38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Associations between vascular risk factors and brain MRI indices in UK Biobank

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          Several factors are known to increase risk for cerebrovascular disease and dementia, but there is limited evidence on associations between multiple vascular risk factors (VRFs) and detailed aspects of brain macrostructure and microstructure in large community-dwelling populations across middle and older age.

          Methods and results

          Associations between VRFs (smoking, hypertension, pulse pressure, diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia, body mass index, and waist–hip ratio) and brain structural and diffusion MRI markers were examined in UK Biobank ( N = 9722, age range 44–79 years). A larger number of VRFs was associated with greater brain atrophy, lower grey matter volume, and poorer white matter health. Effect sizes were small (brain structural R 2 ≤1.8%). Higher aggregate vascular risk was related to multiple regional MRI hallmarks associated with dementia risk: lower frontal and temporal cortical volumes, lower subcortical volumes, higher white matter hyperintensity volumes, and poorer white matter microstructure in association and thalamic pathways. Smoking pack years, hypertension and diabetes showed the most consistent associations across all brain measures. Hypercholesterolaemia was not uniquely associated with any MRI marker.

          Conclusion

          Higher levels of VRFs were associated with poorer brain health across grey and white matter macrostructure and microstructure. Effects are mainly additive, converging upon frontal and temporal cortex, subcortical structures, and specific classes of white matter fibres. Though effect sizes were small, these results emphasize the vulnerability of brain health to vascular factors even in relatively healthy middle and older age, and the potential to partly ameliorate cognitive decline by addressing these malleable risk factors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The role of brain vasculature in neurodegenerative disorders

            Adequate supply of blood and structural and functional integrity of blood vessels is key to normal brain functioning. On the other hand, cerebral blood flow (CBF) shortfalls and blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction are early findings in neurodegenerative disorders in humans and animal models. Here, we first examine molecular definition of cerebral blood vessels, and pathways regulating CBF and BBB integrity. Then, we examine the role of CBF and BBB in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and multiple sclerosis. We focus on AD as a platform of our analysis because more is known about neurovascular dysfunction in this disease than in other neurodegenerative disorders. Finally, we propose a hypothetical model of AD biomarkers to include brain vasculature as a factor contributing to the disease onset and progression, and suggest a common pathway linking brain vascular contributions to neurodegeneration in multiple neurodegenerative disorders.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Arterial stiffness, pressure and flow pulsatility and brain structure and function: the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility--Reykjavik study.

              Aortic stiffness increases with age and vascular risk factor exposure and is associated with increased risk for structural and functional abnormalities in the brain. High ambient flow and low impedance are thought to sensitize the cerebral microcirculation to harmful effects of excessive pressure and flow pulsatility. However, haemodynamic mechanisms contributing to structural brain lesions and cognitive impairment in the presence of high aortic stiffness remain unclear. We hypothesized that disproportionate stiffening of the proximal aorta as compared with the carotid arteries reduces wave reflection at this important interface and thereby facilitates transmission of excessive pulsatile energy into the cerebral microcirculation, leading to microvascular damage and impaired function. To assess this hypothesis, we evaluated carotid pressure and flow, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, brain magnetic resonance images and cognitive scores in participants in the community-based Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility--Reykjavik study who had no history of stroke, transient ischaemic attack or dementia (n = 668, 378 females, 69-93 years of age). Aortic characteristic impedance was assessed in a random subset (n = 422) and the reflection coefficient at the aorta-carotid interface was computed. Carotid flow pulsatility index was negatively related to the aorta-carotid reflection coefficient (R = -0.66, P<0.001). Carotid pulse pressure, pulsatility index and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity were each associated with increased risk for silent subcortical infarcts (hazard ratios of 1.62-1.71 per standard deviation, P<0.002). Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was associated with higher white matter hyperintensity volume (0.108 ± 0.045 SD/SD, P = 0.018). Pulsatility index was associated with lower whole brain (-0.127 ± 0.037 SD/SD, P<0.001), grey matter (-0.079 ± 0.038 SD/SD, P = 0.038) and white matter (-0.128 ± 0.039 SD/SD, P<0.001) volumes. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (-0.095 ± 0.043 SD/SD, P = 0.028) and carotid pulse pressure (-0.114 ± 0.045 SD/SD, P = 0.013) were associated with lower memory scores. Pulsatility index was associated with lower memory scores (-0.165 ± 0.039 SD/SD, P<0.001), slower processing speed (-0.118 ± 0.033 SD/SD, P<0.001) and worse performance on tests assessing executive function (-0.155 ± 0.041 SD/SD, P<0.001). When magnetic resonance imaging measures (grey and white matter volumes, white matter hyperintensity volumes and prevalent subcortical infarcts) were included in cognitive models, haemodynamic associations were attenuated or no longer significant, consistent with the hypothesis that increased aortic stiffness and excessive flow pulsatility damage the microcirculation, leading to quantifiable tissue damage and reduced cognitive performance. Marked stiffening of the aorta is associated with reduced wave reflection at the interface between carotid and aorta, transmission of excessive flow pulsatility into the brain, microvascular structural brain damage and lower scores in various cognitive domains.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur Heart J
                Eur. Heart J
                eurheartj
                European Heart Journal
                Oxford University Press
                0195-668X
                1522-9645
                21 July 2019
                11 March 2019
                11 March 2019
                : 40
                : 28
                : 2290-2300
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, The University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh, UK
                [2 ]Department of Psychology, The University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh, UK
                [3 ]Scottish Imaging Network, A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, 300 Bath St, Glasgow, UK
                [4 ]Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, UK
                [5 ]Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, UK
                [6 ]Brain Research Imaging Centre, Neuroimaging Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, UK
                [7 ]Division of Psychiatry, The University of Edinburgh, Kennedy Tower, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Morningside Park, Edinburgh, UK
                [8 ]Alzheimer Centre Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [9 ]NHS Lothian, Waverley Gate, 2-4 Waterloo Place, Edinburgh, UK
                [10 ]Department of Psychology, University of Texas, 108 E Dean Keeton St, Austin, Texas, USA
                [11 ]UK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh BioQuarter, Edinburgh, UK
                [12 ]MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK
                Author notes
                Corresponding author. Tel: 44 (0)131 650 8493, Email: simon.cox@ 123456ed.ac.uk
                Article
                ehz100
                10.1093/eurheartj/ehz100
                6642726
                30854560
                ed2dabff-7d2e-4a4e-adb8-eadc15f64742
                © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 08 January 2019
                : 23 January 2019
                : 19 February 2019
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Funding
                Funded by: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council 10.13039/501100000268
                Funded by: BBSRC 10.13039/501100000268
                Funded by: Medical Research Council 10.13039/501100000265
                Funded by: MRC 10.13039/501100000265
                Award ID: MR/M013111/1
                Award ID: MR/R024065/1
                Funded by: Dementias Platform UK
                Award ID: MR/L015382/1
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
                Award ID: R01AG054628
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
                Award ID: RO1HD083613
                Funded by: NIH 10.13039/100000002
                Award ID: P2CHD042849
                Funded by: Scottish Imaging Network: A Platform for Scientific Excellence
                Funded by: SINAPSE
                Funded by: MRC 10.13039/501100000265
                Award ID: MR/L023784/2
                Categories
                Fast Track Clinical Research
                Imaging
                Editor's Choice

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                vascular risk,brain,mri,diffusion,white matter,cortex
                Cardiovascular Medicine
                vascular risk, brain, mri, diffusion, white matter, cortex

                Comments

                Comment on this article