT departments nationwide participated in this study. We conducted genetic analysis of 75 ADSNHL patients using the Invader assay, TaqMan genotyping assay and MPS-based genetic screening.

          Results

          A total of 46 (61.3%) ADSNHL patients were found to have at least one candidate gene variant.

          Conclusion

          We were able to achieve a high mutation detection rate through the combination of the Invader assay, TaqMan genotyping assay and MPS. MPS could be used to successfully identify mutations in rare deafness genes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Forty-six genes causing nonsyndromic hearing impairment: which ones should be analyzed in DNA diagnostics?

          Hearing impairment is the most common sensory disorder, present in 1 of every 500 newborns. With 46 genes implicated in nonsyndromic hearing loss, it is also an extremely heterogeneous trait. Here, we categorize for the first time all mutations reported in nonsyndromic deafness genes, both worldwide and more specifically in Caucasians. The most frequent genes implicated in autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss are GJB2, which is responsible for more than half of cases, followed by SLC26A4, MYO15A, OTOF, CDH23 and TMC1. None of the genes associated with autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss accounts for a preponderance of cases, although mutations are somewhat more frequently reported in WFS1, KCNQ4, COCH and GJB2. Only a minority of these genes is currently included in genetic diagnostics, the selection criteria typically reflecting: (1) high frequency as a cause of deafness (i.e. GJB2); (2) association with another recognisable feature (i.e. SLC26A4 and enlarged vestibular aqueduct); or (3) a recognisable audioprofile (i.e. WFS1). New and powerful DNA sequencing technologies have been developed over the past few years, but have not yet found their way into DNA diagnostics. Implementing these technologies is likely to happen within the next 5 years, and will cause a breakthrough in terms of power and cost efficiency. It will become possible to analyze most - if not all - deafness genes, as opposed to one or a few genes currently. This ability will greatly improve DNA diagnostics, provide epidemiological data on gene-based mutation frequencies, and reveal novel genotype-phenotype correlations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comprehensive genetic testing for hereditary hearing loss using massively parallel sequencing.

            The extreme genetic heterogeneity of nonsyndromic hearing loss (NSHL) makes genetic diagnosis expensive and time consuming using available methods. To assess the feasibility of target-enrichment and massively parallel sequencing technologies to interrogate all exons of all genes implicated in NSHL, we tested nine patients diagnosed with hearing loss. Solid-phase (NimbleGen) or solution-based (SureSelect) sequence capture, followed by 454 or Illumina sequencing, respectively, were compared. Sequencing reads were mapped using GSMAPPER, BFAST, and BOWTIE, and pathogenic variants were identified using a custom-variant calling and annotation pipeline (ASAP) that incorporates publicly available in silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, BLOSUM, Polyphen2, and Align-GVGD). Samples included one negative control, three positive controls (one biological replicate), and six unknowns (10 samples total), in which we genotyped 605 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) by Sanger sequencing to measure sensitivity and specificity for SureSelect-Illumina and NimbleGen-454 methods at saturating sequence coverage. Causative mutations were identified in the positive controls but not in the negative control. In five of six idiopathic hearing loss patients we identified the pathogenic mutation. Massively parallel sequencing technologies provide sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility at levels sufficient to perform genetic diagnosis of hearing loss.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Genetic etiology study of the non-syndromic deafness in Chinese Hans by targeted next-generation sequencing

              Background Although over 60 non-syndromic deafness genes have been identified to date, the etiologic contribution of most deafness genes remained elusive. In this study, we addressed this issue by targeted next-generation sequencing of a large cohort of non-syndromic deaf probands. Methods Probands with mutations in commonly screened deafness genes GJB2, SLC26A4 and MT-RNR1 were pre-excluded by Sanger sequencing. The remaining 125 deaf probands proceeded through targeted exon capturing of 79 known deafness genes and Illumina HiSeq2000 sequencing. Results Bi-allelic mutations in 15 less commonly screened deafness genes were identified in 28 deaf probands, with mutations in MYO15A, GPR98, TMC1, USH2A and PCDH15 being relatively more frequent (≥3 probands each). Dominant mutations in MYO6, TECTA, POU4F3 and COCH were identified in 4 deaf families. A mitochondrial MTTS1 mutation was identified in one maternally inherited deaf family. No pathogenic mutations were identified in three dominant deaf families and two consanguineous families. Conclusions Mutations in the less commonly screened deafness genes were heterogeneous and contributed to a significant percentage (17.4%) of causes for non-syndromic deafness. Targeted next-generation sequencing provided a comprehensive and efficient diagnosis for known deafness genes. Complementary to linkage analysis or whole-exome sequencing of deaf families, pre-exclusion of known deafness genes by this strategy may facilitate the discovery of novel deafness genes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                2 December 2016
                2016
                : 11
                : 12
                : e0166781
                Affiliations
                [001]Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390–8621, Japan
                Ajou University, REPUBLIC OF KOREA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: SU.

                • Data curation: SN.

                • Formal analysis: SN.

                • Funding acquisition: SU.

                • Investigation: SN.

                • Methodology: SN SU.

                • Project administration: SU.

                • Resources: SU.

                • Software: SN.

                • Supervision: SU.

                • Validation: YI SN SU.

                • Visualization: YI SN.

                • Writing – original draft: YI.

                • Writing – review & editing: SN SU.

                Article
                PONE-D-16-18658
                10.1371/journal.pone.0166781
                5135052
                27911912
                ecf4274b-994a-42bf-960e-4f52e890c444
                © 2016 Iwasa et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 9 May 2016
                : 3 November 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Pages: 11
                Funding
                This study was grant aided by a Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan Scientific Research Grant (H25-Kankaku-Ippan-002), Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (15dk0310011h0003), and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) (15H02565) from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Otorhinolaryngology
                Otology
                Hearing Disorders
                Deafness
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Gene Identification and Analysis
                Genetic Screens
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pediatrics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Gene Identification and Analysis
                Mutation Detection
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Molecular Biology
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Genotyping
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Genotyping
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Bioenergetics
                Energy-Producing Organelles
                Mitochondria
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Cell Biology
                Cellular Structures and Organelles
                Energy-Producing Organelles
                Mitochondria
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Genetic Dominance
                Dominant Traits
                Autosomal Dominant Traits
                Custom metadata
                Data access is controlled by data access community of the Shinshu University. Data are available from the Shinshu University Institutional Data access / Ethics Committee for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. If you would like to request access to this data set, please contact Shin-ichi Usami, usami@ 123456shinshu-u.ac.jp .

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article