29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Use of a Structured Mirrors Intervention Does Not Reduce Delirium Incidence But May Improve Factual Memory Encoding in Cardiac Surgical ICU Patients Aged Over 70 Years: A Pilot Time-Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction: Post-operative delirium remains a significant problem, particularly in the older surgical patient. Previous evidence suggests that the provision of supplementary visual feedback about ones environment via the use of a mirror may positively impact on mental status and attention (core delirium diagnostic domains). We aimed to explore whether use of an evidence-based mirrors intervention could be effective in reducing delirium and improving post-operative outcomes such as factual memory encoding of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) environment in older cardiac surgical patients.

          Methods: This was a pilot time-cluster randomized controlled trial at a 32-bed ICU, enrolling 223 patients aged 70 years and over, admitted to ICU after elective or urgent cardiac surgery from October 29, 2012 to June 23, 2013. The Mirrors Group received a structured mirrors intervention at set times (e.g., following change in mental status). The Usual Care Group received the standard care without mirrors. Primary outcome was ICU delirium incidence; secondary outcomes were ICU delirium days, ICU days with altered mental status or inattention, total length of ICU stay, physical mobilization (balance confidence) at ICU discharge, recall of factual and delusional ICU memories at 12 weeks, Health-Related Quality of Life at 12 weeks, and acceptability of the intervention.

          Results: The intervention was not associated with a significant reduction in ICU delirium incidence [Mirrors: 20/115 (17%); Usual Care: 17/108 (16%)] or duration [Mirrors: 1 (1–3); Usual Care: 2 (1–8)]. Use of the intervention on ICU was predictive of significantly higher recall of factual (but not delusional) items at 12 weeks after surgery ( p = 0.003) and acceptability was high, with clinicians using mirrors at 86% of all recorded hourly observations. The intervention did not significantly impact on other secondary outcomes.

          Conclusion: Use of a structured mirrors intervention on the post-operative ICU does not reduce delirium, but may result in improved factual memory encoding in older cardiac surgical patients. This effect may occur via mechanisms unrelated to delirium, altered mental status, or inattention. The intervention may provide a new means of improving outcomes in patients at risk of post-ICU anxiety and/or Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.

          Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01599689.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Delirium in older persons.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE).

              To construct a scoring system for the prediction of early mortality in cardiac surgical patients in Europe on the basis of objective risk factors. The EuroSCORE database was divided into developmental and validation subsets. In the former, risk factors deemed to be objective, credible, obtainable and difficult to falsify were weighted on the basis of regression analysis. An additive score of predicted mortality was constructed. Its calibration and discrimination characteristics were assessed in the validation dataset. Thresholds were defined to distinguish low, moderate and high risk groups. The developmental dataset had 13,302 patients, calibration by Hosmer Lemeshow Chi square was (8) = 8.26 (P 200 micromol/l (2), active endocarditis (3) and critical preoperative state (3). Cardiac factors were unstable angina on intravenous nitrates (2), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (30-50%: 1, 60 mmHg (2). Operation-related factors were emergency (2), other than isolated coronary surgery (2), thoracic aorta surgery (3) and surgery for postinfarct septal rupture (4). The scoring system was then applied to three risk groups. The low risk group (EuroSCORE 1-2) had 4529 patients with 36 deaths (0.8%), 95% confidence limits for observed mortality (0.56-1.10) and for expected mortality (1.27-1.29). The medium risk group (EuroSCORE 3-5) had 5977 patients with 182 deaths (3%), observed mortality (2.62-3.51), predicted (2.90-2.94). The high risk group (EuroSCORE 6 plus) had 4293 patients with 480 deaths (11.2%) observed mortality (10.25-12.16), predicted (10.93-11.54). Overall, there were 698 deaths in 14,799 patients (4.7%), observed mortality (4.37-5.06), predicted (4.72-4.95). EuroSCORE is a simple, objective and up-to-date system for assessing heart surgery, soundly based on one of the largest, most complete and accurate databases in European cardiac surgical history. We recommend its widespread use.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Aging Neurosci
                Front Aging Neurosci
                Front. Aging Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1663-4365
                28 September 2016
                2016
                : 8
                : 228
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Cognitive Research Unit, Research & Development Department, Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge, UK
                [2] 2Critical Care Unit, Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge, UK
                [3] 3Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds Leeds, UK
                [4] 4Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge Cambridge, UK
                [5] 5Cognition, Emotion, and Mental Health Programme, Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit Cambridge, UK
                [6] 6Physiotherapy Department, Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge, UK
                [7] 7Cardiac Services, Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge, UK
                [8] 8Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge, UK
                Author notes

                Edited by: Rodrigo Orlando Kuljiš, University of Miami School of Medicine, USA

                Reviewed by: Angélique M. E. Spoelstra-de Man, VU University Medical Center, Netherlands; Umesh Gangishetti, Emory University, USA

                *Correspondence: Alain Vuylsteke, a.vuylsteke@ 123456nhs.net
                Article
                10.3389/fnagi.2016.00228
                5039170
                27733826
                ed7f2e87-9fcd-4717-ad07-0367d06f0d08
                Copyright © 2016 Giraud, Pontin, Sharples, Fletcher, Dalgleish, Eden, Jenkins and Vuylsteke.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 22 October 2015
                : 13 September 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 35, Pages: 7, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: Dunhill Medical Trust 10.13039/501100000377
                Award ID: SA16/0212
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Clinical Trial

                Neurosciences
                delirium,mirror,cardiac surgery,post-operative,factual memories,delusional memories,intensive care unit (icu),post-traumatic stress disorder (ptsd)

                Comments

                Comment on this article