67
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Institutionalizing evidence-based practice: an organizational case study using a model of strategic change

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          There is a general expectation within healthcare that organizations should use evidence-based practice (EBP) as an approach to improving the quality of care. However, challenges exist regarding how to make EBP a reality, particularly at an organizational level and as a routine, sustained aspect of professional practice.

          Methods

          A mixed method explanatory case study was conducted to study context; i.e., in terms of the presence or absence of multiple, inter-related contextual elements and associated strategic approaches required for integrated, routine use of EBP ('institutionalization'). The Pettigrew et al. Content, Context, and Process model was used as the theoretical framework. Two sites in the US were purposively sampled to provide contrasting cases: i.e., a 'role model' site, widely recognized as demonstrating capacity to successfully implement and sustain EBP to a greater degree than others; and a 'beginner' site, self-perceived as early in the journey towards institutionalization.

          Results

          The two sites were clearly different in terms of their organizational context, level of EBP activity, and degree of institutionalization. For example, the role model site had a pervasive, integrated presence of EBP versus a sporadic, isolated presence in the beginner site. Within the inner context of the role model site, there was also a combination of the Pettigrew and colleagues' receptive elements that, together, appeared to enhance its ability to effectively implement EBP-related change at multiple levels. In contrast, the beginner site, which had been involved for a few years in EBP-related efforts, had primarily non-receptive conditions in several contextual elements and a fairly low overall level of EBP receptivity. The beginner site thus appeared, at the time of data collection, to lack an integrated context to either support or facilitate the institutionalization of EBP.

          Conclusion

          Our findings provide evidence of some of the key contextual elements that may require attention if institutionalization of EBP is to be realized. They also suggest the need for an integrated set of receptive contextual elements to achieve EBP institutionalization; and they further support the importance of specific interactions among these elements, including ways in which leadership affects other contextual elements positively or negatively.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION: A META-ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS OF DETERMINANTS AND MODERATORS.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework.

              Finding ways to deliver care based on the best possible evidence remains an ongoing challenge. Further theoretical developments of a conceptual framework are presented which influence the uptake of evidence into practice. A concept analysis has been conducted on the key elements of the framework--evidence, context, and facilitation--leading to refinement of the framework. While these three essential elements remain key to the process of implementation, changes have been made to their constituent sub-elements, enabling the detail of the framework to be revised. The concept analysis has shown that the relationship between the elements and sub-elements and their relative importance need to be better understood when implementing evidence based practice. Increased understanding of these relationships would help staff to plan more effective change strategies. Anecdotal reports suggest that the framework has a good level of validity. It is planned to develop it into a practical tool to aid those involved in planning, implementing, and evaluating the impact of changes in health care.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Implement Sci
                Implementation Science : IS
                BioMed Central
                1748-5908
                2009
                30 November 2009
                : 4
                : 78
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Health Services Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Independent Consultant, 321 Middle St, Amherst, MA 01002, USA
                [2 ]McGill University Health Centre & School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, CA
                [3 ]Centre for Health-Related Research, School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, UK
                [4 ]Alyce A Schultz and Associates, LLC, 5747 W Drake Court, Chandler, AZ 85226, USA
                [5 ]VA HSR&D Center for Organization, Leadership and Management Research, Boston, MA, 02130 USA
                [6 ]Health Policy and Management Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02118 USA
                Article
                1748-5908-4-78
                10.1186/1748-5908-4-78
                2795741
                19948064
                ee63f668-d75a-415e-916d-221be359b01b
                Copyright ©2009 Stetler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 23 October 2008
                : 30 November 2009
                Categories
                Research article

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article