37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A rapid evidence review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of alcohol control policies: an English perspective.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This paper reviews the evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies to reduce alcohol-related harm. Policies focus on price, marketing, availability, information and education, the drinking environment, drink-driving, and brief interventions and treatment. Although there is variability in research design and measured outcomes, evidence supports the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies that address affordability and marketing. An adequate reduction in temporal availability, particularly late night on-sale availability, is effective and cost-effective. Individually-directed interventions delivered to at-risk drinkers and enforced legislative measures are also effective. Providing information and education increases awareness, but is not sufficient to produce long-lasting changes in behaviour. At best, interventions enacted in and around the drinking environment lead to small reductions in acute alcohol-related harm. Overall, there is a rich evidence base to support the decisions of policy makers in implementing the most effective and cost-effective policies to reduce alcohol-related harm.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Lancet
          Lancet (London, England)
          Elsevier BV
          1474-547X
          0140-6736
          Apr 15 2017
          : 389
          : 10078
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Public Health England, London, UK; Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
          [2 ] Public Health England, London, UK. Electronic address: clive.henn@phe.gov.uk.
          [3 ] Public Health England, London, UK.
          [4 ] Public Health England, London, UK; Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
          [5 ] Public Health England, London, UK; Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
          [6 ] Public Health England, London, UK; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
          Article
          S0140-6736(16)32420-5
          10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32420-5
          27919442
          ed0dbec8-5ddf-4696-824b-ecc2040d1f62
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article