1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Current GBIF occurrence data demonstrates both promise and limitations for potential red listing of spiders

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract

          Conservation assessments of hyperdiverse groups of organisms are often challenging and limited by the availability of occurrence data needed to calculate assessment metrics such as extent of occurrence (EOO). Spiders represent one such diverse group and have historically been assessed using primary literature with retrospective georeferencing. Here we demonstrate the differences in estimations of EOO and hypothetical IUCN Red List classifications for two extensive spider datasets comprising 479 species in total. The EOO were estimated and compared using literature-based assessments, Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF)-based assessments and combined data assessments. We found that although few changes to hypothetical IUCN Red List classifications occurred with the addition of GBIF data, some species (3.3%) which could previously not be classified could now be assessed with the addition of GBIF data. In addition, the hypothetical classification changed for others (1.5%). On the other hand, GBIF data alone did not provide enough data for 88.7% of species. These results demonstrate the potential of GBIF data to serve as an additional source of information for conservation assessments, complementing literature data, but not particularly useful on its own as it stands right now for spiders.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Toward monitoring global biodiversity

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Research and Societal Benefits of the Global Biodiversity Information Facility

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Online solutions and the ‘Wallacean shortfall’: what does GBIF contribute to our knowledge of species' ranges?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Biodivers Data J
                Biodivers Data J
                1
                urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:F9B2E808-C883-5F47-B276-6D62129E4FF4
                urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:245B00E9-BFE5-4B4F-B76E-15C30BA74C02
                Biodiversity Data Journal
                Pensoft Publishers
                1314-2828
                2019
                19 December 2019
                : 7
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research (LIBRe), Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research (LIBRe), Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
                [2 ] Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America Georgetown University Washington, DC United States of America
                [3 ] The Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, Philadelphia, United States of America The Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University Philadelphia United States of America
                Author notes
                Corresponding authors: Vaughn Shirey ( vmshirey@ 123456gmail.com ), Pedro Cardoso ( pedro.cardoso@ 123456helsinki.fi ).

                Academic editor: Jeremy Miller

                Article
                47369 12433
                10.3897/BDJ.7.e47369
                6933025
                Vaughn Shirey, Sini Seppälä, Vasco Veiga Branco, Pedro Cardoso

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 2, References: 23
                Categories
                Research Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article