14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Prognostic Model Based on Residual Cancer Burden and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes on Residual Disease after Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2+ Breast Cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose:

          We aim to evaluate the prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte on residual disease (RD-TIL) in HER2+ patients with breast cancer who failed to achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) after anti-HER2+ chemotherapy (CT)-based neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). We assessed the feasibility of combining the prognostic information provided by residual cancer burden (RCB) and RD-TILs into a composite score (RCB+TIL).

          Experimental Design:

          HER2+ patients with breast cancer treated with CT+anti-HER2-based NAT at three institutions were retrospectively included. RCB and TIL levels were evaluated on hematoxylin and eosin–stained slides from surgical samples according to available recommendations. Overall survival (OS) was used as an outcome measure.

          Results:

          A total of 295 patients were included, of whom 195 had RD. RCB was significantly associated with OS. Higher RD-TILs were significantly associated with poorer OS as compared with lower RD-TILs (15% cutoff). In multivariate analysis, both RCB and RD-TIL maintained their independent prognostic value. A combined score, RCB+TIL, was calculated from the estimated coefficient of RD-TILs and the RCB index in a bivariate logistic model for OS. The RCB+TIL score was significantly associated with OS. The C-index for OS of the RCB+TIL score was numerically higher than that of RCB and significantly higher than that of RD-TILs.

          Conclusions:

          We have reported an independent prognostic impact of RD-TILs after anti-HER2+CT NAT, which might underlie an imbalance of the RD microenvironment towards immunosuppressive features. We provided a new composite prognostic score based on RCB+TIL, which was significantly associated with OS and proved to be more informative than the isolated evaluation of RCB and RD-TILs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis.

          Pathological complete response has been proposed as a surrogate endpoint for prediction of long-term clinical benefit, such as disease-free survival, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). We had four key objectives: to establish the association between pathological complete response and EFS and OS, to establish the definition of pathological complete response that correlates best with long-term outcome, to identify the breast cancer subtypes in which pathological complete response is best correlated with long-term outcome, and to assess whether an increase in frequency of pathological complete response between treatment groups predicts improved EFS and OS. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Medline for clinical trials of neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. To be eligible, studies had to meet three inclusion criteria: include at least 200 patients with primary breast cancer treated with preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery; have available data for pathological complete response, EFS, and OS; and have a median follow-up of at least 3 years. We compared the three most commonly used definitions of pathological complete response--ypT0 ypN0, ypT0/is ypN0, and ypT0/is--for their association with EFS and OS in a responder analysis. We assessed the association between pathological complete response and EFS and OS in various subgroups. Finally, we did a trial-level analysis to assess whether pathological complete response could be used as a surrogate endpoint for EFS or OS. We obtained data from 12 identified international trials and 11 955 patients were included in our responder analysis. Eradication of tumour from both breast and lymph nodes (ypT0 ypN0 or ypT0/is ypN0) was better associated with improved EFS (ypT0 ypN0: hazard ratio [HR] 0·44, 95% CI 0·39-0·51; ypT0/is ypN0: 0·48, 0·43-0·54) and OS (0·36, 0·30-0·44; 0·36, 0·31-0·42) than was tumour eradication from the breast alone (ypT0/is; EFS: HR 0·60, 95% CI 0·55-0·66; OS 0·51, 0·45-0·58). We used the ypT0/is ypN0 definition for all subsequent analyses. The association between pathological complete response and long-term outcomes was strongest in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (EFS: HR 0·24, 95% CI 0·18-0·33; OS: 0·16, 0·11-0·25) and in those with HER2-positive, hormone-receptor-negative tumours who received trastuzumab (EFS: 0·15, 0·09-0·27; OS: 0·08, 0·03, 0·22). In the trial-level analysis, we recorded little association between increases in frequency of pathological complete response and EFS (R(2)=0·03, 95% CI 0·00-0·25) and OS (R(2)=0·24, 0·00-0·70). Patients who attain pathological complete response defined as ypT0 ypN0 or ypT0/is ypN0 have improved survival. The prognostic value is greatest in aggressive tumour subtypes. Our pooled analysis could not validate pathological complete response as a surrogate endpoint for improved EFS and OS. US Food and Drug Administration. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014.

            The morphological evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer (BC) is gaining momentum as evidence strengthens for the clinical relevance of this immunological biomarker. Accumulating evidence suggests that the extent of lymphocytic infiltration in tumor tissue can be assessed as a major parameter by evaluation of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained tumor sections. TILs have been shown to provide prognostic and potentially predictive value, particularly in triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing BC. A standardized methodology for evaluating TILs is now needed as a prerequisite for integrating this parameter in standard histopathological practice, in a research setting as well as in clinical trials. This article reviews current data on the clinical validity and utility of TILs in BC in an effort to foster better knowledge and insight in this rapidly evolving field, and to develop a standardized methodology for visual assessment on H&E sections, acknowledging the future potential of molecular/multiplexed approaches. The methodology provided is sufficiently detailed to offer a uniformly applied, pragmatic starting point and improve consistency and reproducibility in the measurement of TILs for future studies. © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Trastuzumab Emtansine for Residual Invasive HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

              Patients who have residual invasive breast cancer after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapy have a worse prognosis than those who have no residual cancer. Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), an antibody-drug conjugate of trastuzumab and the cytotoxic agent emtansine (DM1), a maytansine derivative and microtubule inhibitor, provides benefit in patients with metastatic breast cancer that was previously treated with chemotherapy plus HER2-targeted therapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Cancer Res
                Clin Cancer Res
                Clinical Cancer Research
                American Association for Cancer Research
                1078-0432
                1557-3265
                01 September 2023
                07 July 2023
                : 29
                : 17
                : 3429-3437
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
                [2 ]Istituto Oncologico Veneto – IOV IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
                [3 ]Pathology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
                [4 ]Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
                [5 ]Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy.
                [6 ]Department of Medicine (DIMED), Surgical Pathology & Cytopathology Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
                [7 ]Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milano, Italy.
                [8 ]Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
                [9 ]Oncology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
                Author notes
                [* ] Corresponding Author: Valentina Guarneri, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto – IRCCS, Via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padova, Italy. E-mail: valentina.guarneri@ 123456unipd.it

                Clin Cancer Res 2023;29:3429–37

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6203-874X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8761-9265
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4327-1586
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8782-4509
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1390-4055
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7094-7986
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8098-1819
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8484-7871
                https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9253-6326
                https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4560-6678
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1231-7895
                https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8837-9657
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1004-2063
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5487-0683
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6515-5482
                https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2476-6947
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3202-1933
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1374-1831
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1042-3771
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2375-8397
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3967-9861
                Article
                CCR-23-0480
                10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-0480
                10472099
                37417941
                eda78d0d-b014-4144-af01-3fb8f12ba059
                ©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research

                This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.

                History
                : 22 February 2023
                : 26 April 2023
                : 03 July 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Funding
                Funded by: Fondazione AIRC 5 per mille, https://doi.org/10.13039/;
                Award ID: 22759
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, https://doi.org/10.13039/;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, https://doi.org/10.13039/;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: University of Padua, https://doi.org/10.13039/;
                Award ID: DOR funding
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: University of Padua, https://doi.org/10.13039/;
                Award ID: DOR funding
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: University of Padua, https://doi.org/10.13039/;
                Award ID: DOR funding
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Translational Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article