8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Thresholds for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Among African Americans in the Jackson Heart Study

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9962731e248">Background</h5> <p id="P1">Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) is the reference standard for out-of-clinic BP measurement. Thresholds for identifying ambulatory hypertension (daytime systolic BP [SBP]/diastolic BP [DBP] ≥ 135/85 mmHg, 24-hour SBP/DBP ≥ 130/80 mmHg, and nighttime SBP/DBP ≥ 120/70 mmHg) have been derived from European, Asian and South American populations. We determined BP thresholds for ambulatory hypertension in a US population-based sample of African Americans. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9962731e253">Methods</h5> <p id="P2">We analyzed data from the Jackson Heart Study (JHS), a population-based cohort study comprised exclusively of African-American adults (n=5,306). Analyses were restricted to 1,016 participants who completed ABPM at baseline in 2000-2004. Mean systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) levels were calculated for daytime (10:00am-8:00pm), 24-hour (all available readings) and nighttime (midnight-6:00am) periods, separately. Daytime, 24-hour, and nighttime BP thresholds for ambulatory hypertension were identified using regression- and outcome-derived approaches. The composite of a cardiovascular disease (CVD) or all-cause mortality event was used in the outcome-derived approach. For this latter approach, BP thresholds were identified only for SBP as clinic DBP was not associated with the outcome. Analyses were stratified by antihypertensive medication use. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9962731e258">Results</h5> <p id="P3">Among participants not taking antihypertensive medication, the regression-derived thresholds for daytime, 24-hour, and nighttime SBP/DBP corresponding to clinic SBP/DBP of 140/90 mmHg were 134/85 mmHg, 130/81 mmHg, and 123/73 mmHg, respectively. The outcome-derived thresholds for daytime, 24-hour, and nighttime SBP corresponding to a clinic SBP ≥ 140 mmHg were 138 mmHg, 134 mmHg, and 129 mmHg, respectively. Among participants taking antihypertensive medication, the regression-derived thresholds for daytime, 24-hour, and nighttime SBP/DBP corresponding to clinic SBP/DBP of 140/90 mmHg were 135/85 mmHg, 133/82 mmHg, and 128/76 mmHg, respectively. The corresponding outcome-derived thresholds for daytime, 24-hour, and nighttime SBP were 140 mmHg, 137 mmHg, and 133 mmHg, respectively, among those taking antihypertensive medication. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d9962731e263">Conclusions</h5> <p id="P4">Based on the outcome-derived approach for SBP and regression-derived approach for DBP, the following definitions for daytime hypertension, 24-hour hypertension, and nighttime hypertension corresponding to clinic SBP/DBP ≥ 140/90 mmHg are proposed for African Americans: daytime SBP/DBP ≥ 140/85 mmHg, 24-hour SBP/DBP ≥ 135/80 mmHg, and nighttime SBP/DBP ≥ 130/75 mmHg, respectively. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Screening for high blood pressure in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

          Update of the 2007 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) reaffirmation recommendation statement on screening for high blood pressure in adults.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Laboratory, reading center, and coordinating center data management methods in the Jackson Heart Study.

            Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the United States. In comparison to whites, African-Americans have a higher risk of dying from CVD and have a worse risk factor profile. The Jackson Heart Study (JHS) is designed to investigate the origin and natural history of CVD in African-Americans. Reading centers for electrocardiograms, echocardiograms, carotid ultrasonograms, pulmonary function tests, and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring provide training for data accrual, quality assurance assessments, and specialized measurements for research objectives. Laboratories adhering to well-established quality assurance programs provide blood and urine analyses, as well as storage of specimens for future assays. A new Coordinating Center was created to perform functions analogous to those of coordinating centers for multisite studies, including protocol development, data management, statistical analyses, and operational support for the study. An established coordinating center serves as a resource to the JHS Coordinating Center, providing assistance in preparing procedure manuals and data collection forms. This group also designed and developed the JHS data management system. This network of specialized research organizations is implementing state- of-the-science methodologies to assess prevalence, progression, and incidence of CVD and subclinical atherosclerosis, and to evaluate a myriad of risk factors. From November 2000 through March 2004, JHS collected 4000 data fields on each of more than 5300 African-American participants. This article describes the roles of specialized research agencies contributing to JHS, and the methodologies being utilized to accumulate study data. A diverse collection of scientific disciplines is required to collect the information needed to meet the objectives of the JHS.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              24-h ambulatory blood pressure in 352 normal Danish subjects, related to age and gender.

              The study was conducted to determine age and sex stratified normal values for 24-h ambulatory blood pressure. A sample of 352 healthy subjects (all white) were randomly selected from the community register and stratified by sex and age groups in decades from 20 to 79 years of age. Persons with a history of hypertension, cerebral apoplexy, diabetes, myocardial or renal disease, and who were taking blood pressure-influencing medication were excluded. Ambulatory blood pressure was recorded over 24 h, with measurements taken every 15 min from 07:00 to 22:59, and every 30 min from 23:00 to 6:59. Systolic blood pressure increased only slightly with age and was significantly higher in men than in women. The diastolic blood pressure increased only slightly with age in both sexes until the 50 to 59 years age group and declined thereafter. The diastolic blood pressure was not different for the two sexes. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure were approximately 15% lower during the night regardless of age or sex. Ambulatory blood pressure during the daytime was on an average of 5 mm Hg lower than office blood pressure, but the mean difference between the two measurements increased with age. The variability of the difference also increased with age. Normal values for ambulatory blood pressure are presented in a randomly selected age- and gender-stratified population. Differences between office blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure increased with age suggesting that the previously observed higher blood pressure seen in the elderly partly might be explained by a greater impact of white coat hypertension in older people.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Circulation
                Circulation
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                0009-7322
                1524-4539
                June 20 2017
                June 20 2017
                : 135
                : 25
                : 2470-2480
                Affiliations
                [1 ]From Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine (J.R., T.M.S., A.J.S., G.O.); Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York (D.S., M.A.); Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (J.N.B., P.M.); Center for Minority Health &amp; Health Disparities Research and Education, Xavier University of Louisiana, New Orleans (D.F.S.); Department of Public Health, Amsterdam Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands (C.A.); Department of...
                Article
                10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.027051
                5711518
                28428231
                ee1149e7-0c42-465b-96a2-07763934f8b6
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article