64
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Guidelines for monitoring autophagy in Caenorhabditis elegans

      review-article
      1 , * , 2 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 2 , 2 , , 5 , 1 , 1 , , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 1
      Autophagy
      Taylor & Francis
      autophagy, C. elegans, development, LC3, SQSTM1, ASEL, ASE left, ASER, ASE right, ATG, autophagy-related, epg, ectopic PGL granules, ER, endoplasmic reticulum, GFP, green fluorescent protein, lgg-1, LC3, GABARAP and GATE-16 family, MO, membranous organelle, PGL, P-granule abnormality, RER, rough endoplasmic reticulum, SQST, SeQueSTosome related protein, TEM, transmission electron microscopy

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The cellular recycling process of autophagy has been extensively characterized with standard assays in yeast and mammalian cell lines. In multicellular organisms, numerous external and internal factors differentially affect autophagy activity in specific cell types throughout the stages of organismal ontogeny, adding complexity to the analysis of autophagy in these metazoans. Here we summarize currently available assays for monitoring the autophagic process in the nematode C. elegans. A combination of measuring levels of the lipidated Atg8 ortholog LGG-1, degradation of well-characterized autophagic substrates such as germline P granule components and the SQSTM1/p62 ortholog SQST-1, expression of autophagic genes and electron microscopy analysis of autophagic structures are presently the most informative, yet steady-state, approaches available to assess autophagy levels in C. elegans. We also review how altered autophagy activity affects a variety of biological processes in C. elegans such as L1 survival under starvation conditions, dauer formation, aging, and cell death, as well as neuronal cell specification. Taken together, C. elegans is emerging as a powerful model organism to monitor autophagy while evaluating important physiological roles for autophagy in key developmental events as well as during adulthood.

          Related collections

          Most cited references71

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy.

          In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dynamics and diversity in autophagy mechanisms: lessons from yeast.

            Autophagy is a fundamental function of eukaryotic cells and is well conserved from yeast to humans. The most remarkable feature of autophagy is the synthesis of double membrane-bound compartments that sequester materials to be degraded in lytic compartments, a process that seems to be mechanistically distinct from conventional membrane traffic. The discovery of autophagy in yeast and the genetic tractability of this organism have allowed us to identify genes that are responsible for this process, which has led to the explosive growth of this research field seen today. Analyses of autophagy-related (Atg) proteins have unveiled dynamic and diverse aspects of mechanisms that underlie membrane formation during autophagy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Autophagy controls Salmonella infection in response to damage to the Salmonella-containing vacuole.

              Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) is a facultative intracellular pathogen that causes disease in a variety of hosts. S. Typhimurium actively invade host cells and typically reside within a membrane-bound compartment called the Salmonella-containing vacuole (SCV). The bacteria modify the fate of the SCV using two independent type III secretion systems (TTSS). TTSS are known to damage eukaryotic cell membranes and S. Typhimurium has been suggested to damage the SCV using its Salmonella pathogenicity island (SPI)-1 encoded TTSS. Here we show that this damage gives rise to an intracellular bacterial population targeted by the autophagy system during in vitro infection. Approximately 20% of intracellular S. Typhimurium colocalized with the autophagy marker GFP-LC3 at 1 h postinfection. Autophagy of S. Typhimurium was dependent upon the SPI-1 TTSS and bacterial protein synthesis. Bacteria targeted by the autophagy system were often associated with ubiquitinated proteins, indicating their exposure to the cytosol. Surprisingly, these bacteria also colocalized with SCV markers. Autophagy-deficient (atg5-/-) cells were more permissive for intracellular growth by S. Typhimurium than normal cells, allowing increased bacterial growth in the cytosol. We propose a model in which the host autophagy system targets bacteria in SCVs damaged by the SPI-1 TTSS. This serves to retain intracellular S. Typhimurium within vacuoles early after infection to protect the cytosol from bacterial colonization. Our findings support a role for autophagy in innate immunity and demonstrate that Salmonella infection is a powerful model to study the autophagy process.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Autophagy
                Autophagy
                KAUP
                Autophagy
                Taylor & Francis
                1554-8627
                1554-8635
                8 January 2015
                January 2015
                : 11
                : 1
                : 9-27
                Affiliations
                [1 ]State Key Laboratory of Biomacromolecules; Institute of Biophysics; Chinese Academy of Sciences ; Beijing, China
                [2 ]Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute; Program of Development, Aging and Regeneration ; La Jolla, CA USA
                [3 ]Department of Biological Sciences; Florida Atlantic University ; Jupiter, FL USA
                [4 ]Department of Anatomy, Cell and Developmental Biology; Eötvös Loránd University ; Budapest, Hungary
                [5 ]Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell; Paris-Saclay University ; CEA; CNRS; Cedex, France
                [6 ]Department of Biology; Queens College and the Graduate Center at the City University of New York ; Flushing, NY USA
                [7 ]Department of Biology; University of Virginia ; Charlottesville, VA USA
                [8 ]Laboratory of Molecular Traffic; Institute for Molecular and Cellular Regulation; Gunma University ; Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
                [9 ]Laboratory of Molecular Membrane Biology; Institute for Molecular and Cellular Regulation; Gunma University ; Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
                [10 ]National Institute of Biological Sciences ; Beijing, China
                []Current address: Brown University; Department of Molecular Biology; Cell Biology and Biochemistry ; Providence, RI USA
                []Current address: Department of Pathology and Immunology; Washington University School of Medicine ; St. Louis, MO USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Hong Zhang; Email: hongzhang@ 123456sun5.ibp.ac.cn
                Article
                1003478
                10.1080/15548627.2014.1003478
                4502811
                25569839
                ed9ff281-2371-4a4a-b20e-5fbfd406afc9
                © 2015 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis© Hong Zhang, Jessica T Chang, Bin Guo, Malene Hansen, Kailiang Jia, Attila L Kovacs, Caroline Kumsta, Louis R Lapierre, Renaud Legouis, Long Lin, Qun Lu, Alicia Melendez, Eyleen J O'Rourke, Ken Sato, Miyuki Sato, Xiaochen Wang, and Fan Wu

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.

                History
                : 15 September 2014
                : 28 October 2014
                : 9 December 2014
                Page count
                Figures: 11, Tables: 2, References: 90, Pages: 19
                Categories
                Reviews

                Molecular biology
                autophagy,c. elegans,development,lc3,sqstm1,asel, ase left,aser, ase right,atg, autophagy-related,epg, ectopic pgl granules,er, endoplasmic reticulum,gfp, green fluorescent protein,lgg-1, lc3, gabarap and gate-16 family,mo, membranous organelle,pgl, p-granule abnormality,rer, rough endoplasmic reticulum,sqst, sequestosome related protein,tem, transmission electron microscopy

                Comments

                Comment on this article