2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development and Verification of a Web Board Game Scale

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Our previous study suggested that monitoring online board gamers may be an efficient approach to curb illegal gambling. We aimed to invent and validate a behavioral scale for assessing the risk of problematic web-based board gaming.

          Methods

          The sample included 300 Korean adults, representing a response rate of 3.1%. All participants were asked to complete a set of questionnaires, which included questions on demographic variables, patterns of online board gaming, and the web-based board game scale score. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to determine whether the items on the new behavioral scale would indicate a risk of pathologic web-based board gaming behavior.

          Results

          The internal consistency of the 17-item scale was high (Cronbach’s α=0.89). The test-retest reliability of the 17-item scale in a randomly selected sample of 100 participants in 2 weeks was r=0.77 (p<0.001). The criterion-related validity based on a comparison of the total behavioral scale scores between the high-risk group and low-risk group was relatively high. The data obtained from the 300 participants were acceptable for a factor analysis. After removing 7 items from the 17-item scale, internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) of the 10-item scale increased to 0.936.

          Conclusion

          These results showed that the 10-item version of the scale appeared to be more valid than the 17-item version. We suggest that the 10-item web-based board game behavioral scale is a useful tool for assessing the risk of pathologic web-based board gaming.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Item-wording and the dimensionality of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: do they matter?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Online Gambling Addiction: the Relationship Between Internet Gambling and Disordered Gambling

            One of the most significant changes to the gambling environment in the past 15 years has been the increased availability of Internet gambling, including mobile; Internet gambling is the fastest growing mode of gambling and is changing the way that gamblers engage with this activity. Due to the high level of accessibility, immersive interface and ease at which money can be spent, concerns have been expressed that Internet gambling may increase rates of disordered gambling. The current paper aimed to provide an overview of the research to date as well as highlight new and interesting findings relevant to Internet gambling addiction. A comprehensive review of the existing literature was conducted to provide an overview of significant trends and developments in research that relates to disordered Internet gambling. This paper presents research to inform a greater understanding of adult participation in Internet gambling, features of this interface that may impact problem severity, the relationship between Internet gambling and related problems, as well as considering the role of the wider spectrum of gambling behaviour and relevant individual factors that moderate this relationship.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Examining the Effect of Reverse Worded Items on the Factor Structure of the Need for Cognition Scale

              Reverse worded (RW) items are often used to reduce or eliminate acquiescence bias, but there is a rising concern about their harmful effects on the covariance structure of the scale. Therefore, results obtained via traditional covariance analyses may be distorted. This study examined the effect of the RW items on the factor structure of the abbreviated 18-item Need for Cognition (NFC) scale using confirmatory factor analysis. We modified the scale to create three revised versions, varying from no RW items to all RW items. We also manipulated the type of the RW items (polar opposite vs. negated). To each of the four scales, we fit four previously developed models. The four models included a 1-factor model, a 2-factor model distinguishing between positively worded (PW) items and RW items, and two 2-factor models, each with one substantive factor and one method factor. Results showed that the number and type of the RW items affected the factor structure of the NFC scale. Consistent with previous research findings, for the original NFC scale, which contains both PW and RW items, the 1-factor model did not have good fit. In contrast, for the revised scales that had no RW items or all RW items, the 1-factor model had reasonably good fit. In addition, for the scale with polar opposite and negated RW items, the factor model with a method factor among the polar opposite items had considerably better fit than the 1-factor model.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Psychiatry Investig
                Psychiatry Investig
                PI
                Psychiatry Investigation
                Korean Neuropsychiatric Association
                1738-3684
                1976-3026
                February 2020
                7 February 2020
                : 17
                : 2
                : 106-113
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychiatry, Chung Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                [2 ]School of Social Welfare, Soongsil University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Doug Hyun Han, MD, PhD Department of Psychiatry, Chung Ang University Hospital, 102 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06973, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-2-6299-3132, Fax: +82-2-825-8474, E-mail: hduk70@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8905-1845
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9671-4627
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4842-6425
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-5485
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8314-0767
                Article
                pi-2019-0180
                10.30773/pi.2019.0180
                7046998
                32024354
                ee2d21b5-309f-4b88-9944-abce7bb726e8
                Copyright © 2020 Korean Neuropsychiatric Association

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 15 July 2019
                : 2 September 2019
                : 21 October 2019
                Categories
                Original Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                web-based board game,exploratory factor analysis,reliability,validity

                Comments

                Comment on this article