33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Correlation between Harris, modified Harris hip, and Oxford hip scores of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          BACKGROUND:

          Harris hip score (HHS), modified HHS (MHHS), and Oxford hip score (OHS) were designed to determine the functional outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between MHHS, HHS, and OHS in different populations of arthroplasty such as primary THA, revision THA, THA for Crowe Type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), and hip hemiarthroplasty (HA).

          METHODS:

          A total of 399 patients (254 females and 145 males) that included 128 cases of primary THA, 36 of revision THA, 200 of HA, and 35 of THA with femoral shortening osteotomy with a minimum of 24 months of follow-up were included. HHS, MHHS, and OHS were calculated for each patient and the correlation between theses scores was evaluated for each subgroup.

          RESULTS:

          The overall mean age was 67.5±14.3 years. The mean HHS, MHHS, and OHS were 74.9±17.9, 75.7±18.7, and 38.7±12.5, respectively. A very strong correlation was observed between HHS and MHHS (r=0.995, p=0.000) as well as between HHS and OHS (r=0.845, p=0.003) in the general study population. In subgroup analysis, there was a very strong correlation between HHS and MHHS in primary THA, revision THA, THA in hip HA, and Crowe Type IV DDH groups (r=0.984, p=0.000; r=0.977, p=0.000; r=0.984, p=0.000; and r=0.995, p=0.000; respectively). However, there was a significant correlation between HHS and OHS in these groups except revision THA group (r=0.851, p=0.023; r=0.587, p=0.069; r=0.989, p=0.002; and r=0.965, p=0.000; respectively).

          CONCLUSION:

          This is the first study to investigate the usefulness of MHHS and OHS in hip HA and THA in patients with Crowe Type IV DDH. Our findings suggest that MHHS and OHS are useful for evaluating functional outcomes with HA, primary and revision THA, and THA with femoral shortening osteotomy for Crowe type IV DDH.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement.

            We developed a 12-item questionnaire for completion by patients having total hip replacement (THR). A prospective study of 220 patients was undertaken before operation and at follow-up six months later. Each completed the new questionnaire as well as the SF36, and some the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS). An orthopaedic surgeon assessed the Charnley hip score. The single score derived from the questionnaire had a high internal consistency. Reproducibility was examined by test-retest reliability and was found to be satisfactory. The validity of the questionnaire was established by obtaining significant correlation in the expected direction with the Charnley scores and relevant scales of the SF36 and the AIMS. Sensitivity to change was assessed by analysing the differences between the preoperative scores and those at the follow-up. The standardised effect size for the new questionnaire compared favourably with that for the SF36 and the AIMS. The new questionnaire provides a measure of outcome for THR which is short, practical, reliable, valid and sensitive to clinically important changes.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for hip arthroscopic surgery.

              Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are considered the gold standard when evaluating outcomes in a surgical population. While the psychometric properties of some PROs have been tested, the properties of newer PROs in patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery remain somewhat unknown. To evaluate the reliability, validity, responsiveness, and interpretability of 5 PROs (Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score [HAGOS], Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [HOOS], Hip Outcome Score [HOS], International Hip Outcome Tool [iHOT-33], and Modified Harris Hip Score [MHHS]) in a population undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery and also to provide a recommendation of the best PROs in patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery. Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Study participants were adults (mean age, 37 ± 11 years) who had undergone hip arthroscopic surgery 12 to 24 months previously and pain-free, healthy age-matched controls (mean age, 35 ± 11 years). Baseline characteristics including age, height, weight, waist girth, physical activity, and occupation were collected for both groups. The hip arthroscopic surgery group completed the 5 PRO questionnaires on 3 occasions, while the healthy control group completed the PRO questionnaires on 1 occasion. The reliability (test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient, or ICC] and minimal detectable change [MDC]), validity (construct validity, ability to detect a difference between groups, acceptability including floor and ceiling effects), responsiveness, and interpretability (minimal important change [MIC]) of each measure were calculated. The test-retest reliability of PROs was excellent (ICC, 0.91-0.97), with an MDC of <20%. The HOOS, HAGOS, and iHOT-33 had acceptable content validity. All PROs demonstrated construct validity and were able to detect a difference between the hip arthroscopic surgery and control groups. No measures demonstrated a floor effect; however, the MHHS and subscales relating to activities of daily living of the HOOS, HOS, and HAGOS demonstrated a ceiling effect. The HOOS, iHOT-33, and MHHS demonstrated adequate responsiveness, and the MIC for all measures was <11 points of a possible 100 points. The PROs of the HOOS and iHOT-33 demonstrate psychometric properties that may enable researchers and clinicians to use them with confidence in a population undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery. The psychometric properties of the MHHS, HOS, and some subscales of the HAGOS are reduced, and these PROs may be less valuable in this group.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg
                Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg
                Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery
                Kare Publishing (Turkey )
                1306-696X
                1307-7945
                March 2022
                01 March 2022
                : 28
                : 3
                : 308-314
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Bursa Çekirge State Hospital, Bursa- Turkey
                [2 ]Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Basaksehir Pine and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul- Turkey
                [3 ]Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Bursa Acıbadem Hospital, Bursa- Turkey
                [4 ]Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Sivas Şarkışla State Hospital, Sivas- Turkey
                [5 ]Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri- Turkey
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Gokay Eken, M.D. Bursa Acıbadem Hastanesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kliniği, Bursa, Turkey Tel: +90 224 - 270 44 44 E-mail: gokay_eken@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                TJTES-28-308
                10.14744/tjtes.2020.74560
                10493521
                35485571
                ed26d207-7cc9-4e0c-88a7-c8fea8574e94
                Copyright © 2022 Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

                History
                : 13 October 2020
                : 11 December 2020
                Categories
                Original Article

                correlation,crowe type iv developmental dysplasia of the hip,harris hip score,hemiarthroplasty,modified,range of motion

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log