14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Tissue Doppler echocardiography and biventricular pacing in heart failure: Patient selection, procedural guidance, follow-up, quantification of success

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Asynchronous myocardial contraction in heart failure is associated with poor prognosis. Resynchronization can be achieved by biventricular pacing (BVP), which leads to clinical improvement and reverse remodeling. However, there is a substantial subset of patients with wide QRS complexes in the electrocardiogram that does not improve despite BVP. QRS width does not predict benefit of BVP and only correlates weakly with echocardiographically determined myocardial asynchrony. Determination of asynchrony by Tissue Doppler echocardiography seems to be the best predictor for improvement after BVP, although no consensus on the optimal method to assess asynchrony has been achieved yet. Our own preliminary results show the usefulness of Tissue Doppler Imaging and Tissue Synchronization Imaging to document acute and sustained improvement after BVP. To date, all studies evaluating Tissue Doppler in BVP were performed retrospectively and no prospective studies with patient selection for BVP according to echocardiographic criteria of asynchrony were published yet. We believe that these new echocardiographic tools will help to prospectively select patients for BVP, help to guide implantation and to optimize device programming.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Improved left ventricular mechanics from acute VDD pacing in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and ventricular conduction delay.

          Ventricular pacing can improve hemodynamics in heart failure patients, but direct effects on left ventricular (LV) function from varying pacing site and atrioventricular (AV) delay remain unknown. We hypothesized that the magnitude and location of basal intraventricular conduction delay critically influences pacing responses and that single-site pacing in the delay-activated region yields similar or better responses to biventricular pacing. Aortic and LV pressures were measured in 18 heart failure patients (mean+/-SD: LV ejection fraction, 19+/-7%; LV end-diastolic pressure, 25+/-8 mm Hg; QRS duration, 157+/-36 ms). Data under normal sinus rhythm were compared with ventricular pacing (VDD) at varying sites and AV delays (randomized order). Right ventricular (RV) apical or midseptal pacing had negligible contractile/systolic effects. However, LV free-wall pacing raised dP/dtmax by 23.7+/-19.0% and pulse-pressure by 18.0+/-18.4% (P<0.01). Biventricular pacing yielded less change (+12.8+/-9.3% in dP/dtmax, P<0.05 versus LV). Pressure-volume analysis performed in 11 patients consistently revealed minimal changes with RV pacing but increased stroke work and lower end-systolic volumes with LV pacing. Optimal AV intervals averaged 125+/-49 ms, and within this range, AV delay had less influence on LV function than pacing site. Basal QRS duration positively correlated with %DeltadP/dtmax (P<0.005), but pacing efficacy was not associated with QRS narrowing. Conduction delay pattern generally predicted pacing sites with most effect. VDD pacing acutely enhances contractile function in heart failure patients with intraventricular conduction delay. Single-site pacing at the site of greatest delay achieves similar or greater benefits to biventricular pacing in such patients. These data clarify pacing-effect mechanisms and should help in candidate identification for future studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Left ventricular or biventricular pacing improves cardiac function at diminished energy cost in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle-branch block.

            Left ventricular or biventricular pacing/stimulation can acutely improve systolic function in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and intraventricular conduction delay by resynchronizing contraction. Most heart failure therapies directly enhancing systolic function do so while concomitantly increasing myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO(2)). We hypothesized that pacing/stimulation, in contrast, incurs systolic benefits without raising energy demand. Ten DCM patients with left bundle-branch block (ejection fraction 20+/-3%, QRS duration 179+/-3 ms, mean+/-SEM) underwent cardiac catheterization to measure ventricular and aortic pressure, coronary blood flow, arterial-coronary sinus oxygen difference (DeltaAVO(2)), and MVO(2). Data were measured under sinus rhythm or with left ventricular or biventricular pacing/stimulation at the same heart rate. These results were then contrasted to intravenous dobutamine (n=7) titrated to match systolic changes during LV pacing. Systolic function rose quickly and substantially from LV pacing (18+/-4% rise in arterial pulse pressure, which correlates with cardiac output, and 43+/-6% increase in dP/dt(max); both P<0.01). However, DeltaAVO(2) and MVO(2) declined -4+/-2% and -8+/-6.5%, respectively (both P<0.05). Similar results were obtained with biventricular activation. In contrast, dobutamine raised dP/dt(max) 37+/-6%, accompanied by a 22+/-11% rise in per-beat MVO(2) (P<0.05 versus pacing). Ventricular resynchronization by left ventricular or biventricular pacing/stimulation in DCM patients with left bundle-branch block acutely enhances systolic function while modestly lowering energy cost. This should prove valuable for treating DCM patients with basal dyssynchrony.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cardiac resynchronization therapy tailored by echocardiographic evaluation of ventricular asynchrony.

              The value of interventricular and intraventricular echocardiographic asynchrony parameters in predicting reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was investigated. Cardiac resynchronization therapy has been suggested as a promising strategy in patients with severe heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB), but the entity of benefit is variable and no criteria are yet available to predict which patients will gain. Interventricular and intraventricular mechanical asynchrony was evaluated in 20 patients (8 men and 12 women, 63 +/- 10 years) with advanced heart failure caused by ischemic (n = 4) or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 16) and LBBB (QRS duration of at least 140 ms) using echocardiographic Doppler measurements. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) and left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) were calculated before and one month after CRT. Patients with a LVESVI reduction of at least 15% were considered as responders. Cardiac resynchronization therapy significantly improved ventricular volumes (LVEDVI from 150 +/- 53 ml/m(2) to 119 +/- 37 ml/m(2), p < 0.001; LVESVI from 116 +/- 43 ml/m(2) to 85 +/- 29 ml/m(2), p < 0.0001). At baseline, the responders had a significantly longer septal-to-posterior wall motion delay (SPWMD), a left intraventricular asynchrony parameter; only QRS duration and SPWMD significantly correlated with a reduction in LVESVI (r = -0.54, p < 0.05 and r = -0.70, p < 0.001, respectively), but the accuracy of SPWMD in predicting reverse remodeling was greater than that of the QRS duration (85% vs. 65%). In patients with advanced heart failure and LBBB, baseline SPWMD is a strong predictor of the occurrence of reverse remodeling after CRT, thus suggesting its usefulness in identifying patients likely to benefit from biventricular pacing.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cardiovasc Ultrasound
                Cardiovascular Ultrasound
                BioMed Central (London )
                1476-7120
                2004
                15 September 2004
                : 2
                : 17
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Charité Campus Mitte – University Medicine Berlin, Medical Clinic for Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology, 10098 Berlin, Germany
                [2 ]Klinik am See, Department of Cardiology, Rehabilitation Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, Seebad 84, 15562 Rüdersdorf (Berlin), Germany
                Article
                1476-7120-2-17
                10.1186/1476-7120-2-17
                521694
                15369591
                edcd6725-82ce-4fae-b444-9030dc8282a1
                Copyright © 2004 Knebel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 22 July 2004
                : 15 September 2004
                Categories
                Review

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                echocardiography,biventricular pacing,pacemaker programming,patient selection

                Comments

                Comment on this article