7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Guide Catheter-Induced Aortic Dissection Complicated by Pericardial Effusion with Pulsus Paradoxus: A Case Report of Successful Medical Management

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aortic dissection is a rare but potentially fatal complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Management strategies of PCI induced dissection are not clearly identified in literature; such occurrences often mandate surgical repair of the aortic root with reimplantation of the coronary arteries. Another trend seen in case reports is the use of coronary-aortic stenting if such lesions permit. Several factors impact the management decision including the hemodynamic stability of the patient; mechanism of aortic injury; size, severity, and direction of propagation of the dissection; presence of an intimal flap; and preexisting atherosclerotic disease. We describe a case of a 65-year-old woman who underwent PCI for a chronic right coronary artery (RCA) occlusion, which was complicated by aortic dissection and pericardial effusion. Our case report suggests that nonsurgical management may also be appropriate for PCI induced dissections, and potentially even those associated with new pericardial effusion.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Contemporary results of surgery in acute type A aortic dissection: The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection experience.

          Surgical mortality for acute type A aortic dissection reported in different experiences from single centers or surgeons varies from 7% to 30%. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection, collecting patients from 18 referral centers worldwide, identifies a preoperative risk stratification scheme and a real average surgical mortality for acute type A aortic dissection in the current era. A comprehensive analysis was completed of 290 clinical variables and their relationship to surgical outcomes in 526 of 1032 patients enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection from 1996 through 2001. Extracted cases, categorized according to risk profile, were defined as unstable (group I) in the presence of cardiac tamponade; shock; congestive heart failure; cerebrovascular accident; stroke; coma; myocardial ischemia, infarction, or both; electrocardiograms with new Q waves or ST elevation; acute renal failure; or mesenteric ischemia-infarction at the time of the operation. Outside of an unstable condition, patients were categorized as stable (group II). The overall in-hospital mortality was 25.1%. Mortality in group I was 31.4% compared with 16.7% in group II ( P < .001). Independent preoperative predictors of operative mortality were history of aortic valve replacement (odds ratio = 3.12), migrating chest pain (odds ratio = 2.77), hypotension as sign of acute type A aortic dissection (odds ratio = 1.95), shock or tamponade (odds ratio = 2.69), preoperative cardiac tamponade (odds ratio = 2.22), and preoperative limb ischemia (odds ratio = 2.10). The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection experience confirms that patient selection plays an important role in determining surgical outcomes in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. Knowledge of significant risk factors for operative mortality can contribute to better management and a more defined risk assessment in patients affected by acute type A aortic dissection.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Acute aortic syndromes.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Iatrogenic coronary artery dissections extending into and involving the aortic root.

              We set out to determine the incidence of iatrogenic coronary artery dissection extending into the aorta and to characterize the aortic lesions. We reviewed the data from 43,143 cardiac catheterizations from September 1993 through September 1999 and found 9 coronary artery-aortic dissections for an overall incidence of 0.02%. Four of these patients were undergoing treatment for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and aortic dissection was more common than for non-AMI patients (0.19% vs. 0.01%, P 40 mm from the coronary os required surgical intervention.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Case Rep Med
                Case Rep Med
                CRIM
                Case Reports in Medicine
                Hindawi Publishing Corporation
                1687-9627
                1687-9635
                2015
                1 January 2015
                : 2015
                : 480242
                Affiliations
                1Department of Internal Medicine, SUNY Downstate Health Science Center, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA
                2Department of Interventional Cardiology, SUNY Downstate Health Science Center, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA
                Author notes
                *Jonathan D. Marmur: jmarmur@ 123456gmail.com

                Academic Editor: Grigorios Korosoglou

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1192-2898
                Article
                10.1155/2015/480242
                4313002
                ed80dfaf-d468-46da-861a-2eefc3abb3e9
                Copyright © 2015 Magdalene Fiddler et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 2 September 2014
                : 8 December 2014
                Categories
                Case Report

                Comments

                Comment on this article