15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Greenhouse gas emissions of self-selected diets in the UK and their association with diet quality: is energy under-reporting a problem?

      research-article
      1 , , 2
      Nutrition Journal
      BioMed Central
      Sustainable diets, Healthy diets, Food consumption, Misreporting

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          While the admittedly limited number of epidemiological findings on the association between diet-related greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) and diet quality are not always consistent, potential influence of bias in the estimation of diet-related GHGE caused by misreporting of energy intake (EI) has not been investigated. This cross-sectional study evaluated diet-related GHGE in the UK and their association with diet quality, taking account of EI under-reporting.

          Methods

          Dietary data used were from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey rolling programme 2008/2009–2013/2014, in which 4-day food diaries were collected from 3502 adults aged ≥19 years. Diet-related GHGE were estimated based on 133 food groups, using GHGE values from various secondary sources. Diet quality was assessed by the healthy diet indicator (HDI), Mediterranean diet score (MDS) and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) score. EI misreporting was assessed as reported EI divided by estimated energy requirement (EI:EER).

          Results

          Mean value of daily GHGE was 5.7 kg carbon dioxide equivalents (CO 2eq), which is consistent with those reported from a number of national representative samples in other European countries. Mean EI:EER was 0.74. Assuming that all the dietary variables were misreported in proportion to the misreporting of EI, the mean value of the misreporting-adjusted diet-related GHGE was 8.2 kg CO 2eq/d. In the entire population, after adjustment for potential confounders (i.e., age, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic classification, smoking status and physical activity), diet-related GHGE were inversely associated with HDI and DASH score but not with MDS. However, with further adjustment for EI:EER, diet-related GHGE showed inverse associations with all three measures of diet quality. Similar associations were observed when only under-reporters (EI:EER < 0.70; n = 1578) were analysed. Conversely, in the analysis including only plausible reporters (EI:EER 0.70–1.43; n = 1895), diet-related GHGE showed inverse associations with all diet quality measures irrespective of adjustment.

          Conclusions

          With taking account of EI under-reporting, this study showed inverse associations between diet-related GHGE and diet quality not only in the entire sample but also in the separate analyses of plausible reporters and under-reporters, as well as potential underreporting of diet-related GHGE.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12937-018-0338-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The Impacts of Dietary Change on Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Land Use, Water Use, and Health: A Systematic Review

          Food production is a major driver of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, water and land use, and dietary risk factors are contributors to non-communicable diseases. Shifts in dietary patterns can therefore potentially provide benefits for both the environment and health. However, there is uncertainty about the magnitude of these impacts, and the dietary changes necessary to achieve them. We systematically review the evidence on changes in GHG emissions, land use, and water use, from shifting current dietary intakes to environmentally sustainable dietary patterns. We find 14 common sustainable dietary patterns across reviewed studies, with reductions as high as 70–80% of GHG emissions and land use, and 50% of water use (with medians of about 20–30% for these indicators across all studies) possible by adopting sustainable dietary patterns. Reductions in environmental footprints were generally proportional to the magnitude of animal-based food restriction. Dietary shifts also yielded modest benefits in all-cause mortality risk. Our review reveals that environmental and health benefits are possible by shifting current Western diets to a variety of more sustainable dietary patterns.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: the OPEN study.

            This paper describes the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) Study, conducted from September 1999 to March 2000. The purpose of the study was to assess dietary measurement error using two self-reported dietary instruments-the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and the 24-hour dietary recall (24HR)-and unbiased biomarkers of energy and protein intakes: doubly labeled water and urinary nitrogen. Participants were 484 men and women aged 40-69 years from Montgomery County, Maryland. Nine percent of men and 7% of women were defined as underreporters of both energy and protein intake on 24HRs; for FFQs, the comparable values were 35% for men and 23% for women. On average, men underreported energy intake compared with total energy expenditure by 12-14% on 24HRs and 31-36% on FFQs and underreported protein intake compared with a protein biomarker by 11-12% on 24HRs and 30-34% on FFQs. Women underreported energy intake on 24HRs by 16-20% and on FFQs by 34-38% and underreported protein intake by 11-15% on 24HRs and 27-32% on FFQs. There was little underreporting of the percentage of energy from protein for men or women. These findings have important implications for nutritional epidemiology and dietary surveillance.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Where are the best opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the food system (including the food chain)?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +81 3 5841 7872 , kenmrkm@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp
                Journal
                Nutr J
                Nutr J
                Nutrition Journal
                BioMed Central (London )
                1475-2891
                21 February 2018
                21 February 2018
                2018
                : 17
                : 27
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2151 536X, GRID grid.26999.3d, Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies, , University of Tokyo, ; Tokyo, 113 0033 Japan
                [2 ]ISNI 0000000105519715, GRID grid.12641.30, Northern Ireland Centre for Food and Health, , Ulster University, ; Coleraine, BT52 1SA UK
                Article
                338
                10.1186/s12937-018-0338-x
                5822528
                29466993
                ed27c9f8-51ac-4361-9c64-e12fa15e0c6d
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 27 October 2017
                : 13 February 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
                Award ID: 15K16213
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Nutrition & Dietetics
                sustainable diets,healthy diets,food consumption,misreporting
                Nutrition & Dietetics
                sustainable diets, healthy diets, food consumption, misreporting

                Comments

                Comment on this article